Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

0809-2 Testing, debugging and verification, TDA566

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-02-02 - 2009-02-14
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Samuel Bengmark»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Informationsteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 42%
Around 20 hours/week»7 36%
Around 25 hours/week»3 15%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

- Barely anything.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 10%
75%»9 47%
100%»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

- Half a lecture.» (0%)
- Missed some excercises.» (75%)
- Missed most exercises due to other lectures being scheduled at the same time.» (75%)
- Overall good lectures» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 88%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- A lot of content that we already know from other courses. Especially in the testing and debugging part.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- WAY too low...» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 38%
Yes, definitely»10 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- can"t test everything, and exams tend to focus on details you can google when ya need them :p» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»3 15%
Large extent»10 52%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- infact assistant were also hard to catch.» (Small extent)
- The information on KeY-Hoare was TERRIBLE.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»5 26%
Some extent»7 36%
Large extent»7 36%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Didn"t read anything except for slides basically.» (Small extent)
- Bought all the books, a fortune, didn"t read them, altough I will read them in future (maybe)» (Some extent)
- Lecture slides only» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 57%
Very well»8 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- (I don"t know)» (Rather well)
- The google-group is a nice addition!» (Very well)
- good with the google groups and very good slides» (Very well)
- Appreciate thé googl group» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»5 26%
Very good»9 47%
I did not seek help»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 26%
Very well»13 68%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»15 78%
High»2 10%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»10 52%
High»6 31%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 21%
Good»10 52%
Excellent»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I felt like I learned almost nothing of practical value. Maybe the IT students did, but I know I didn"t.» (Poor)
- Some very good parts(formal specification/Formal verification) and unfortunately some not so great parts(testing) » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- discussion group»
- Exercise»
- Wolfgang»
- Labs, pretty much everything I learnt during the course were from doing the labs»
- Hoare triples, formal specification. Debugging wasn"t really of much value.»
- Jml»
- Teachers»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Less focus on things that everyone should know after an introductory course in progamming and and introductory course in logic....»
- debugging part should be improved »
- exercises could be compulsory.»
- No KeY-Hoare, it was an absolute horror to work with. Absolutely terrible.»
- It"s not relevant to do a lecture about eclipse debugger »
- One should be able to reappear in exam soon after the first exam.»

16. Additional comments

- both teachers were busy except Fredrik and assistants didn"t answers on email.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från