ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Microwave Projects, part II, MCC110, HT2008, MPMPE, MCC110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-01-28 - 2009-02-21
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 0 0%

Around 20 hours/week» 3 37%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 50%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 12%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- depends on the project load for each groups » (Around 25 hours/week)
- Due to the course delay of 6 weeks, the time sums up to 30 h.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%» 1 12%

25%» 2 25%

50%» 1 12%

75%» 3 37%

100%» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- it"s a project not a course» (0%)
- Very poor quality on the lectures.» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 25%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 5 62%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 28%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 5 71%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- It is possible to pass the course doing very little job since it has been poor monitored group projects mostly. Just let the other students do your work. The difficulties with giving a re-examination shouldn"t be a reason to let all students pass the course! What become the quality then?» (No, the goals are set too low)
- But this demands that the course is handled in a decent way by teachers and examinators » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all» 2 28%

To some extent» 2 28%

Yes, definitely» 0 0%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 3 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- no exam» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent» 3 37%

Some extent» 4 50%

Large extent» 0 0%

Great extent» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- "No extent at all" was not an option...» (Small extent)
- Not at all, or to a very small extent.» (Small extent)
- This couse should be learned by self» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent» 4 50%

Some extent» 3 37%

Large extent» 0 0%

Great extent» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- no material» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly» 5 62%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 2 25%

Very well» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- Extremely bad. I"ve never had a course with such a terrible administration before. Very embarrassing for us students since part of the course is given in collaboration with the industry. As a student you"ve struggled with your studies in several years and then a course like this make you look like a fool for an important possible future employer. The fact that the course will probably last until March when it should be ended in December prove this statement very well according to me.» (Very badly)
- course administration has been catastrofal. Bad planing, bad information and "say one thing do the other" is the reason why the course have been delayd.» (Very badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor» 2 25%

Rather poor» 2 25%

Rather good» 1 12%

Very good» 3 37%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Extremely poor feedback on your deliveries. However, the PhD students were very helpful.» (Very poor)
- "ÖÖÖ, well, I dont know, I will look into that" (in swinglish) have been the standard aswer when asking something.» (Very poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly» 2 25%

Rather poorly» 2 25%

Rather well» 1 12%

Very well» 2 25%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Hasn"t worked well at all. Very crucial since we had to work in the same groups in almost four study periods. How can I get a fair grade when my performance depends totally on the other four students inmy group?! Also, very poor knowledge in English and writing technical reports among some students. I don"t want to spend several hours correcting terrible English and checking for plagiarism. Approx. 50% of the time writing the reports has been spent on this. And I don"t get anything useful knowledge out of that!» (Very poorly)
- There have been two groups throughout the course, one with good cooperation and one with bad. Luckily I have belonged to the well functioning group.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low» 1 12%

Low» 2 25%

Adequate» 4 50%

High» 1 12%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Project 2 in the course could have been finished within three or four weeks with a good administration. Intead, it lasted for around 16 weeks! And this was afterwards blamed on the students. During the project, the delay was no problem for the examiner. Simultaneously, when project 3 started it was expected that we shouldn"t do anything else, not even our second compulsory course.» (Too low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 62%

High» 3 37%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- the project extend too long and not well organized. » (Adequate)
- Difficult to give a proper answer since the course has lasted over four study periods.» (High)
- 60 h a week in 8 weeks. One of the heaviest periods so far» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor» 4 50%

Fair» 2 25%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 1 12%

Excellent» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED. Reformulated content: better leadership and friendlier treatment of the students was requested.» (Poor) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Nothing. Erase this course.»
- Nothing.»
- The company projects»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The deadline of the projects should be clearify and fixed. The time for the part 3 should be longer and full time.»
- schedule, the course is last for 3 quarter. it really delay my plan. »
- Everything.»
- The course administration.»
- This course should be re-orginized. It was quite ironic to have many course organization problems in the course where we students were supposed to learn about project organization. We never had a course syllabus with including critical due dates. Consequently the course runover the time. For that kind of project courses, setting the due dates and making a time plan is vital from my point of view. »
- THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED. Reformulated content: suggest a different teacher next year.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. Additional comments

- the industrial study is not a good idea to run the course this way. »
- The small project 1 was pretty good. The quality demands on project 2 were extremely low. Then, in project 3, the companies had very high demands. As everyone understand, this became a large problem since we worked in groups. Its much harder to change a group"s performance than an individual"s.»
- There have, continiously, been many complains about how this course has been handled. I agree with them all! You talk about "ensure quality", to do that I suggest that you realy listen to the upset students and do som mayor changes.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

Kursutvärderingssystem från