Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ICT Economics and Policy, TEK320

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-01-27 - 2009-05-26
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Erik Bohlin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

23 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 30%
Around 20 hours/week»6 26%
Around 25 hours/week»6 26%
Around 30 hours/week»4 17%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 18%
75%»8 36%
100%»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

- around 80%» (?)
- Hard to see a red line in the lectures» (50%)
- good lecturers» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 4%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 52%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- It might be useful to clarify the "fil rouge" that links the lectures, otherwise they might seem separated one from the other, preventing the achievement of a thorough perspective on the course"s topic» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

22 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»21 95%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.95

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»9 40%
Yes, definitely»13 59%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.59


6. How long time did you spend on the take-home exam?

23 svarande

Less than 10 hours»0 0%
10-20 hours»4 17%
20-30 hours»9 39%
30-40 hours»7 30%
More than 40 hours»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

7. How long time did you spend on the project?

23 svarande

Less than 10 hours»1 4%
10-20 hours»2 8%
20-30 hours»8 34%
30-40 hours»9 39%
More than 40 hours»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

8. What grade would you give the take-home exam as a means to learning?

23 svarande

5 - very good»8 34%
4 - good»11 47%
3 - average»3 13%
2 - bad»1 4%
1 - very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

- Those that are willing to explore more in detail a topic have the possibility to do so. The only risk is that the topics not covered by the home exam might be "abandoned".» (5 - very good)

9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?

23 svarande

5 - very good»5 21%
4 - good»11 47%
3 - average»6 26%
2 - bad»1 4%
1 - very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

- Team work is stressful, time consuming, frustrating. Nevertheless, it is always an important experience.» (5 - very good)
- Maybe the purpose of the project should be more controlled and guided. » (3 - average)
- Instead of leaving students to choose whatever they want to work on it, it would be better to draw some limits as a guideline to choose where to go. If is painful to decide what to work on it, especially if you do not know your group members that much.» (2 - bad)

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»3 13%
Some extent»5 21%
Large extent»14 60%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- To many guest lectures brakes the flow and connection between the different areas of the course. Some of the guest lectures were also bad.» (Small extent)
- All the guest lectures was somewhat unconnected and the scope of the course was broad. » (Some extent)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 21%
Large extent»16 69%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- Mostly good reading. » (Large extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»12 52%
Very well»11 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- Havent really reflected upon it» (Rather well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»10 43%
Very good»11 47%
I did not seek help»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 34%
Very well»15 65%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- Only swedish students in the group and I knew them from before. Exchange students usually bring down the cooperation due to low work level.» (Very well)

15. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»18 78%
High»4 17%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

16. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»17 73%
High»4 17%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 13%
Adequate»2 8%
Good»14 60%
Excellent»4 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

- Please keep this course running for future students» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Martin Fransman"s book and his lectures.»
- The take home exam»
- THe home exam, it summarized the course in a good way»
- Everything"s OK»
- take-home exam. »
- project, but explained better the real task.»
- Everything»
- the textbook,lecture notes and project is good.»
- The presence of many different lecturers: it is very interesting to listen to so many different point of views. »

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The Italian professor"s (sorry can not remember name) lecture was not useful in terms of ICT. It was a good way of exemplifying how to use statistical methods which can be learn in statistics/econometrics course instead.»
- The project»
- More workload to clearly state what should be done»
- I don"t know»
- Less guest lectures.»
- Nothing»
- not everyone has learned economics ever,if some basic concepts can be introduced,which is better.»
- The lecture on econometrics is almost useless for those that have never had an introduction on it.»

20. Additional comments

- A red line through the lectures is missing.»
- LEctures felt unconnected. Hard to understand what the learning outcomes were. Dont think I have learnt so much from the course. Few things to do during the 7 weeks, give more assignments, force people to learn, have discussions use handins to make everyone prepare for the discussion»

Kursutvärderingssystem från