ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SUBURBS- design & future challenges, MPDSD ARK 320

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-01-27 - 2009-02-16
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Marie Strid»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

Knowledge and understanding: Describe and relate to political visions of sustainable development and how they relate to the development of suburban areas.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»2 33%
Sufficient»3 50%
Excellent»1 16%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- i have a much broader image on political processes and their impact on city development. how economical sustainability tend to become dominant, and how it"s accepted as a reality of today. suburbs that are low on the socio-economic ladder have nothing to give in economic return to political investors and thus, are low priorities, not yet seen as an important part of the city web...» (Excellent)

2. Learning outcome 2

Knowledge and Understanding: Identify the meaning and impact on the professional work.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 16%
Sufficient»4 66%
Excellent»1 16%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 3

- i"m not sure i understand the question. but i"ve thought much more about the role of the architect in our society, what we chose to make of ourselves » (Excellent)

3. Learning outcome 3

Knowledge and Understanding : Review and explain general concepts and conceptual models for these kinds of work and studies.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»7 100%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3

- it"s a hard thing to learn and, i assume, something that needs to be based on much experience. maybe time was a bit too short for that » (Sufficient)

4. Learning outcome 4

Knowledge and understanding: Provide evidence on the usefulness of design for sustainable development in suburban contexts.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»1 11%
sufficient»5 55%
Excellent»1 11%
No opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

5. Learning outcome 5

Ability and Skill: Be able to use analytic methods and tools for the inventory and analysis of the built environment in the suburban context.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»4 44%
excellent»3 33%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- i"m not sure, again, what is asked for really but i"m not sure the inventory of the built environment was made differently in HK than we have done in other places...» (sufficient)
- I got the impression that in this course it has given too much importance to these tools and methods.» (sufficient)

6. Learning outcome 6

Ability and Skill: Be able to critically search for information and assess the quality of different sources of information.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»5 55%
excellent»2 22%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- but could be even more focus on that! » (excellent)

7. Learning outcome 7

Ability and Skill: Be able to design and assess concrete proposals and solutions for local sustainable development.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»2 22%
sufficient»2 22%
excellent»3 33%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- time is too short to reach concrete proposals when working like this.» (sufficient)

8. Learning outcome 8

Ability and Skill: Be able to visualise and communicate with inhabitants and other stakeholders and experts in different stages of the design process.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»1 11%
sufficient»2 22%
excellent»4 44%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

9. Learning outcome

Ability and Skill: Be able to give and motivate proposals with reference to scientific, and/or experience-based, knowledge and value-based arguments.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»4 44%
excellent»3 33%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- and it was followed up at the evaluation - really good!» (excellent)

10. Learning outcome

Ability of Assessment and Attitude: To compare and assess different sources and statements concerning design for sustainable development.

8 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»5 62%
excellent»0 0%
no opinion»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- these learning outcome phrases are very hollow when i think about it... very hard to react to or to understand what they mean in a more concrete sense. maybe THAT"S something to consider...» (?)

11. Learning outcome

Ability of Assessment and Attitude: To combine knowledge from different disciplines and sectors in proposals for actions and measures in design for sustainable development.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»4 44%
excellent»3 33%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- the easy part was combining knowledge from "closer" disciplines: property owners, city planners, housing companies... but collaborations w teacher-students, conservationists, social study students were sometimes started but never fully realized - pity! » (sufficient)

12. Learning outcome

Ability of Assessment and Attitude: To combine scientific and artistic approaches in the design process.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»1 11%
sufficient»1 11%
excellent»5 55%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

13. Learning outcome

Ability of Assessment and Attitude: To broaden the understanding of the own perspective and its limitations, through meetings with other professional and cultural perspectives on urban and suburban sustainable development.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»3 33%
excellent»4 44%
no opinion»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

14. learning outcome

Ability of Assessment and Attitude: To further develop a critical thinking and reflections on the professional role and ethics.

9 svarande

very insufficient»0 0%
insufficient»0 0%
sufficient»2 22%
excellent»4 44%
no opinion»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- great seminars!» (excellent)

15. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

8 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2

- the goals (at chalmers) are very abstract and don"t really serve me in any way i can think of. honestly, i never read them before taking a course...» (?)

16. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

9 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»1 16%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»5 83%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»0 0%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 1.83

Education and course administration

17. Lecture 1

Photo cavalcade: The story of Hammarkullen

(Jens S. Jensen

- good and "human" intoduction»
- was very good to start puting a face to hammarkullen and start thinking about the stories of people living there.»
- great. i really like jens way of showing people as the important part of a city/suburb/area»
- GOOD»
- interesting»
- Interesting and useful for our research»
- Very interesting and useful.»

18. lecture 2

Principles and practice of rebuilding of The Million Programme

Solveig Schulz

- good base and background»
- was a good introduction for the one who didn"t know anything about the million programme»
- ok»
- GOOD»
- interesting »
- Good as a background info.»

19. lecture 3

Principles and practice of rebuilding of The Working with cultural heritage in the context of metropolitan affairs: aim, resources 6 results”, Ylva Blank

- hard to follow»
- ok»
- LONG»
- No opinion»

20. lecture 4

”,Modern memories”,
Sanja Peter

- Can not recall»
- ok»
- LONG»
- no opinion»

21. lecture 5

Suburban Youth Culture
Ove Sernhede

- Did not give much to me, more or less just read his own text that we already had seem ourselves.»
- nices story about the youngster, very pleasfull to see the movie and put voice and face on the stories. would like to know a bit more about the new generation of Hk youngsters»
- he read from his own text that we all had already looked through. not so inspiring although i like his work»
- GOOD»
- no opinion»
- Redundant»
- very interesting.»

22. lecture 6

The planning situation for suburbs in the northeast of Gothenburg including Hammarkullen.

Eva Tenow

- Very useful and a good base for understanding Hammarkullen»
- good to have the urban design point of view but could come a bit earlier»
- ok. important!»
- good»
- very interesting»

23. lecture 7

The planning situation for suburbs in the Hammarkullen district authority

Eeva Bolin

- good»
- ok»
- very good»
- Very interesting»
- Too generic»

24. lecture 8

Developing a professional platform.

Lasse Fryk & Bosse Forsén

- found it a bit hard to relate it to my own work»
- needed a bit more of introduction, i really got this lecture only few weeks after»
- great. they are real pedagogs, i would listen to anything they say»
- bad»
- no opinion»

25. lecture 9

Interplace Planning –, Theory & Practice: Partnership & Participation in transformation of multicultural neighborhoods

Jenny Stenberg

- Interesting to hear about real projects and other ways of working»
- very good to see the failure as weel as the success of work with participation.»
- ok»
- good»
- no opinion»

26. lecture 10

Tools for communication.
Stefan Petersson

- Lessons on communications are needed within this course, but this one was not very helpful to me. »
- very usefull tools. nice to have this mini workshop in the end to test on ourself the tools. could also come a bit earlier »
- ok. interesting but not directly useful»
- good»
- interesting»
- trivial»

27. lecture 11

To handle Cultural Heritage in Conflicts.
Inger-Lise Syversen

- good»
- ok»
- good»
- very interesting»
- Interesting, but maybe out of topic for this course»

28. lecture 12

Cultural Heritage –, experiences from working with Cultural Heritage without borders.
Kersti Berggren

- interesting as an introduction to what the cultural heritage board works with»
- ok»
- good»
- interesting»

29. lecture 13

Vision Angered and Hammarkullen.

Jan-Åke Rydberg

- Not good at lecturing»
- good! different from what i expected, openminded»
- good»
- interesting»

30. lecture 14

Dialogue Sothern riverbank: Intervention or the need for a new cultural critique.

Catharina Thörn

- good. »
- great! one of my favourites»
- bad»
- no opinion»

31. lecture 15

The problems of power in community dialogue: Basic training and critical reflections. Deleuze and Foucault.

Per Herngren

- missing..»
- interesting and quite fun. but i realized the importance of it much later»
- very bad»
- no opinion»

32. lecture 16

Further development of your professional theoretical and practical platform.
Lasse Fryk & Bosse Forsén

- good organisation, good discution. maybe a bit short»
- great again!»
- not very usefull»
- no opinion»

33. What did you think about the assignments?

First impressions

- ok»
- good - but could have been done w someone else. maybe any medium should be allowed - collecting things, taking photos, drawings, quotes... collage?»
- good but sometimes too long»
- good to know more about the place to work on.»
- Not more than a small walk, could be integrated in the second assignment»
- Maybe a bit too basic. Oops, only First impression!»

34. Assignment 1

“,the urban fabric and the spaces between”,

Matts Heijl & Katri Lisitzin

- tiresome but maybe necessary»
- good start»
- standard assignment. ok»
- good»
- no opinion»
- More useful than the former one»
- Good»

35. Assignment 2

“,the social environment”,

Jenny Stenberg & Katri Lisitzin

- well-organised»
- good start»
- ok»
- good»
- no opinion»
- maybe the most interesting aspect of this course.»

36. Assignment 3

“,a close look at a building”,

Solveig Schulz & Malin Weijmer

- good»
- a bit to many time see in our education..»
- ok»
- good»
- no opinion»
- Fundamental»
- Good »

37. What did you think about ...?

In smaller groups visiting other suburbs in Gothenburg.

- good»
- we had no guide, so finally we didnt learn so much from our visit. the exchange with the other was interesting, but it would be nicer to rent a bus for a few hours to see everything.»
- should have been done w a guide!!! at least a first time and then maybe visiting a few more on our own. more structured presentation afterwards!»
- not very usefull»
- very interesting»
- Without any more detailed information they are almost useless»
- Good to have a reason to actually go there.»

38. Walking tour?

Einar Hansson guiding tour in Hammarkullen

- to late...»
- really to late, we alredy discovered by ourself all the comment. should come much earlier (or not come)»
- badly timed, added nothing. he should have given the tour right away »
- good»
- need to be more earlier !»
- Too late in the schedule»

39. Presentations of houshold studies

Jenny Stenberg & Katri Lisitzin

- very good asigment, was the first tools we used changing from the usual one.»
- good assignment, pretty lousy presentaitons. and where were the gu-students? »
- good»
- no opinion»

40. Programme seminar:

Old and new in re-formation of modern buildings.

- good»
- good question about the values of the question, but we focus a bit to much on the 2 textes and didn"t have the time to come in a more general reflection»
- ok texts but the discussion was lame - the group was too large, same people talking, vague questions»
- good»
- no opinion»

41. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

8 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»2 25%
Rather big»5 62%
Very big»1 12%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.87

42. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 33%
Rather well»6 66%
Very well»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- the line between self organisation and teacher-led organisation was too vague. too many places to go for information. but the enthusiasm was there however» (Rather bad)
- There was a lot of confusion at the beginning concerning the individual (or group) projects. But it is very good to have access to almost all the information, schedules etc, on internet.» (Rather well)

Work environment

43. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 11%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»4 44%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- always(?) possible to reach the teachers in their office or by phone. good support» (Very well)

44. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»4 44%
Very good»5 55%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- many disussions, many opinions, many changes and in the end, a better project» (Very good)
- I Love this class!» (Very good)

Concluding questions

45. What is your overall opinion of the course?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 11%
Passed»3 33%
Good»3 33%
Very good»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

46. What should be preserved next year?

- exhibition»
- relation with very different actors in Hk, it"s bring us broad perspective»
- many of the seminars. the critical reflection text (but less based on the literature)! the collaborations with other fields of study, other professions. lasses and bosses participation. household visits.»
- working in the suburbs, not in chalmers»
- mixed group !»
- The first part with mixed groups, the final critic with external professors»
- The "laborations" we did together in different groups, getting to know the area. Good to have our mondaymeetings every week. »

47. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- focus more on how to pass from participation to design.»
- maybe getting a broader picture of suburbs generally in the beginning, the context. more discussions in small groups, mix people (that way the project groups don"t become too solitary). more focus on importance of monday morning meetings.»
- Changed the groups, mix them more don"t allowed Swedish presentation»
- No group only swedish because difficult to follow their project and the result and to participate in the discussion.»
- The first part in HK should be shorter, with more time for the project.»
- planning concer ning the exhibition. More time to prepare.»

48. Other comments

- better communication. first part a bit shorter.»
- i don"t think i ever used the little info leaflets that you gave us... it was always my number or nothing.»
- Obligation to work in english that all the people can follow all the groups.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från