|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Course evaluation IAR061, IAR061Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2007-10-27 - 2007-11-21 Antal svar: 41 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64% Kontaktperson: lars trygg» Klass: Övriga
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.21 - good and even workload» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.51 - I was sick for a long time.» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.39 - At least I don"t remeber the goals» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - I think this is the core subject in our education, more effort should be put in this subject. The problem is that it is too short, it could be made longer or split into two courses, giving a deeper understanding of the subject.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.63 - There could be one argumentative question in the exam.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?40 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - Really great and interesting lectures!» (Great extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?40 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - The literature source was old and it niether stuck to just theory nor it presented up to date valuable tools.» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.39 - The late book was quite a problem, but some things are just impossible to control I guess» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - I ended up with only foreigners, which is a good experience, but should not be the result of making your own groups, which was now te case. All Swedes were gone within two minutes leaving me with Iranians, Nigerians, Russians and Turkish people, which made it a lot more difficult to fulfill the project.» (Very poorly) 11. How was the course workload?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.29 - As expected for this level of course» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.41 - This was the only course I took this period, but I fall out of the frame since I"m not a regular student.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?41 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.14 - My expectations on the course are fulfilled and then some» (Good) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- I think the litterature reviews were very good, the lecture by Max was nice and I think the whole course organization was prefectly fine!»- The Applied Case, Lean Games» - Case excercise, guest lectures, the whole course programme. Topic reports don"t really seem to teach much on the course topic, compared to the time spent.» - The case. The lean development game. The book. The real-life inspired lectures.» - arrange more for the group defination» - The flow of the course.» - The literature reviews» - Lean development game» - The Excavator!» - the development game, reallt fun! And you learned alot.» - The project, the seminars and the external lectures.» - Seminarierna» - The Lean Development game. The many connections to practical examples in the lectures.» - The game and the guest lectures. The game gave me very much in colaboration- and leadership issues that I thougth about earlier, I was prject leader in the first round.» - the work in groups, practical activities and closed relation with the student.» - I think I learned a lot from the Case study and from the Topic report especially from my group and a few other groups.» - projects» - The course literture» - The course literature» - Lean game was one off the best experience. » - Litreture reviews» - literature reviews, guest lecturers, lars trygg lectures» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Nothing really»- Literature Seminars, the only thing it gave was that you got some pressure on yourself to read the chapters. No feedback from the questions answered! Generally no feedback was given from any of the papers handed in!!! » - Maybe, the topic reports should have different form (don"t know which, though).» - exercise part» - Literature source. Guest lecturers from industry portraying clearer relations to the theories taught. The second game can include a discussion or report on lessons learned in regard with theory.» - The topic report presentation should be one week earlier so that everything doesn´,t come the last week.» - -» - I don"t think there"s a need for changing the course.» - The way the Topic Report presentations were judged (by the students). I think it"s unfair to let the students judge eachother - this is the examiners role! It"s also hard to get the message (and learn something for the exam) when you have to grade every group you are listening to.» - the exam must be easier. » - Fix the boock in time! Exam results on web page! » - The weekley literture reviews should be improved by a more intence diskussion. It was to weak. » - The quality of the topic reports was very poor. There should be meetings with "doktorander" a few times to get a better connection.» - I could not find something considerable.» - The load of topic report» - not put 8 other topic reports on the web five days before the exam» - integrate as possible exchange student with other master"s student.» - Maybe on the examination also more questions about insight (e.g. case) instead of only knowledge since that is one of the goals.» 16. Additional comments- -»- Thank you for a very good course!» - I think the topic report was a bit boring even though it contributed to my learning and it was good for me to get some experience of using databases in cth library.» - NO COMMENTS» - I think students with other bachground than Industrial engineering needs some comments to learn initial knowledge of this kind» - I liked the course a lot.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19%