Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation for Computer Graphics, TDA361/INN221

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-26 - 2007-11-21
Antal svar: 33
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 61%
Kontaktperson: Ulf Assarsson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

33 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»12 36%
Around 20 hours/week»11 33%
Around 25 hours/week»7 21%
Around 30 hours/week»3 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.03

- My previous experience with C++, OpenGL and graphics made the labs really easy. And I didn"t read all of the book.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- In fact, I always hope to attend some practical projects that the lecturer is carrying out. That"s more helpful, at least for me, to understand the course contents.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I had some experience which decreased the workload» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The number of hours a week increased each week, the last 2 weeks seemed like I didn"t do anything else but work on the tutorial or the exam» (Around 25 hours/week)
- I think, didn"t exactly measure my time..» (Around 25 hours/week)
- the first 2 weeks i worked less but the two last weeks i sat 24/7 with this course and another course im taking» (Around 30 hours/week)
- Pretty requesting course, but it"s fun so you really don"t care.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

33 svarande

0%»2 6%
25%»6 18%
50%»0 0%
75%»7 21%
100%»18 54%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It was not because of bad lectures. They where great.» (25%)
- I have really hard to get up at morning (i know 13.00 aint morning but its still hard)» (75%)
- Ok, almost at least, around 95%.» (100%)
- 90%» (100%)
- The course is interesting and attractive especially when certain demos are presented.» (100%)
- Well, alomst :)» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

33 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»11 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 21%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 45%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- I don"t remember the goals now..» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- just skimmed through them at the beginning of the course, nothing I think about during or after the course» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- I never do» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- The goals are a little bit "abstract" before the course, but they turn to be clearer on completion of the course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- really good goals» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- Though I think the title "Computer Graphics" implies a more general field than "3D graphics (mostly in the real-time area, using OpenGL)" - which is what I later found the course to contain.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

27 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»27 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Could be a bit hard if you not know c++» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»10 37%
Yes, definitely»15 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- The exam definitely tests the knowledge taught in the course (it did cover lots of aspects of the course!), however, for some students it doesn"t need to carry out any practical lab assignment to pass the exam.» (To some extent)
- if you count the labs as a part of the examination» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 21%
Large extent»13 40%
Great extent»12 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- I appreciate the lecturer as well as the assistants" effort!» (Large extent)
- The lectures have been execellent. Inspiring and easy to understand.» (Great extent)
- Very good lectures :)» (Great extent)
- Especially the assignments» (Great extent)
- The lectures were really good, but they were a bit too much information on each. I"ve would have preferred having more lectures with less on them.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent»7 21%
Some extent»11 34%
Large extent»9 28%
Great extent»5 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- In fact, I didn"t buy the required text book. The course .pdf files are enough to pass the exam. But I know for sure that through the course literature I can learn more. So, I decide to buy a second-hand copy after the exam.» (Small extent)
- (Did not have the course literature)» (Some extent)
- Coursebook have been very good. Felt like a covering introduction to the area of computer graphics.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

33 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 9%
Rather well»14 42%
Very well»16 48%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

- Lite rörig hemsida, bl.a. låg inte alltid de senaste nyheterna överst. Mycket text, hade behövt en tydligare layout för att strukturera innehållet.» (Rather badly)
- » (Rather badly)
- Lab time didn"t work all that well. Classrooms that were supposed to be booked weren"t, and there were not nearly enough computers half of the time.» (Rather badly)
- Some labdeadlines (cgfx/multiplayer) where unclear.» (Rather well)
- The course homepage felt a bit cluttered and could easily be made more readable.» (Rather well)
- We can"t copy/paste email address, we have to rewrite it, and a Lab link should be greater at the top of the main page» (Rather well)
- I like the web page and .pdf files!» (Very well)
- everything and more was to find on the homepage» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

33 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»7 21%
Rather good»10 30%
Very good»12 36%
I did not seek help»3 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Getting help during labs could take one to two hours, even to just get a finished lab approved. Ridiculous.» (Very poor)
- We waited 2 hours at one lab only to get a chance to get our labcode reviewed. Even tho this was fixed later on (two lists - one for help one for reviewing) one more lab assistant wouldn"t have hurt.» (Rather poor)
- Hard to get help on the lab-opportunities.» (Rather poor)
- I assume you mean for the tutorials. You need more than one assistant for those occasions, sometimes it took over an hour before the assistant finally manage to come to us, to many people needing help at the same time. It took until the last week until he started to have two list, one for those that wanted help and one for those that wanted to review » (Rather poor)
- When we got help it was super, but it happened to few times. There is need for more lab-assistants» (Rather poor)
- Jag kom tyvärr bara på vissa deadline tillfällen för att uppvisa inlämningsuppgifter, då var det väldigt fullt med folk, men jag antar att jag får skylla mig själv.» (Rather good)
- There could have been more assistance on the labs. There were long queues.» (Rather good)
- It took fairly long time sometimes to get help, but when we got help the help was really good!!!» (Rather good)
- The lecturer and assistants in lab are helpful.» (Rather good)
- lots of waiting in line at the tutorials.» (Rather good)
- i dont ask question often» (Rather good)
- It was a bit messy on the tutorial sesssions. You could wait for hours just to get your things approved.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

33 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»13 39%
Very well»11 33%
I did not seek cooperation»7 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- since i read another couse at linholmen campus it was hard to bond with my fellow students» (Rather poorly)
- We did at one occasion have a big argue about wine vs beer during pre-labarrangements but it was settled peacefully.» (Rather well)
- I worked well with my teammate. I don"t know whether I was lucky or it"s the same case for all other students.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

32 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»19 59%
High»12 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

- to many tutorials at the same time at the end of curse, they should be better distributed over the course period.» (Adequate)
- but it was fun, for the first time during my studies at chamers i acctually enjoyed seeing the finished product from my labs» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

32 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 9%
Adequate»14 43%
High»11 34%
Too high»4 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I took 2 courses. This and ITS022 and the workload of the other course was less. Thereby the response Adequate.» (Adequate)
- don"t know what differs this question from the above one...» (Adequate)
- Read 150%...» (High)
- But that was optional.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

33 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»1 3%
Good»18 54%
Excellent»13 39%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Bra översikt av de olika ämnena.» (Good)
- The difference between what we did during the lecture and what we did at the tutorial, differed greatly. To really learn what you teach at the lectures, you really need to use it to understand it, and it was not often that happened.» (Good)
- Feels nice with a "practical exercises"- course now and then.» (Good)
- would"ve liked to see a little more theory and less opengl.» (Good)
- Very interesting and useful course, despite the lab issues.» (Good)
- I really liked the course, the only thing that could be better was maybe one lecture with someone from the industry (game, movie or so). » (Excellent)
- more courses like this» (Excellent)
- It was an extremely fun and rewarding course.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Labs are very good and match with lectures»
- tutorials»
- The lecturing which did not only provide a good grasp of each part of the course but also gave interesting examples and notes from the industry which is also very helpful and appreciated.»
- The amount of math and programing. It was a good mix. »
- Almost everything.»
- The lectures. »
- The web site and .pdf files.»
- there were nothing wrong with the tutorials, just how they were distributed.»
- Lab pratices. Just a couple of notes: -I found not useful at all to learn about formats to store scenes. -Some of the lab sessions (like ray-tracing) I"d personally change them so they don"t look so good and are more simple, but you actually get to interact with the program.»
- Ulf and Erik! Great persons that really know how to help us.»
- The content and structure. Gave a good insight in many things.»
- the labs »
- Everything but the lab-assistant amount. There should be at least 2.»
- The tutorials»
- projects as an alternative to laborations»
- The tee-shirts ! Your happiness»
- The overall contents»
- laboratories»
- the course structure»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing»
- more tutorials. Maybe covering more of the course topics.»
- Workload of the labs.»
- The ways deadlines for labs are presented on the homepage, was a little hard to find.»
- Maybe project instead of tentamen. »
- It should include some more information about the current status of present game and film industry.»
- to practice more of what we learn on the lectures.»
- The start of the tutorials. It got a bit stressfull in the end.»
- Often the time wasn"t enough on the lectures. Either skip some info or have more lectures. Hard to focus and understand when something is rushed through.»
- maybe there should be like a group work like a small project or something»
- See above»
- The lectures need to be more coherent and explanations sometimes need to be more clear.»
- Amount of lectures»
- ALl the PDF and help files should be in english»
- Better lab conditions.»
- class explanations»
- Some tutorials because they were so hard for me because I had never seen MVS before.»

16. Additional comments

- I did like this course, but having only one course about computer graphics feels "week". I would suggest having two courses, one basic with "pixelhandling" (raytracing, splines,sampling etc) and one for realtime. I guess this was prety much how it was before with ordinary computer graphics and advanced. This is a really big subject and adressing it by only one 7,5HP course is rather weak.»
- Kanske lite för snabba genomgångar på föreläsningarna, en föreläsning till i veckan hade nog varit att föredra. Jag läste tyvärr inte särskilt mycket på den här kursen, men jag tror att det finns en risk att många personer som har goda förkunskaper går den vilket gör att tempot trissas upp för högt för de som inte hållt på med grafikprogrammering tidigare.»
- Great course! Great teacher!»
- Thanks so much to the lecturer who introduced me the knowledge and supplied me opportunities to have relevant experience.»
- Thank you for an awarding experience and for the knowledge. You were great.»
- good course!»
- Great course»
- The extra summary lecture in the end, as well as the occasional repetitions based on our feedback were both very good ideas.»
- I"ve enjoyed with the course but I think some tutorials were so hard.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från