|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Concrete structures, 2008, VBB048Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-01-19 - 2009-02-02 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60% Kontaktperson: Björn Engström» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time per week over the entire study period.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - The FEM-project took up much time.» (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.83 - acctually around 90%» (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. To what extent have you reached the following goal?The student should be able to:- describe and explain how forces are distributed and redistributed in statically indeterminate structures with regard to cracking, plastic deformations, time dependent deformations, prestressing and restraint.. 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 4. To what extent have you reached the following goal?The student should be able to- describe and explain how second order moment in axially loaded slender elements is influenced by cracking, plastic deformations and time dependent deformations. 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.11 - It would be good to spent a littel more time on this, we only used one lecture and had 2 examples.» (40-60%) 5. To what extent have you reached the following goal?The student should be able to:- analyse the non-linear behaviour of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures by various approaches considering needed accuracy, load level and available information. 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.94 - large part of this should have been learned by the computer assignment, which as known did not gave any good results» (60-80%) 6. To what extent have you reached the following goal?The student should be able to:- perform non-linear FE-analysis of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures and interpret the results. 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 - Again the project was to not orginized well enough and there was a missunderstandi between Mario and Hamid (like in the Steel course) about the ability of Abacus.» (20-40%) 7. To what extent have you reached the following goal?The student should be able to:- describe and explain how intrinsic deformation (shinkage and/or thermal strain) in restrained concrete elements results in stresses and cracking.. 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.16 8. To what extent have you reached the following goal?The student should be able to:- analyse the risk of cracking and the cracking response in fundamental cases of restraint loading. 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.11 - Should be given more empahasis as this is often overlooked in practice and it would be a valuble skill for an engineer to have a good understanding in this field.» (60-80%) 9. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 10. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.05 11. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?The examination consists of "dugga", project work and final exam.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.38 - I think that I have learnt more than what my results show, but there is always stress factor on the exams. » (To some extent) Teaching and course administration12. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 - the lectures were excellent: The topics were well explained and exercises helped much to understand» (Great extent) 13. To what extent has the FEM project been of helf for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Since we had problems getting FE results, the FE-analysis did not add very much to the general understanding...» (Some extent) 14. To what extent has the course literature and other course material been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.44 15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.77 - I would have been good if the FEM lectures would have been uploaded to the homepage before the lectures.» (Rather well) Study climate16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - The teachers could not help us on the FEM part. » (Rather good) 17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 18. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?It is assumed that 50% of the time is used for Concrete structures.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - Läste ju iofs endast en kurs men antar att hade lagt merparten av studie-tiden på denna kursen.» (60-80%) 19. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - The FE project took a lot of time due to problems with the program itself. That´,s quite unfortunate because that time could used (better) doing exercises etc.» (High) Summarizing questions20. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - Gives good insight and increses the "feeling" for how structures behave in reality.» (Good) 21. What is the remaining value of the course in the future18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - Känns som att om man skall jobba med betongkonstruktioner är denna kurs oumbärlig för att till fullo förstår konstruktionens beteende.» (Very high) 22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the lectures and exercises»- Examples during the lectures.» - The "Dugga" is very good as it is. It"s good to know the theory before studying for the exam. Lectures works very well too, especially doing problems» - I princip allt. FEM-projektet bör ses över dock. Själva uppgiften i sig var väldigt intressant men tyvärr väldigt svårt att genomföra. Hade det varit enklare att få analyserna att fungera och tydligare information om hur man extraherar relvanta resultat hade FEM-projektet varit till en stor hjälp vad gäller att förstå elementets beteende.» - DUGGA» - The Björn part of the course is good and the examples are good, the FEM project sould be preserved but improved.» - The lectures and the material that was handed out were excellent. The dugga was also a very good way of learning the theoretical part of the course.» - Bjorn Engstrom» 23. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the FEM project, the task must be solvable and at least the supervisors should know how to handle the FE-program. »- FEM-project.» - The way that the FEM-project is done. It was too much work in comparison to what was gained in knowledge. » - More preparation from the teachers on the FEM part. I would have been good if the teachers had done the modelling and analysis by themself, so they know how to solve them (or if it could be solved). » - FEM Project, however it is a good idea.» - The FEM project should be improved. Marions lectures were ambitious which is good but we haven’,t been thought many basic concepts in FEM modeling because all FEM project in the program have had problems so many of Marios lessons were to advanced to give better understanding.» - The project work can be more clear and maybe be reorganized in some way.» - Change Abaqus» - The FE project would have been very interesting if the results were obtained. A better guidance for how to use Abaqus for non linear analysis of concrete is necessary. » - The primary syllabus for the FEM part of the course was set too heavy and demanded a lot of workload (BTW, it changed as the course progressed and some parts were dismissed). So, I suggest that the FEM part to be modified to comply with the available timeframe.» - A better preparation of the FEM-projects. I found that sometimes the teachers had problem giving adequate instructions and help during the project work.» 24. Additional comments- As mentioned above the FEM projects have not been good in this program. In period 2 we have a FEM Basics course which is a good introduction to the theory and a necessary part of the education I feel. Then we go straight to advanced modeling in Abacus in the Timber course and following courses. In my opinion there is a big piece missing in the FEM education as the gap between the FEM Basics course and the projects is too big. My suggestion is to introduce the students to FEM modeling with Abacus (or other) in the FEM applications course instead of making them do more Mathlab programming, in this way they are better equipped to perform the FEM projects and will get a lot more out of the projects themselves when they are using a tool (Abacus) that they are familiar with and can manipulate to achieve the best result from there projects.»- Very high workload, the "heaviest" corse I"ve taken. I was lucky to just take one course this period, otherwise I don´,t know how I would have made it...» - thanks to all the teachers for the educative and interesting course.» - The only problem I felt was the gap when Mario came for FE lectures. And then afetr a week again Bjorn came fro lectures. Otherwise there wasnt anything difficukt there.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5%