ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Passive Safety 2008, MMF210

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-01-18 - 2009-02-18
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Johan Davidsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 15%
Around 20 hours/week»6 30%
Around 25 hours/week»10 50%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»3 15%
75%»6 30%
100%»10 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Closer to 100 than 75» (100%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Svårt att veta vad man måste kunna när det är en massa statistik och fakta som föreläsaren säger är onödig. lite tydligare Studiemål som måste uppnås. T.ex göra en lista med mål som måste uppnås. Boken är oxå svår att läsaeftersom det är så mycket fakta hela tiden. lite tydligare vad målet med kursen är. Antingen fakta eller förståelse. och hur mycket av varje.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 90%
No, the goals are set too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- a bit too high considering the number of aspects to see. It would be perfect it we had more hours of class during two quarters and one more lab.» (No, the goals are set too high)
- Considering that we are not supposed be have learned biomechanics before, the content is quite large, specialy because we have to learn it in 2 months maximum...» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 25%
Yes, definitely»14 70%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- the exams was not hard but it was hard to remember averything we had seen, so the grades could have been a little less "harsch".» (Yes, definitely)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»5 25%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Teaching is not done by only flipping slides.» (Small extent)
- Sometimes it felt like it was enough to just read the power point presentations, because of the bad teaching skills of some lecturers.» (Some extent)
- Mycket trevliga labbhandledare och hjälpsamma.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»8 40%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Lession handouts was used a lot but not the book that much» (Small extent)
- Interesting book, but it only covered some of the course.» (Some extent)
- The course literature was interesting but too goes a little bit to deep.» (Some extent)
- Boken är tydligt avdelad i olika avsnitt. dock mycket svåra ord. en engelsk-svensk ordlista hade varit bra. Google och tyda på internet fungerar inte så bra!» (Large extent)
- The book and the lectures are clear, and are very good sources for learning and to be able to do well on the exam, but the lectures are of course very helpful as well.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 10%
Rather well»11 55%
Very well»7 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Som alltid kommer handoutsen alldeles för sent. det bästa vore att lägga upp allt läsvecka ett så att man kan förbereda sig och printa ut allt på en gång. Det finns ingen möjlighet att printa ut allt kvarten innan lektionen eftersom printrar och datorer fungerar EJ tillfredställande. MINST 7 dagar innan måste det vara utdelat. Döp filerna tydligare. lägg gärna ut dom i kronolologisk ordning. eller dela in dom i mappar.» (Rather badly)
- Good with handouts» (Very well)


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»8 40%
Very good»10 50%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Both Johan and Azra are easy to talk to, and willing to answer questions.» (Very good)
- Very quick answers by e-mail. That"s great.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»6 30%
Very well»12 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- The group work worked quite well, but some members were quite lazy sometimes, and one group member didn"t do anything at all.» (Rather well)
- Some people in the group do have a lack of go-ahead, making the work load uneven.» (Rather well)
- (well, some people in the group worked less than others.. Did much thinking, less talking/writing)» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»14 70%
High»4 20%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The project is good, the workload is high just because of the large content.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»5 25%
High»10 50%
Too high»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Part of Formula student as well...» (Too high)


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»2 10%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»8 40%
Good»6 30%
Excellent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- More focus on machinemechanics, less on biomechanics» (Poor)
- One of the worst courses I have taken part to. Poor lectures, sometime the lecturers talked about the same things. Too much biomechanics for a introduction course.» (Poor)
- Too much focus on bio-mechanics! Change the course to next year so it covers more vehicle design, how passive systems works, what passive systems there are etc.» (Fair)
- Lite enformig ibland med en massa powerpiontpresentationer. många presentationer sa samma saker emellanåt eftersom ingen visste vad de andra föreläsarna hade sagt. Överlag bra föreläsare, ibland lite snurrigt när engelskan blev för dålig - men det är svårt att göra något åt det. Labben var rolig i den bemärkelse att vi inte fick så mycket ledtrådar - fortsätt med det!» (Adequate)
- All of the guestlecturers need to talk before they have the lecture. A lot of information came back more than twice during the course. Try to limit the slides, it is hard to take in to many small detailes about everything,» (Adequate)
- Above good but below excellent - very good that is!» (Good)
- I didn"t put excellent because everything is perfect in the course, but I feel that the teachers are engaged in the course, which I think is very important. I also think that the guest lectures were very good as well as the lab.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Labben.»
- Guest lectures and the lab.»
- The laboratory work. Very nice to do some experiments with a dummy.»
- The lectures with Rob Thomson, but in more depth. The crash test lab was also interesting.»
- Lab. and guest lecturers»
- laboration-good»
- The lab was good. Both to have an anchor to reality and also think more using different skills from the course»
- The type of questions asked in the exam. Crash test lab!»
- The laboration»
- Laboratory with dummy»
- The laboratory work.»
- extrernal lectures is very good to have in the course due to their knowledge in real life situations.»
- The great coverage of the whole passive safety domain»
- The interventions of guest lecturers.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Gör en ordlista, lägg upp på PPT mycket tidigare, Tydligare Studiemål, fler övningstentor.»
- The examination could be a little bit less difficult.»
- The focus in the course!»
- More focus on machinemechanics, less on biomechanics»
- The statistics should be used to give a idea and the importance of memorizing them should be reduced.»
- Perhaps a more serious presentation of the laborations»
- We were the first group and the dummy was not prepared, so we had to loose 2 hours helping to prepare everything. So I would like a bite more organization in the lab session.»
- Less biomechanics, more of how to construct safe vehicles and crash calculations.»
- ..»
- more labs, and a study period from september to december.»

16. Additional comments

- Interesting course!»
- Large content but really good and interesting course.»


Kursutvärderingssystem från