Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
A4 Space for healthcare, housing and work - Senior housing ht 08 (AUT162)
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-01-15 - 2009-01-30 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54% Kontaktperson: Inga Malmqvist» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.1. Learning outcome 1- Design, as a teamworker, a complex of housing for elderly - Use the concepts of elderly housing and space for care - Take place in a work of programming for space for elderly, combining aspects of spaces for work, care and living6 svarande
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sufficient» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 50% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 2. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?6 svarande
Too small scope in relation to credits» | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable scope in relation to credits» | | 6 | | 100% |
Too wide scope in relation to credits» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2
Education and course administration3. How did the first on the site work?6 svarande
No opinion» | | 1 | | 16% |
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sufficient» | | 4 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - took us some time to get the dwg files, else good» (Sufficient)
4. How did the study visit by bus to hospitals and senior housing work?6 svarande
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sufficient» | | 1 | | 16% |
Excellent» | | 5 | | 83% |
Genomsnitt: 4.83 - Great tripp, we could see what we would like to see» (Excellent)
5. How did the midcrits work?6 svarande
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 2 | | 33% |
Sufficient» | | 4 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - Insufficient because if you did not sit next to the presenting person you did not see something. It would have been better to hang the papers on the wall or have a powerpoint-presentation» (Insufficient)
- Didnt get any real feedback, but good feelings about the works:-) thats good do» (Insufficient)
- there could be more time for presentation and discussion» (Sufficient)
- I expected more critics both from teachers and other people. More interest from everybody.» (Sufficient)
6. What is your opinion about the full-scale laboration?6 svarande
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sufficient» | | 2 | | 33% |
Excellent» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 4.66 - But we should have a nurse there that shows us how to taje care of somebody. I personally have no experience in that.» (Excellent)
- more of those kind of reality practice, » (Excellent)
- there could be more wide scope of disabilities considered (being blind, not hearing, etc.)» (Excellent)
7. How did the external presentation work?6 svarande
No opinion» | | 1 | | 16% |
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sufficient» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - Very nice, but sad to have no return from the spectators.» (Sufficient)
- But it would have been better to know that we will have a microphone. It creates some trouble, that would not have been necessary.» (Excellent)
8. How did the crits work?6 svarande
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Insufficient» | | 0 | | 0% |
Sufficient» | | 1 | | 16% |
Excellent» | | 5 | | 83% |
Genomsnitt: 4.83 - It was VERY nice to have a guest» (Excellent)
- I very much appreciate the quest"s opinion on our projects, they were very fresh» (Excellent)
9. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?6 svarande
Very little» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather little» | | 3 | | 50% |
Rather big» | | 2 | | 33% |
Very big» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 - something in between, it was a nice book, but maybe not so focused on the elderly.» (Rather little)
- Not much in English» (Rather little)
- Share the opinion with other people from different country.» (Rather big)
10. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?6 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 66% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 33% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.33
Work environment11. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?6 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 83% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 16% |
I have not asked for assistance» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - It was not very well because sometimes after asking I feel as helpless as before. Critics have not been always critics, sometimes it was not helpful to talk.» (Rather well)
- But the air in the studio been of bad quality.» (Very well)
12. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?6 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 16% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 66% |
I have not tried to cooperate» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Concluding questions13. What is your overall opinion of the course?6 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Passed» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 4 | | 66% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 14. What should be preserved next year?- Fullscale laboration, real clients»
- The differents travels around sweden and also denmark.»
- the full scale laboration, the field trips»
- The working process and organisation. Site, client, diferent labs and finally the presentation. Really interesting and complete.»
- Seminars and field trip (makes students get more in contact)»
15. What shuold be changed the nest year?- studio, final delivery before christmas-holidays»
- It could be nice if the studio will have more furniture like a sofa... so as to improve contact with students.»
- possibly another room choosen for students to work in»
- I really miss more exchange between the students. Some of us work in teams and it was great and I have learnt a lot from my mate. But I have REALLY missed a group feeling. Maybe we should have work all together in the first part of the project, studying the site and the place and later defining the program together(because that was in common for everyone). In that way we could have started knowing each other from the beggining, and knowing how the other works.. That could be one possibility, I dont know. I would have like to have more team and group feeling and exchange with everybody, our studio was a little bit cold.»
- The studio classroom. To small for all of us, bad air ventilation»
16. Other comments- A practical part of working with old people would be a nice experience. »
- Very nice experience, i am really glad having choose this studio.»
- Sometimes I had the feeling that although it was interesting few lectures from the hospital group were not so useful for the senior housing group. Regarding what I"ve written before for example it would have been interesting to have comments from the people of the hospitals and listen to their ideas (and of course, the same for them with ours). The more exchange the more you learn, and yes, we were in the same room, but we didnt see very often our mate"s projects.
Also, maybe this is because I"m used to work dealing with a lot of topics, but it would have been interesting to exchange ideas with other studios, for example, in the last part of our project we were ask about sustainability, we could have get some correspondents in the master of sustainable development in order to work together (and they could have listen to our view of the eldery society for their project in Lysekil).»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|