|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Course evaluation - Quality and Operations Management, TEK145Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2007-10-25 - 2007-11-09 Antal svar: 33 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62% Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.42 - The work load has been higher then the average of previous courses i have taken.» (Around 30 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.69 - Was away for one week, attended all classes exept for that week» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 - I might at some point read the goals but i can not remember them right now. They have not been discussed frequently in class as far as i know» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.88 - I think Chalmers in general should strive for higher standards» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.13 - If you had a good memory, you would achieve a good score otherwise you barely pass.
Unfortunately the emphasis of exams was to memorizing the points!» (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.51 - The teaching varies a lot because we had 4 different professors and each of them has a different technique and in my opinion some of their techniques are not adequate. Better time-management for presentations and literature presentation» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.87 - Even some articles might not be interesting or that related to the main subject» (Large extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.03 - File uploading was not clear in the beginning. Feedback only to the person who uploads the file. Personal uploading should be changed for team uploading. It seems there is no communication between the department and teachers (they don"t know about other activities/grades/methods). Printed handouts should be available also on electronic format» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.81 - Since everybodies look like they are quite busy, personally I dont have much opportunities» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.15 - There were a lot of difficulties within the groups.» (Rather poorly) 11. How was the course workload?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.27 - The content was way too easy and unchallenging but the quantity was too large. Some of the exercises didn"t feel like they were designed for the level of study that we should have. Also: shouldn"t the exercises be about practiciing theory and not just common sense? I felt that I could have used made some of the exercises in grade school with good results.
Prof. Bergman"s exercises were exceptions as they required some thinking although clearer instructions would have been desirable.» (Low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.24 - Same as in question 11.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.24 - The content and aims are great, but the execution is rather weak. I"m a little discontent about the lack of respect my peers had to the teachers and the other students. The general disorder when someone asked a question begged for disciplinary actions but none are given.
Also the exercises lack connection to the theory which is bad.» (Fair) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Visits and presentations outside Chalmers»- The exercises we did, for example with the KJ-method in week 7. It felt really good to do some exercises/practical things despite all the reading. And it is a good way of learning I think.» - The intro, "social", week was good. But should have been spread for a longer time maybe. Too much right in start. Was a little bit frustrating.» - Group work» - To hard for me to say» - the first week with the social activities were very great to know each other» - The seminars were good. I especially enjoyed the seminars with prof Par Ahlstrom. The selection of the articles were good overall. The strategy week and the change management week had excellent articles. But the product development week and service operations week had weak articles. The book by prof Bergman is excellent as well.» - Think it through before ...» - Not having so many cases to work on beacuse we didn"t have time to make them good or study to the exame. I think it"s better to have maybe to big cases instead. Another thing is the mandatory classes. I think that it"s important to let students study in the way that fitts them. » - The group work» - the work load should be realistic» - the structure of the weeks was very good, in terms of being introduced to a concept, and then apply this concept in the group assignments.» - Literature Seminars» - a) the maintenance and update of student portal page. b) interesting articles as part of the learning material, eg. Sverker"s c) the exam questions by Sverker has been the most interesting and very helpful in understanding the course. we"ll need more questions as those in order to understand the course better, and not just memorise literature for exams. d) flexibility of lecture hours (limited hours per day) e) one group work title per week f) one literature seminar per week » - I think the most improtant thing is the student to choose his/her orientation in this program,in which field to go further,then I think it"s good for student to strengthen on the subject.» - seminar litteratures» - The mixture of all the subjects in the course.» - 1) i have heard that the some studebt are complainig about the work load, but i think that all management courses have hight work load, so it seems not to be a big problem. 2)Literature seminars 3)Mini Projects 4)Presentations» - this course was a very quick glance with a lot work, and materials. for the next year it could be with more ditails and to some extent less material. so that student could learn the subjects with more ditails, not just a glance without depth tearning. this course for us did not let to react.» - Literature seminars! Introduction week with all activities! Clear course schedule, Group works, » - Like a well seminar discussion and teamwork.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The course lacks of organization between teachers and administration. There is no time management for presentations (students) and teachers. There should be more discussion/application of the literature instead of repeating the literature in class. Use of technology (i.e. software for DoE, normal probability plot on paper????)»- I think the amount of "examinations" during the weeks were a bit too much. Because of the lots of time spend with groupwork I sometimes had not enough time to prepare my individual work (literature) for the lectures, and therefore I didn"t understood things in the lectures, and so on... Better and more exam examples for the midterm exam, I didn"t really knew what to expect then.» - Coordination between teachers.» - The read thread. In the first weeks there were alot of abbreviations that was explained leter in the course. » - To hard for me to say» - to my mind students need some time to prepare for exam. this year we had enough time before the second exam and we haven"t got any before the firts. that should be definitely changed» - It is not necessary to pass exams with all the assignments we do each week» - 1)Decrease the scope of the course, or split the course into 2 or several courses. 2)Increase the depth of the topics. 3)Have fewer but more relevant exercises.» - focus on lecturing also and more industrial visits and industrial based projects rather than summarizing articles,» - Less cases mandatory classes» - Less literature/more specific assigned literature. Less mandatory lectures.» - a short course for statistics should be provided» - you should review the timeline and workload of the course, so either you reduce the topics covered, or you give the students more time if you want to keep the same workload.» - a) probabilistic questionnaire b) on-time announcement of group work results/grades c) more time before exam for preparation » - I think we need to balance the workload, such as the exam and the total number of projects, this is also for insuring the quality of the project. » - the workload » - less projects, maybe it is becuase the course is divided by different parts and teached by different teacher, but definitely you have to reduce the number of the projects, maybe with two or more bigger ones, but at least not with one small each week. It was too hard to think deeper and get fully understood on what we used.» - The mandatory classes should be reduced. The workload should be reduced BUT the goals should be set higher. More quality and less quantity!» - 1) Statisticaly quality control should be offered alongwith this course. 2) Practical examples should be included. 3) Every time going to VOLVO becomes boring. 4) Another good and in easy language should be teh focus instead of green book.» - the group projects» - i said in the previous one» - Think about the workload! Prepare the students better for the examination. They will definitely work hard to pass it, but you should give them hints to be better prepared. Bo Bergman should try to make a break exactly after 45min. That helps Students to be more attentive.» - I would underline and insist on the statistical things. We haven"t done so many calculation.» - Bigger projects should be given instead of small projects.» 16. Additional comments- Better contact between the teachers. »- Thank you for a good course!» - Look at the affinity diagram that one group did at Sverkers KJ-shiba lesson. There you will find additional info. Now I just want to forget this course and hope for the future.» - I think the schedule should be clear several weeks before the courses start, including information about whether or not the courses are mandatory. Especially for the international students...as they make plans for travelling (e.g. to go home) according to the schedule.» - too much work at home and no backgrount in statistics were the biggest problems for everybody» - i found this experience (the course) very usefull. at the begining i had some problems for the fact that the teaching system is quite different than the system i was enrolled in, but after getting used, i found it exciting and so usefull.» - The propalistic questions of Bo part were very confusing. As English is our second language (both students & Professor, these questions may lead us to wrong answers because of misinterpretion of English.» - i am very impressed with some of the articles handed out for reading and literature seminars. i have gained much knowledge thru them, and would be interested in reading more, related to future courses. Limited to 2 or less articles a week would be efficient. Thank you.» - Thanks for listening to us.» - Overall very good endeavour. Teachers are very nice and helping. Other staff is very cooperative also. » - I like this programm. It seems actually well organized, teacher are enthusiastic, well prepared, good guest lectures... »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%