Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Construction Contract Relationships, TEK 140

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-01-20 - 2009-01-30
Antal svar: 30
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Anna Kadefors»

Your background

1. Which is your earlier educational background?

30 svarande

Swedish: Chalmers»16 53%
Swedish: other university»0 0%
Foreign»14 46%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

30 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 6%
Around 20 hours/week»10 33%
Around 25 hours/week»14 46%
Around 30 hours/week»3 10%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- I guess there somewhere, some weeks it was more work on this course, and some weeks more on the MOCI» (Around 20 hours/week)
- Most of the time was spent on working with the project.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- Note that the group work took almost all the time (especially for some of us) which was really disturbing since I had hardly opened the book/ looked at the slidies thouroughly until threee days before the exam. » (Around 30 hours/week)
- The book of Winch is a very good tool to understand, but i Think that the vocabulary has to be deliver from the begining and not the day before the exam. And give more importance to the reading of "CHOOSING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING METHOD" by Christopher M. Gordon, which explain easy the diference between the two types of contracts and its variations. » (At least 35 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

30 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 6%
75%»8 26%
100%»20 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- Often I chose to not attend at class because of I felt that working with the two projects were more important. » (50%)
- The best lecture was with Nathalie Bretz, simple an easy to understand. The lectures related to law are hard to follow. » (100%)
- Jag tycker att upprepningen mellan lektionerna var bra. Samma sak poängterades, fast från olika synsätt och detta gav en väldigt bra helhetsbild!» (100%)
- to be accurate, more than 90%» (100%)
- between 95-10 %» (100%)
- I think I missed one lecture due to a doctors apointment. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

30 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»17 56%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- I think that a schedule providing what we are going to learn is good, it can be better if the links between the lectures are explain since the begining. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- for me, actucally i spent lots of time on the project and mainly on learning how to write a conference paper instead of learning the rest. So hope next time better balance could be built about this.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- Vet att ni poängterade att man skulle läsa kursmålen noga, men det verkade som om många missade detta ändå. Jag tycker att det står klart och tydligt vad som krävs om man bara tar sig tid att läsa dokumentet. Kanske till och med att det kan vara bra att läsa det två gånger så att man verkligen förstår allt. Så gjorde i alla fall jag.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

30 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»28 93%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

30 svarande

No, not at all»2 6%
To some extent»15 50%
Yes, definitely»12 40%
I have not been examined yet»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The examination could have been more difficult as we learned far more during the study period.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»2 6%
Some extent»13 43%
Large extent»10 33%
Great extent»5 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- The teacher could be more involved in the projects, and I also think that lectures could have been handled more effective and informative. » (Some extent)
- the comments for this could be the same as the one for question no. 4 :-P» (Large extent)
- Of course some better than other, but overall very good. I liked the lectures by Natalie Bretz, the ones on negotiation and also the ones on moral hazard and trust.» (Large extent)
- The lectures was of major help to the exam. » (Large extent)
- Detta är områden som är nya för de flesta av studenterna och därför anser jag att undervisningen var otroligt viktig för en förstålese.» (Great extent)
- The lectures at Mannheimer Swartling were really interesting, keep them for next year.» (Great extent)
- The use of guest lecturers was excellent» (Great extent)

8. What is your opinion of the lectures by Jan Bröchner?

- Funny and giving.»
- To much storytelling and not so clear intention with every lecture.»
- The lectures slides are very graphical and this make difficult to follow if you dont pay attention.»
- most of them were difficult to understand.»
- Bra, skämtar mycket vilket jag gillar, samtidigt som kunskapen är otroligt stor och jag fick svar på alla frågor som poppade upp. Som det ska vara!»
- Quite good, great English and confidence, however when asked to questions further then the program of the class it was hard to get the answer and in case we did, it was quite confusing.»
- Really good lectures»
- It was very nice and I learned many things»
- Good»
- Good lectures, full of examples and applications of theory. A good speeker and lectures that does not rely on the power point but on the speech, which is very good. However it often relies on chapters of Winch Book that we should have read before the lecture. I really tried to do so but after 1 month, it is impossible. Maybe try to keep the level of examples and applications but also try to implement more guidance in theory.»
- Good lectures, though some of them could be more focus oriented (i.e. some of them were a little bit confusing). Bröchner is always very alarmed and enthusiastic which makes him a very good teacher.»
- really good»
- Really interesting and informative.»
- I think mr Bröchner sometimes presented information that is not needed, such as stories, both historical and present.»
- The lectures by Jan were of good quality and easy to follow. »
- A lot of infomation, high speed, but absolutely interesting!»
- i found them interesting because he talks in a way that is funny and attentative.»
- Jan is a very good lecturer, he has a wide knowledge in the subject and his personality definetly contributes to the entertaining value! Perfect english as well.»
- Enertaining and intressting»
- Good lectures and very helpful concerning the groupassignment»
- sometimes good, but sometimes confusing»
- very good»
- Well planned and structured. Good powerpoints»
- Very good, the most easily accesable due to the interesting examples he was always including»
- fine»

9. What is your opinion of the lectures by Anna Kadefors?

- Giving.»
- More clearer, but still a clear purpose, aim and goal must be presented in every lecture and part of the course, and the MOST important thing is to reconnect to the purpose, aim and goal after every finished part. Otherwise you (the teachers) won"t get direct input on your work.»
- Sometimes the terms of this not important, do not pay attention in this..." are answers that a teacher should not use, because create uncertainty and doubts.»
- not so clear and didn"t sound that reasonable that it should be. »
- Samma som ovan, men inte lika mycket skämt kanske! :)»
- The English was very good, the confidence of the issues that she talked about should be bigger once Jan was always correcting her. The discussions that the Professor made us do were very good.»
- Really good lectures»
- I think Anna"s lecture covered many important part of the course and her part was well-orgonazied. »
- Good»
- Good lectures, clear and interesting. Except the lecture on Trust which was a bit too broad and difficult to concentrate on.»
- Very good lectures. Anna is ambitious and a good lecturer. »
- really good»
- interesting and informative»
- Quite good lectures. »
- The lectures By Anna were less comprehensible and more hard to follow. academic language was not evident in the lectures. »
- Catching and easy to listen to, close to reality, gives another perspective. Good. »
- i found them also good since we etablished a connection with the course teachers so it was easy to follow the classes when they had them»
- Anna is also a very good lecturer with a great knowledge in the subject, very good english and great to listen to. Also very involved in the coarse wich is good.»
- Very good»
- Very good,very easy to follow the lectures and Anna was also very helpful concerning problems in the groupassignment. »
- good»
- very good»
- Well planned and structured»
- Again very good, and well linked to academic articles»
- fine»

10. What is your opinion of the lectures by Jeanette Andersson (general contract law)?

- Good.»
- Good, comprehensible and well structured.»
- Difficult to follow if you dont have any clue of Swedish Law. but at the end very good explanation»
- regardless of her way of speaking, the contents was quiet useful to know.»
- Bra.»
- The subject was not one of the best, so I considered it confusing.»
- Interesting, but to deep for us.»
- It was very useful because of the problems she solved in the class.»
- Good»
- The knowledge that is brought to the student is very interesting and important. Sometimes the explanations were a bit confusing but in general it was two good lectures»
- Very good and clear.»
- ok»
- It was of good quality despite the same problem with academic language. »
- A bit boring but the content is important.»
- ok»
- Jeanettes english was poor and her lecturing skills was intermediate. But still she had a good knowledge in the subject, but she had problems with transmiting it to us.»
- Good but tomany simalar slides»
- It was very interesting, could have been a bit more about this though. »
- good»
- missed it.»
- Really bad, did not address content to audince, just talked/read straight from the law book.»
- Very interesting, as i had little previous knowledge here. Jeanette made what i thought was a difficult and dull area thorughly understandable»
- fine»

11. What is your opinion of the first lecture on construction law (by Nathalie Bretz)?

- Good.»
- Din not attend to this lecture.»
- Excellent lecture, but the lecture has to follow and order in the slides handout»
- one of the useful lectures we had»
- Lite torr, hade lite svårt att lyssna och hålla motivationen uppe.»
- informative»
- I am satisfied with that»
- Great, crystal clear about how should the things done according to the construction law.»
- Interesting one. A good link between theory and reality. The knowledge brought to the student was very interesting too.»
- Very good and clear.»
- good»
- Good information presented»
- The lectures were fine and easy to follow. provided with suitable examples supporting the cases.»
- Very good, a heavy load of information but nevertheless very useful such.»
- vague memory of that»
- Her way of lecturing, perfect knowledge, good examples and perfect english made this lecture one of the best ones througout the coarse!»
- Good»
- This was the lecture I missed so unfortunatley I can´,t answer that question. »
- interesting»
- missed it»
- Interesting, but could have more real life examples.»
- Very good, with excellent explanation of the swedish system»
- fine»

12. What is your opinion of the construction law lectures at the Mannheimer Swartling office?

- Nice environment, good lecture.»
- Good with real life experience»
- Good to see the real world and applications but the first lecture was boring due to the lack of experience of the young lawyer.»
- one of the useful lectures we had, but lecturers level of English was a shortcoming »
- Kul att vara i en annan miljö! Återigen ett annat synsätt!!»
- Quite long, with a lot of opened questions that he couldn"t tell us how did end up, so this made the lecture a bit boring, once we could never get a final result. Could be presented in a different way without mentioning these cases.»
- The best lectures about contract law»
- I got nothing from that lecture, especially the first person.»
- Sorry for saying that, i did not join the lecture.»
- Very interesting, especially for the second part with the case study. The first part was repeating what Nathalie Bretz presented the week before.»
- Unfortunately I was not there.»
- to motivate the students it is really good to have visits like this, interesting information»
- nice to have lecture in a new environment»
- did not attend»
- They were Useless . and repetitive. »
- Good, even though one of them seemed a little bit confused. Important subject.»
- very interesting.even made me think of studying something extra about that»
- Well, it was more interesting to get to go to an office than the actual lectures. There were good but not great.»
- Very good and nice to change environment»
- Very interesting, and should be continued»
- It was good. The first part was a bit more interesting though, didn´,t really follow the case studies, but otherwise good!»
- really good»
- very good»
- Interesting, learned a lot when they applied things to real life examples»
- These i unfortunately did not attend»
- If you mean lecture in office up to the nordea bank, useless! repetative»

13. What is your opinion of the guest lecture session (Fredrik Wahlqvist and Kjell Arefjäll)?

- Good.»
- Very good when two parts present thier view on the same thing.»
- NEgotiation, excellent lecture, he is a sales man, and knew how to do the lecture good and fascinating but at the end the audience was exhausted with to much information and they leave the class because the slides contained all the information »
- one of the useful lectures we had one of the useful lectures we had, but lecturers level of English was a shortcoming »
- Kanske den bästa gästföreläsningen. Kul att de var sådana motpoler. Gav en förståelse för hur olika parter ser på partnering!»
- quite interesting the different point of view of an experienced person and a younger one.»
- Kjell"s held a really good lecture. Fredrik"s lecture was just commercial for ncc»
- It was very useful and intresting due to their different ideas. I think further lectures as such could help students to learn widely »
- Good»
- I wasn"t there.»
- Quite good lectures»
- really good, having to lecturers speeking about basically the same topic, gave an interesting view»
- do not remember Fredrik but Kjell"s lecture was really good.»
- The diverging poninions made it extra interesting. A bit without an edge from Wahlqvist, did not make a strong impression. »
- it was interesting too to get 2 perspectives of 1 thing»
- I am very disapointed, but this is the only lectur I missed, and have heard from classmates that it was very good.»
- Very interesting to see partnering from two sides »
- Good to hear diffrent opinions and not just the "sweet-talk", Of course there is two sides of every story but good that it actually was proven. »
- interesting»
- missed it»
- Interesting, learned a lot when they applied things to real life examples. Funny that Kjell commented Fredriks lack of daily life connection.»
- Highly entertaining, but also very informative. t was excellent to get the two differing opinions from industry in the same day»
- Best lecture in this course»

14. What is your opinion of the lectures on Negotiations?

- Very interesting.»
- Initially good, then they became more and more repeatative.»
- useless and complicated especially when it comes to the exam assigning 10 points to this subject is not fair at all.»
- Jäkligt kul snubbe som levererade på ett väldigt pedagogiskt sätt. Satt med uppspärrade ögon båda lektionerna! bra!»
- Very good, more interesting in the beginning then in the end of the presentation that he had prepared. There were a lot of issues presented that I still haven"t ever though about.»
- Really really good! A new and interesting subject.»
- It was good and intresting»
- Interesting.»
- Two very good lectures. A very good speaker. However the second lecture was so full of knowledge that it was difficult to catch all the information in one session. Maybe three lectures could have been better.»
- Very good and interesting lectures»
- really interesting»
- ok»
- Very good, one of the best. Interesting and motivating.»
- The lectures were completely useful and added new understandings about the issue. »
- Interesting, rather different from what we as engineers are used to learn. »
- vague memory of that»
- They we"re good, the lecturer was interesting to listen to and had great knowledg in the subject.»
- ok»
- These were among the best lectures within the course. It was fun to see how people think and good that the lecturer gave us small assigments to think of to understand how it really is. »
- interesting»
- This was the best part.»
- To far away from real negotitation situations. Had been good with some practise»
- Perhaps a little slow but maybe this is because english is my native language. They covered the subject well»
- interesting»

15. What is your opinion of the study visit to the Hallandsås project?

- Ok.»
- Initially good, then they became more and more repeatative. Hard to understand why some of the parts where at all connected to our course.»
- I am impressed how the companies are interest in show the real work done during the project. »
- completely useless»
- not neccesary»
- Intressant!»
- Quite disappointed, not only because a lot of people didn"t show up, but also because almost everything that we"ve made there (with exception to the visit to the place to see the construction field and the exposition around the lecture hall) could have been done at Chalmers. Maybe make something a little bit more different (having in mind that this is already different) could make it more interesting.»
- Unimportant»
- I could not attennd at that visit»
- Sorry for saying that, i did not join the lecture.»
- A very good initiative! And to do again. Of course, everybody was disappointed not to see the tunnel and have direct explanations on site. The lectures were very interesting in general. However it was difficult to be concentrated until the end!»
- Unfortunately, I could not join the trip to Hallandsås»
- not very interesting, could be more relevant informations »
- what is the use of sitting on a bus for 3 hours, when you are not allowed to go into the tunnel? in my opinon really useless...»
- nice trip, quite "bad" lectures. It felt like the lecturers just scratched the surface and gave us general information.»
- It was of no use. the lecturers could have came here with less expense for the institute . »
- It is appreciated that the people working there take their time to meet us. Would have been fun to see more of the tunnel. The development of the project, the way they described it, was interesting.»
- not so useful,since the information we got to know there, i already kind of knew it.»
- The visit was great, all the lectures were good, but the total time of lectures throughout the day was a little bit too long.. Obviously it would have been great to go into the tunnel, but that is exteemly hard to arrange, but keep trying :-)»
- It feels a bit unessasery to do a long buss trip without seeing the site. »
- Fun trip, but not necessary. The idea is good, but use a better example. Takes too much time travel there, is more about their project and the difficulties they have had, instead of course related information.»
- It was fun. It could have been a bit more showing us around, because it felt kind of unnecessary to travel in a bus several hours to sit in a lecture hall. But the lecturers did a very good job. »
- not so relevant»
- good.»
- Waste of time since we did not go in to the tunnel»
- A highlight, as i had little previous knowledge of this case and my background is in geotechnical engineering»
- useless, boring. only risk management was reasonably good. I expected more. »

16. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»2 6%
Some extent»7 23%
Large extent»18 60%
Great extent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- If I had more time I guess I could have used it a bit better. » (Some extent)
- I only found at the end that most of the lectures (and I"ve been to all) were not that much important to the exam. The book and it"s content and the articles were much more important when it come to the Exam. Maybe is a difference between Sweden and other countries. But in my opinion the classes should be more important to the exam.» (Large extent)
- Very useful, but just too much to read :-(» (Large extent)
- I red the book closely, and it is very interesting. Unfortunately the exam did not asked question from it.» (Large extent)
- Some sets of slides have been really useful.» (Large extent)

17. What is your opinion of the course book by Winch: Managing Construction Projects?

- Good»
- Good»
- Good book but the english level has to be advanced to get some terms.»
- That was a great book, but, was not that much related to our course.»
- t is difficult to understand what he want to say and there must be better books to read for contract relationships rather than a book that is for project management.»
- good»
- Bra, men något svårläst!»
- The book seems good but there must be some different incentives to make people read it before the classes. Do never forget that the literature of both courses (books and articles) were quite long, so that is one of the reasons we didn"t read it all, because the group work was also quite long.»
- You didn"t have to read the book to pass the exam.»
- I think Winch book was really hard to understand»
- Great one, but better understand could gain when more time available to read it.»
- A very good book. Full of interesting knowledge. The knowledge is clearly explained and the book is well written. To keep!»
- Very good and not too theoretical, it goes straight to the point»
- liked it a lot!»
- good book»
- see above»
- The book was hard to follow and written in complicated sentences. There are many other books with the same content but written in a better way . »
- I liked it, even though the time spend with it was a little to less....»
- found the book very interesting to read»
- Sure it a good book, but the information is mixed with too many examples.»
- Good but a bit hard to read.»
- Good»
- A good book, both to the exam and the groupassignment»
- could be better»
- very good book, easy to read and clear content. »
- Good, it was good that there was such clear connection from AK,JB leactures»
- Very good, i liked the numerous case studies, but some terms seemed to get confused with those used in other course materials»
- please change it! I was difficult to read. I think you could find better book»

18. What is your opinion of the documents on a European Civil Code for Service Contracts?

- Good»
- not read»
- Ok.»
- Interesting»
- it was not useful as enough»
- Really did not read, not sure if we had it in English»
- A bit tricky to read.»
- Good»
- ok»
- It was good and enough»
- Do not actually remember them very clearly, but the slides were good and contained much of the information needed (and referred to the most important parts of the European Civil Code)»
- dont remember them that well»
- Never read them, too much "legal" text, which I think is boring..»
- ok»
- It was interesting when you actually sat down and read it through. It was a bit hard to take in though. »
- good»
- Boring and hard to read»

19. What is your opinion of the scientific articles?

- Massive, with low amount of information of importance.»
- reasonable»
- Jättebra komplement till boken!»
- Interesting»
- To be honest! I did not read them as Winch book reading took my whole time»
- Good to read through.»
- They are interesting to read, to complete the knowledge of the book. But they are to read after having read the Winch Book.»
- Most of them were quite good and helpful.»
- ok»
- Unfortunately, I did not have time to read many of them since writing, editing and restructuring the report was the only thing I did the last three weeks (did not realize the work load caused by the report the first weeks, and of course I´,m a bit naturally lazy as well...:) ) »
- they were good and useful with the following excercises we had»
- They we"re good.»
- ok»
- Some of them where more interesting than the others. »
- good»
- very good.»
- Reasonable good»
- Very useful for project work»
- we need more feedback on our assignments, we spent a quarter on these courses but feedback is really poor»

20. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

30 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»15 50%
Very well»15 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- You should though maybe use the folder option on the home page to sort the documents in "hand-outs"» (Very well)
- Very, very good feedback on everything as well, thanks!» (Very well)
- It was very nice of Anna to print out the power points before every lecture. » (Very well)
- good to get handouts for the lectures so you can make notes during the lecture» (Very well)

Group assignment

21. What is your opinion of the group assignment in general (usefulness, topics...)

- Not time enough because of the MOCI course.»
- Good»
- It was good to have companies relationships, but 5 members is a team is hard to put all to work there is a loaf. »
- good»
- quite good»
- Svårt att dela upp jobbet inom gruppen i vissa fall.........»
- Good but very confusing in the beginning.»
- Almost felt like that we only scratched the surface of the topic because we didn"t have enough time.»
- The purpose of group assignment was not as clear as MOCI course!»
- Very helpful to learn about how to write a conference paper compare with learning the culture issues and etc.»
- The group assignement is a good way to learn by doing. However it would be better to analyse contracts by the written documents and how it is applied, rather than having a general point of view of a project. This kind of knowledge is often get in other courses with other projects.»
- The topic was good and by doing the project it increased my interest for the course subject and encourage me to read the course book»
- think the CCR group assignment suffered a bit from the MOCI assignment, because the were scheduled basically at the same time.»
- maximum 3 students in each group!!!»
- It was good. The topic was in accordance with the goals. »
- Unfair and time-consuming. Be aware of the students very varying abilities of writing a report. The original idea is good, and it is interesting to visit a project, but it takes far too much time from your individual time that you want to spend at the course. Perhaps there is a possibility to make the group assignment smaller?»
- it was very useful with the intervieews and all..»
- Great to get to go out to companies!!!!! Makes you more motivated to to a good job than jus doing an entierly literature based work.»
- Good to do a study of a real case»
- Good, but takes up a lot of time.»
- The actual assignment was really good, and we got in great contact with our company. »
- could be better arranged. We would appreciated two meetings with supervisor so the group can get feedback during the project. »
- Very good and I learnt a lot.»
- Useful but the companies intervied did not prepare anything even though we called them in advance. They need to be better informed from beginning what is excpected of them»
- I found this very interesting, but one of the more specific projects the other groups completed may have been better. This is not a fault of the course administration however, as i was late to register »
- I wasnt satisfy of your grading and evaluation. Assignment was good but I think you should find better cases.»

22. What is your opinion on the supervision?

29 svarande

Good»9 31%
Neutral»18 62%
Bad»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- Did no use supervision» (?)
- Skitbra!» (Good)
- As mentioned earlier, it was very good!» (Good)
- We got good help from both Anna and Jan. » (Good)
- Help was always available and emails were answered promptly» (Good)
- Could be better to have more.» (Neutral)
- Since each group did not have a booked time with the supervisor (only a time in the class room with other groups as well) it was a little bit repelling to use it properly. But the supervisor was though helpful and always ready to answer emails» (Neutral)
- Look how Pernilla Gluch has managed it,a quite good structure.» (Neutral)
- could have had it more often» (Neutral)
- We did not acctually benefit from Jan here, he was unfortuntly not very involed in the assignment, but Anna help a lot.» (Neutral)

23. How did the collaboration work in your group?

30 svarande

Good»19 63%
Neutral»9 30%
Bad»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.43

- Is hard to coordinate 5 people, and unfortunately the level of english between foreign student and swedish is huge. And the Swedish student got frustrated to see the progress. » (Good)
- groups are better to be formed by student themselves rather to be assigned by teachers» (Good)
- Due to the same group for both courses we could manage both of them very well» (Good)
- Get lots of help from the groupmates, maybe not conduct very much as really not have so much knowledge compare with the groupmates :-(» (Good)
- A very good collaboration between the group members. Except for one who did nothing. A self assessment of each group member on his other group members, as in MOCI course, could be a solution to avoid this kind of behavior.» (Good)
- We had a erally good atmosphere in the group and everyone really wanted to contribute.» (Good)
- The collaboration was good, but I"m still tired of the differences of knowledge within the program. I mean, if you"re in your fourth year of university studies, you don"t wan"t to start teaching people in your group the basic outline of a report or how english scentences are built up!!! Seriously, adopt a language requirement to pass in order to get into the program! Other universities have them, for example I had to have at least a grade of B in a cambridge exam in advanced english to get into a university in Sydney i studied at last year..» (Good)
- It was not that good because each of us see the bad sides of the others. It is important that you are the ones creating groups but maybe I was unlucky this time...» (Neutral)
- some take free-rides......» (Neutral)
- Too many wishes that could not agree on anything. Also some people in our group had wishes but was not willing to take responsibility for it. But i guess in the end it worked out pretty ok, we just had to put some things aside to get things finished. » (Bad)

24. What is your opinion of the final presentation?

- Good.»
- Good»
- Sometimes do not reflect all the time invested in the project. And the oposition was a good idea but many of them were so kindly. »
- Intressant att lyssna på de andra!»
- Although maybe it was impossible to do it all together with the rest of the class in a room. I thought that the presentations should be smaller and this could be the solution for this problem. I don"t agree that the supervisor don"t see the presentation.»
- Interesting»
- It was really nice especially with Jan"s comments »
- Good»
- Interesting. Nevertheless, I would have expect more comments on the report.»
- Good presentations and most of them interesting»
- ok, good with half class presentations.»
- I think the teacher, Jan Bröchner, took way too much time and space.»
- Good»
- Good, classic but good. »
- it was ok»
- The outlines of the presentations we"re good, it"s allways a good opportunity to improve your ability to get a message across verbally.»
- no coment»
- We had a bit of computer problems, but overall good.»
- It was ok. The evaluation from the other group was very useful. »
- good»
- Ok,»
- As always, there was a considerable amount of repetition from sucessive groups but this is unavoidable. Otherwise, seeing the work of other groups was beneficial»
- boring»

25. What is your opinion on the grading and feedback?

30 svarande

Good»12 40%
Neutral»15 50%
Bad»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- Snabbt betygsatta! BRA!» (Good)
- It is very good (and rare) to have such feedback on reports. So it is very good because in that way we can understand what goes wrong or right and improve our next reports.» (Good)
- The feedback as good. However it feels a bit odd to be able to see all the others feedback. I have not seen my exam yet but i guess the grading there is fair. » (Good)
- It is vital in any judgmental system that the items for assessment should be explained to the ones being judged. Which we did not get . » (Neutral)
- I expected more professional» (Neutral)
- The few lasts days study to the exam is the grade, what you have been doing during the whole semester seems not important.» (Bad)

Study climate

26. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»11 37%
Very good»13 44%
I did not seek help»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

27. How was the course workload?

30 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 26%
High»13 43%
Too high»9 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.03

- Adequate, but with the MOCI course together, it was a bit stressful. I would say: keep that way but warn the students at the beginning of the quarter!» (Adequate)
- Nevertheless, the focus was very much on the group assignment and sometimes you just want to study for yourself.» (Adequate)
- The project loaded many additional hours into the last weeks butthis seems unavoidable in a 7 week term» (Adequate)
- More time needed to read the literature» (High)
- But with an interesting subject, it does not matter.» (High)
- A bit high, but that´,s the way it is suppose to be. However together with the other course it could be a bit much sometimes. » (High)
- in combination with the workload in MOCI it was too high!» (High)
- MOCI and CCR has to be done in different quarters. The main idea is was slipt the teams in MOCI and CCR and the team participation was not entire for all the members » (Too high)
- Because maybe the Professor plan that the group work takes xhour to be developed, but it is normal that since we still are not that efficient and it take us twice time (2xhours). Maybe this is the reason why we didn"t have time to read everything. Put more time for the students to develop the Group work when you are planing the course again.» (Too high)
- You need to link the two courses togehter. As a student you do not have energy to do a good job with that high work load, you just trying to survive all task» (Too high)

28. How was the total workload this study period?

30 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 13%
High»7 23%
Too high»19 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- More time needed to read the literature» (High)
- See last comment» (High)
- It interfered in the end, otherwise it was good.» (High)
- Two relatively large groupworks with presentations, lectures and two exams, was pretty intense.» (High)
- I don"t understand the use of the final exam while we had to do a lot during the semester» (Too high)
- It"s impossible to have two reports and exams the same period.» (Too high)
- If it is possible please teach these two courses, CCR and MOCI, in separate quarter» (Too high)
- Somewhere between high and too high, some weeks was worse than other. But the last week with to handins two presentations and then re-load to the exam was quite hard, but i guess it worked out pretty good anyway, you can manage more than you think.» (Too high)
- As a student you do not have energy to do a good job with that high work load, you just trying to survive all task. Feel I could have learned a lot more if time was givn to study more instead of writing meaningless tasks» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

29. What is your general impression of the course?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»7 23%
Good»17 56%
Excellent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Jäkligt intressant ämne!» (Good)
- I would expect more knowledge on regulations and laws but the course was still good.» (Good)
- Very important and interesing subject, I would definitely like to learn more.» (Good)

30. What should definitely be preserved next year?

- The groupwork, negotiation and mannerheimer & swartling»
- Nathalie Bretz lecture. »
- the way of evaluating, Exam plus group work. »
- All the lectures»
- Guest lecture with different ideas in the same time»
- Project report presented in a form of conference paper is a good thing and the exercise concerning the conference paper is good as well.»
- The courses on Construction law, the lectures on general contract law, the Swartling lectures, the lectures on negotiation and a visit on site.»
- Almost everything»
- The Winch book »
- the negotiation part. »
- The lecture topics which I mentioned as very good and the possibility to meet with "Reality", i.e companies. »
- group work and cooperation with the companies for the group work»
- I think all the moments gave you something.»
- Anna and Jan»
- The lectures. »
- the guest lectures»
- swartling visite and groupwork.»
- Mannheimer Swartling and Kjell Arefjäll»
- The variation of lecturers and opinions from working professionals»
- work load, specially you should cut some lectures»

31. What should definitely be changed next year?

- The content of the hallandsridge visit»
- Load work»
- either final exam or group work should be in this course considering the fat of other heavy course student usually have at the same time.»
- since the group work takes us a lot of more time to develop, should be more important on the final grade, for example 50%.»
- The report should be removed or that the exam is removed»
- Winch book»
- Creat a better balance between the project and literature reading.»
- The lecture and reading material about "groups" could be changed - I thought it was to theoretical for this course. Would like to get more tips and advises of how to improve group work instead of investigate deeply individual behavior in groups etc. »
- the Hallandsås visit»
- the literature. »
- Try to limit the grup work work load since it is energy consuming when you are all at different levels. Anyhow, you learn something from it, as well. »
- more supervision/feedback on the group work. Either exam or group work, not both!»
- Perhaps put Jeannette in a language/presentation class :-)»
- the study trip to hallandsåsen. Maby find another project »
- Maybe the groupaasignment could be more in colaboration with the MOCI course?»
- supervision for project work»
- don´,t know»
- Jeanette Andersson (general contract law. She must be more focused on making it interesting for students.»
- literature»

32. Additional comments

- This course was outstanding, with regards to teaching, literature and preparation of projects. I wish all teachers were so enthusiastic and lively as Anna and Jan.»
- Taking lessons from other management schools could help some times. »
- I think the subject is important for all civil engineering students and should be studied during the first three years if possible. Then you also get rid of the issue of presenting swedish law to foreign students.»
- not much.. just keep on doing what you do:)»
- I know it was explained during the course why this was difficult, but additional textbook resources to view alongside Winch would be beneficial- perhaps Anna and Jan could write one?(!)»
- We are students in Construction Project Management! I think whole program should be aware of this! »

Kursutvärderingssystem från