Visa resultat

Heat and moisture engineering 2008, BOM080

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

42 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		18		42%
Around 20 hours/week»		12		28%
Around 25 hours/week»		8		19%
Around 30 hours/week»		3		7%
At least 35 hours/week»		1		2%

Genomsnitt: 1.97

- Inledningsvis har jag tänkte skriva på svenska för att spara tid eftersom jag har många åsikter om den här väldigt dåliga kursen. Den lågt lagda tiden är för att vi knappt fick någon ledning med vad vi skulle syssla med i inledningen. Och i slutet började man hoppa föreläsningarna då de var skitdåliga.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- There were not much to read in this course since we did not have any course book. Too few calculation tasks. » (At most 15 hours/week)
- Not much to read and very hard to find any assignment to work with.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The course teachers were weak at showing appropriate material to study and appropriate exercises to practice. Hence, I often found myself having trouble to know exactly what to do to prepare for the exam.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- Lots of revision from the recommended textbook "introduction to building physics", little of which seemed relevant in the exam.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

42 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		4		9%
50%»		10		23%
75%»		13		30%
100%»		15		35%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- All lectures on slides and not much extra in class.» (25%)
- I attended almost all the first 2-3 weeks. But the lectures were quite messy, it happened several times that different teachers hold the same lectures on different days.» (50%)
- It didnt seem useful for the course » (50%)
- not useful to attend lectures» (50%)
- Too many different teachers/professors and an impression of weak collaboration meant that many lectures had over-lapping content. Many lectures felt useless and repetitive. » (50%)
- The lectures were poorly prepared. Those 75% were a complete waste of time!» (75%)
- De resterande 25% ligger främst i de senare veckorna. » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

41 svarande

Small extent»		8		19%
Some extent»		17		41%
Large extent»		13		31%
Great extent»		3		7%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

- you can"t learn something from this cours as it is at this moment.» (Small extent)
- It was not possible to ask a question about the subject and get a somewhat adequate answer. » (Small extent)
- Do not know much more than before» (Some extent)
- But that´,s not thank´,s to this course unfortunately.» (Some extent)
- Om det är värme och luft i typ väggar dom menar. Vill tillägga att vi dock redan spenderat en hel kurs med detta innan, nämligen byggnadsfysik. Lärde mig det här målet 10 ggr bättre i den kursen.» (Large extent)
- Did know it since before the course» (Large extent)

4. To what extent did you reach the follwoing goal?

42 svarande

0-20%»		5		11%
20-40%»		6		14%
40-60%»		15		35%
60-80%»		12		28%
80-100%»		4		9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- you can"t learn something from this cours as it is at this moment.» (0-20%)
- Do not know much more than before» (20-40%)
- Förstår inte hur det här målet skiljer sig från det övre.» (60-80%)
- Did know it since before the course. This is almost same as last goal.» (60-80%)
- See comment above.» (60-80%)

5. To what extent did you reach the follwoing goal?

41 svarande

0-20%»		9		21%
20-40%»		8		19%
40-60%»		15		36%
60-80%»		8		19%
80-100%»		1		2%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- you can"t learn something from this cours as it is at this moment.» (0-20%)
- Ok dom snacka endel om kritiska fukthalter. Men dom har inte presenterat en enda jävla konkret kritisk fukthalt. Dom jag kan kommer från förra perioden.» (0-20%)
- Didnt learn anything about degradation, the exam didnt include degradiation.» (0-20%)
- Do not know much more than before» (0-20%)

6. To what extent did you reach the following goal?

42 svarande

0-20%»		7		16%
20-40%»		8		19%
40-60%»		15		35%
60-80%»		10		23%
80-100%»		2		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- you can"t learn something from this cour as it is at this moment.» (0-20%)
- I think the number of practical exercises were too few, and the project work was not that serious. » (0-20%)
- Do not know much more than before» (0-20%)
- Menar ni att dom försökt lära ut det!? (inte 0 % för att jag kunde lite om det innan)» (20-40%)
- I think this is almost same as goal 1 and 2 as well, and then i knew i t since before» (60-80%)
- See comment above.» (60-80%)

7. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

- you can"t learn something from this cour as it is at this moment. But I have some previous knowledge and hopefully i will survive on that. I have"nt learnt something new in this cours and the things that where new was not taught well enough.»
- I don"t have any problem to disguss with nor experts or public.»
- To some extent.»
- All in all, I think this course was not useful in this goal since the quality of the lectures was not satisfactory.»
- small extent»
- Very well, we did this in the project work.»
- Om det är möjligt att diskutera med experter inom det här området efter den här kursen så är hela området ett skämt..»
- I don"t think I have reached this goal.»
- Good.»
- Some, simulation tools gives a quick estimation»
- I dont think we practised this.»
- Not much»
- 40-60%»
- small »
- 40-60%»
- Large»
- 60-80%»
- In some extent, but the main part of that knowledge comes from other courses.»

8. How understandable are the course goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		10		23%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		23		54%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		9		21%

Genomsnitt: 1.97

- There was a lack of some lectures to relate structural engineering and this course. We had only one lecture about this relationship, it was very hard to understand what is the effect of heat and moisture on the mechanical behavior of structure? and what is the benefit of this course to a structural engineer?» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- Do the persons responsible for the course comprehend the goals?» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- The goals tells the same thing over and over again in different words. Most of the goals the swedish students knows from previous courses. » (The goals are difficult to understand)
- There was no guidance as to which topics would be examined and which were not related at all to the exam. I spent ALOT of time revising for this subject and it did not help in the slightest. Guidance is required to set students on the right track, and past papers/exam style questions which are true to the final exam are needed.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- The goals doesn´,t fit the course since a great part of the course was repetition, with different lecturers talking about the same things. The parts I was hoping to see more of, time-dependense, was only dealt with in a small extent.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- but I have"nt reached them!» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- Men man lär sig inte målen i kursen..» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

9. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

38 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		9		23%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		26		68%
No, the goals are set too high»		3		7%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

- I, as an international student, did not have the similar course in my bachelor degree, and sometimes the teachers and the information were too vague for me. For example, we had only one lecture about advanced heat transfer without any example and clarification, then we had a hard question of this case in exam. The information was mainly repetition boring for swedish students, while, they were vague for some international students. » (No, the goals are set too low)
- Jag tror medelbetyget kommer vara relativt lågt på den här tentan. Men detta beror på en dåligt gjord tenta och främst fruktansvärt dåliga lärare och föreläsningar. Jag förstår inte varför svenska studenter ska behöva läsa den här kursen. Jag har INTE LÄRT MIG NÅGONTING NYTT!» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Instead: set as goal to learn how to model 2-dimensional heat flow, i.e.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- It´,s the worst course i have ever done.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- but the cours have wrong focus! » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- I myself had know background of this course and it was very difficult to get prepared enough for the exam considering heavy work in the other course(FEM basics)» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

10. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		7		17%
To some extent»		22		53%
Yes, definitely»		11		26%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		1		2%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- There was an apparent lack of time in the exam, and it was not an assessment of our qualities but our speed. Some tasks, specially the heat problem, was tough in the course but not exercised.» (No, not at all)
- Compare the course summary on the hand-outs to the exam, and see for yourselves.» (No, not at all)
- Det kändes som de här fem olika lärarna vi har haft alla tog var sitt tal utan att fundera på hur lång tid det faktiskt skulle ta att räkna hela tentan. Att ha en tenta med främst beräkningar i en kurs utan räkneövningar (eller räknehänvisningar bortsett från sista veckan) är också rätt komiskt.» (No, not at all)
- Tentan hade inget upplägg, omöjligt att hinna med den i tid. Förmodligen hade inte de som gjort den pratat med varandra.» (No, not at all)
- I think I passed the exam, but have not really understood what this course was about.» (To some extent)
- If you knew exactly how to do on all questions on the exam I dont think you would manage to finish it within 4 hours.» (To some extent)
- You can not have calculation tasks that tou have not had any exercise in!» (To some extent)
- The exam time was too short.I think answering such questions needed some more time.If I had more time I could answer at least 2 more parts and complete the other answers.» (To some extent)
- And probably did"nt no one reached the goals becaus no one had left the examination hall after 3h 55min. We are probably very stupid all of us! » (Yes, definitely)
- There was a lack of time during the examination. Even if you were able to answer all questions you did not have enough time to answer them.» (Yes, definitely)
- I think it will be better if there are several small dogas during the lecture. » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

11. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		22		52%
Some extent»		14		33%
Large extent»		4		9%
Great extent»		2		4%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- The cours started with some repetition and after that some summerising of the repetition!» (Small extent)
- All lectures on slides and not much extra in class.» (Small extent)
- The tragical part of the course was some lectures. There were some lectures that the teacher could not answer the questions, and he was not prepared at all. Specially, there were some mistakes in some lectures which eliminated afterward in the homepage, but they did confuse the students. There was an exercise which has been solved in a wrong way in the lecture, and it eliminated only 2 days before exam, while, the exercise was very similar to one of the tasks in the exam. Most of lectures have been prepared by Anders, but presented by other teachers,while, they were not familiar with them. Some of the exercises were prepared by person and presented by another person who could not answer the students" questions.» (Small extent)
- It seams that the teachers always comes unprepared. Espacially Ingemar Segerholm. His lectures didnt give anything at all. Because of the amount of teachers, slides in the powerpoints often where re-used.» (Small extent)
- There is no reason to put lectures in the scedule, when there is nothing to lecture on. If the teacher has not done the lecture-slides him/her-self (!!!), the least he/she could do is to prepare the presentation.» (Small extent)
- För det första så borde Anders Lindvall som var ansvarig för den här kursen ALDRIG få ett sådant ansvar igen. Jag har aldrig träffat en lärare som visat så lite engagemang för sin kurs tidigare. Exempel: När vi redovisade våra projektarbeten så satt han i salen, längst fram så man såg honom när man redovisa, och läste något helt annant istället för att lyssna. När de andra lärarna fråga honom vad han tyckte svara han med ett kort "Jag håller med". Jag hoppas att ansvaret på den här kursen läggs på någon annan till nästa år. För det andra, Ingemar Segerholm. Jag vet inte om det är dåligt självförtroende som gör honom till en så dålig föreläsare, men något är det. En föreläsare som honom gör att jag faktiskt ser lägre på Chalmers som teknisk högskola. Det första han skulle kunna göra är att skriva sina egna jävla powerpoints! Istället för att komma med en powerpoint skriven av Lindvall, inleda med "det här är inte mitt område", och sen bara läsa rakt av. Hans föreläsningar (som var rätt många) var ett slöseri med allas tid. Och jag tror han märkte av det i slutet av perioden. Avslutningsvis så var strukturen på kursen jättedålig. Alla lärarna snackade om olika saker som var svåra att se en röd tråd i. När två lärare väl snackade om samma område hade de inte snackat med varandra och undervisade samma sak med samma grafer!» (Small extent)
- A bit messy. Plus a lot of the times it seems like the teacher sees the presentation for the first time as well. So it"s mostly somebody reading the slides, and just to have them read I prefer to do that on my own at home.» (Small extent)
- They had vacation during the time all students studied for the exam and had questions.» (Small extent)
- I am deeply disappointed.» (Small extent)
- sorry but its true» (Small extent)
- Lektionerna har endast lett till större förvirring och de saknar helt samanhang.» (Small extent)
- The lecturers should be more prepared before the lecture. Presentations should be done by the person giving the lecture. The "red thread" get lost when someone else gives the lectue.» (Some extent)

12. To what extent have the guest lectures been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		28		68%
Some extent»		10		24%
Large extent»		1		2%
Great extent»		2		4%

Genomsnitt: 1.43

- All lectures on slides and not much extra in class.» (Small extent)
- » (Small extent)
- Vill inte vara elak mot den tjejen som kom och snacka för hon har ju ändå tagit sig tid men..» (Small extent)
- Nothing concerning this on the examination, the guest lectures where to wide. Could be more narrow in subject and have more relevant content. It"s always interesting to hear about mould and fungi, but it would be good to have some connection with the ordinary lectures.» (Small extent)
- Couldnt really distinguish between guest lectures and lectures when we had like 5 different teachers during one week, all going throw the same thing again.» (Small extent)
- Don"t even remember them» (Small extent)
- quite good guest lectures, but there were no following up on exercise or exam... so the students who used that time for other work used the time better for passing the exam...» (Small extent)
- Orelevanta.» (Small extent)
- If you look at the goals but not at all if you check the EXAM!» (Great extent)

13. To what extent have the exercises been of help for your learing?

Small extent»		16		38%
Some extent»		7		16%
Large extent»		15		35%
Great extent»		4		9%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- the most complicated cases that we was suposed to learn was to few.» (Small extent)
- It seams that the teachers always comes unprepared. Espacially Ingemar Segerholm. His lectures didnt give anything at all.» (Small extent)
- The teachers were"nt even prepared!» (Small extent)
- Exercises? :)» (Small extent)
- Would have been of better help to get the answers and study it yourself, but they couldnt give it out because they didnt had time to translate the solutions to english. Maybe not that good prepared!» (Small extent)
- One of the problems with this course has been the lack of exercises. In order to fully understand something exercises are crusual, where students get the opportunity to discuss and calculate problems under the supervision of teachers. This course hasn´,t used that kind of tutoring at all.» (Small extent)
- very few exercises, and only at the end of the course...» (Small extent)
- Exempel som alltid innehåller något fel, i uppgift eller lösning är värdelösa.» (Small extent)
- We could have done more exercises though. And maybe they could have been done a bit clearer. » (Large extent)
- No examples of solutions, so this was the only chance to find out how to solve the exercises. Good with more examples with solutions and example of examination.» (Large extent)
- Since we didnt get any old exames to study on the exercises was all I had...» (Large extent)
- except the last one.. That was not very helpful» (Large extent)
- Since there where not so many tasks with correct solutions, we could only learn from the exercise.» (Great extent)

14. To what extent have the laborations (pratical and computer work) been ov help for your learing?

Small extent»		17		41%
Some extent»		16		39%
Large extent»		7		17%
Great extent»		1		2%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- No use at all did alredy know that part, waste of time!» (?)
- Same laboraton as in Byggnadsmaterial during second year. Waste of time and money!!!!!!!!!!» (Small extent)
- Kopptestet! Kom igen, var det meningen att vi inte skulle lära oss något nytt lr!?» (Small extent)
- More basic than the lectures. The laborations were done in year 2.» (Small extent)
- Useless laboration since we have already done it in the course Building Physics!» (Small extent)
- Troligen den sämsta och lamaste övniungen jag deltagit i. Oengagerade övningsledare och löjligt att inte använda riktig programvara.» (Small extent)
- Not the measuring tools part though» (Large extent)

15. To what extent has the project been of help for your learing?

Small extent»		17		40%
Some extent»		15		35%
Large extent»		8		19%
Great extent»		2		4%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- No clear demands on what we are supposed to come up with! Have a look at the fem cours and you could learn something!» (Small extent)
- The project was not serious at all, we did only some obvious tasks and then presented them. Most of the part of the project was related to computer software and it could not help us to realize what we do. » (Small extent)
- I dont think the task was well thought out.» (Small extent)
- Something has to be done about this part of the course.» (Small extent)
- Mest intressant på föreläsningen så lyssnade inte lindvall ens på de som presenterade, dags att sluta kanske?» (Small extent)
- Det hjälpte mig inte uppfylla något av ovanstående mål men det var i alla fall något nytt. (Ävan om jag anser att ha ett beräkningsprogram i excel är ett skämt)» (Some extent)
- Needs more depth in the project. A more explicite task.» (Some extent)
- Poorly coordinated though» (Large extent)

16. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		18		42%
Some extent»		15		35%
Large extent»		7		16%
Great extent»		2		4%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- Was there any course litterature?» (Small extent)
- The course book was not useful since most of the material was too scattered in that. most subjects of this course were included in different parts of this book, and the book was upper than the course"s level. In other words, it was not easy follow the book if we had a problem in a subject.» (Small extent)
- Poorly (into english) translated material.» (Small extent)
- Ingen alls faktiskt.. De sidor jag kollat på gick vi igenom på byggnadsfyisken.» (Small extent)
- Finns ingen kurslitteratur.» (Small extent)
- Would be good with a couse book/compendium or similar to study on your own.» (Some extent)
- The Hagentoft book was not so ok for learning» (Some extent)
- many different pdf files, with no logic idex... many figures are repeated and used by different lectures, hard to use the files in study..» (Some extent)

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		16		39%
Rather badly»		7		17%
Rather well»		14		34%
Very well»		4		9%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Information often comes very late, and the structure of all the 2000 powerpoint-slides is impossible to get a grip of.» (Very badly)
- have a look at the old one there you can find solutions that the examinatior was"nt able to hand out!» (Very badly)
- They presented times for laborations one day before these were supposed to take place. And that was a compulsory exersice!» (Very badly)
- Abiguous information about the projects. Important information regarding the exam changed during course. There was no obvious person in charge of the course. However he did a very poor job. » (Very badly)
- Very late information, for instance the information about the presentation of the project work. It was so late, that we did not have time to change our presentation (powerpoint etc) according to the information.» (Very badly)
- Information of laboration was posted in a folder on the homepage. Who is looking there everyday?» (Very badly)
- To distribute hundreds of power point slides on the course home page is not a good way to go.» (Very badly)
- Saknar upplägg, svårt att hitta material.» (Very badly)
- Because of many numbers of teachers sometimes it was misunderstanding there. For example it was supposed to publish the laboratory material on a date but this job was not done on time. » (Rather badly)
- It seams that the different teachers dosent communicate so much with each other. Unclear who to hand in to. » (Rather badly)
- Det känns som jag bara klagar.. Men vi hade ett obligatoriskt labbtillfälle då endast hälften av klassen dök upp på grund av dålig information. Dellming påstod när en kompis var uppe och snacka med honom att han lagt ut FLERA noteringar på hemsida. Vi hitta en och den angav inge tider..» (Rather badly)
- For instance obviuos diffuseness concerning laboratory times...» (Rather badly)
- Too much of stuff we did not need. Try to focus the stuff better.» (Rather well)
- All lectures available on the homepage» (Rather well)

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		6		14%
Rather poor»		11		26%
Rather good»		14		33%
Very good»		8		19%
I did not seek help»		3		7%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Anders Lindwall never want to answer a question when he is at his office. During the most important period, close to the exam, he took a vacation. » (Very poor)
- They had vacation when we needed help. The examinator didnt have time for questions when som students came to his office and asked him.» (Very poor)
- There was almost never time for questions. » (Rather poor)
- I myself tried some times to ask question from one of the teacher and he could not answer me most of the time since he was not prepared.» (Rather poor)
- Finns inte så mycket att söka hjälp om när kursen saknar innehåll.» (Rather poor)
- Always someone available.» (Very good)
- Men jag hörde att några var uppe för att få hjälp när det var hjälptid utsatt på schemat, ingen var där..» (I did not seek help)

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		2%
Rather poorly»		4		9%
Rather well»		21		50%
Very well»		16		38%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- The foreign students didnt want to do much in the project work while they didnt have the structural system course from previous period.» (Rather poorly)
- Fortfarande fel att para ihop studenter i grupper som har olika ambitions nivåer.» (Rather well)

20. How was the course workload?

Too low»		3		7%
Low»		11		26%
Adequate»		20		48%
High»		5		12%
Too high»		2		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Gjorde väldigt lite och fick väldigt många poäng på tetan.» (Too low)
- No student knew what to study during the period.» (Low)
- Too much at the end though. Could have been distributed better.» (Adequate)
- Hard to say actually. There has only been thing we had to do just for the sake of it, nothing really to do with learning.» (Adequate)
- The work load was ok but the exam was not fair for students.I knew the answers but there was not enough time at all.» (Adequate)
- It was too high but with lower quality.. Very time consuming but with low results in learning in some parts of the course.» (Too high)

21. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		2%
Adequate»		21		50%
High»		14		33%
Too high»		6		14%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

- I was familiar with both courses since before. » (Adequate)
- We had a serioue cours to! (FEM)» (High)
- Very high workload in the end of the period.» (High)
- FEM kursen är helt underbra. Görnog allt rätt.» (High)
- the workload of FEM basics was really high» (Too high)

22. To what extent were there connections between the two courses ("Heat and moisture engineering" and "Finite element method - basics") in this study period?

Very small extent»		7		17%
Rather small extent»		17		42%
Rather high extent»		14		35%
Very high extent»		2		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- I didn"t take the course FEM-basics» (?)
- -» (?)
- The project only tested our FEM knowledge. Although it gave 2 points for the HAM-exam. » (Very small extent)
- Allt vi behövde för att utföra den gemensamma uppgiften lärde vi oss i FEM kursen.» (Very small extent)
- bad organisation from the heat and moisture course made it very messy and i feel that it would be better for FEM basics if there was no coorporation between the courses» (Very small extent)
- Did not take FEM.» (Very small extent)
- The second FEM-project didn"t really involve any content from the heat and moisture course. The main task of the project was programming the FEM-application, which doesn"t involve knowledge of heat or moisture at all.» (Rather small extent)
- It"s small since we didn"t talk a lot about heat in Heat and Moisture. But it was good reading FEM at the same time so we got that covered as well.» (Rather small extent)
- Did not study FEM.» (Rather small extent)
- The H&M course gave indata to one of the FEM projects. » (Rather small extent)
- The FEM-HAME-project merged the two courses well, even though it was poorly coordinated and clearified.» (Rather high extent)

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		25		59%
Fair»		7		16%
Adequate»		6		14%
Good»		4		9%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.73

- remove this cours! or by it from some experts!» (Poor)
- I think about 80% of the course was repetition from earlier courses. I don"t think this course should be compulsory, It might be good for students from other countries to read it, but Swedish students already have this knowledge....» (Poor)
- As I can remember, the worst course ever. It seams like nothing was new to lears, the teachers didnt like the course eather and was not helpful. And we didnt got solved solutions to old exams because of lack of time and they said it would be to easy if whe have the solutions. Isnt the goal to learn us??!!» (Poor)
- I think it"s to many people involved and no comunication between them. Because they show up at lesson and don"t seem aware of what we have done until now.» (Poor)
- Definitly the worst course i have read during my 3,5 years here. I cant believe this course is mandatory. I get the impression that the examinator doesnt relly care about the course and would rather not have the course at all. » (Poor)
- Skip the course to next year» (Poor)
- One of the worst courses I"ve taken during my studies at Chalmers.» (Poor)
- Skit kurs med dåliga föreläsare och ycket dålig examinator. Skäms för att någon utbytesstudent ska behöva se e så dålig kurs på chalmers.» (Poor)
- Better information had done this course much better. The coordinator of the course did not take his full responsibility.» (Fair)
- Not much new knowledge. Gives some more understanding of the mechanisms of heat and moisture transfer.» (Fair)
- A lot of repetition for us from sweden» (Fair)
- See above» (Adequate)
- interesting course, but i focused on FE, to pass that one» (Good)

24. What is the remaing value of the course in the future?

Very small»		18		42%
Rather small»		9		21%
Rahter high»		15		35%
Very high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- Becaus I didn"t learn somthing new! » (Very small)
- Non-existing. » (Very small)
- I have choosen structural engeneering» (Very small)
- As a swedish student I don´,t unuderstand why I have to read building physics im my earlier years, if it´,s enough for the exchange student´,s to start with a repetition in this course and then quickly move on from there. If thats the case there should be no problem to shut down one of these courses.» (Very small)
- Kommer inte ta med denna kurs i min examen, om jag så skulle behöva ta ut en allmänexamen. » (Very small)
- I"m not sure about the application of it in my future career because this is a rather new topic for me.» (Rather small)
- The 20% that was new info was very important, I think 2 weeks is more than enough to learn that part.» (Rahter high)
- Not my field but the course containged stuff important for me to know.» (Rahter high)
- is it posible to seperate the course to heat for students who want to study building performence and moisture for structural engineering.» (Rahter high)

25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

26. What should definitely be changed to next year?

27. Additional comments