Visa resultat

Combustion engineering, men031

1. How many hours peer week did you spend on this course?

At most 15 hours»		1		6%
About 20 hours»		7		43%
About 25 hours»		5		31%
At least 30 hours»		3		18%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

Your own effort and qualifications

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		6%
50%»		1		6%
75%»		4		25%
100%»		10		62%

Genomsnitt: 4.43

- Inte alltid närvarande på hjälplektionerna för inlämningsuppgifterna då de var klara före lektionerna. » (100%)

3. Do you consider that you hade sufficient knowledge to read this course?

Yes, absolutely»		13		81%
In part, but I struggled in places»		3		18%
No»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.18

- Chemistry background with advanced courses in reaction engineering and thermodynamics.» (Yes, absolutely)
- But that is how it should be. It should push your knowledge to the edge and then teach you more.» (In part, but I struggled in places)

Goals and goal fulfilment

4. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the course goals»		2		12%
The goals are difficult to understand»		3		18%
The goals give some guidance, but could be more clear»		3		18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to»		8		50%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasnoable»		14		93%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		6%
To some extent»		6		40%
Yes, definitely»		8		53%
I don"t know, I have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- It could be good to have 5 hours for the exam since the theory demands some time and the calculations are always timeconsuming if you don"t see the solution right away. Stress shall not determine the grade!» (Yes, definitely)

teaching methods

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

small extent»		2		12%
some extent»		3		18%
large extent»		11		68%
great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- the exercise lectures were helpful» (small extent)
- I liked especially the demonstrations on combustion in the first week, they were quite helpful for understanding.» (large extent)
- Bra med räkneövningar» (large extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature been of help for your learning?

small extent»		0		0%
some extent»		4		25%
large extent»		8		50%
great extent»		4		25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Hard to follow the book. Would be better to have a general text book which goes deeper into the theory.» (some extent)
- Many mistakes in the book regarding notation in formulas and so on..» (large extent)
- The book is good but it contains a lot of errors and some improvments could be made to make the appendix easier to understand.» (large extent)
- Det hade dock varit jättebra med en innehållsförteckning till boken. Jag förstår att det är mycket jobb, men oavsett om den inte är så detaljerad hade det varit till mycket hjälp.» (large extent)
- Hela kursen finns i boken och det är lätt att följa med.» (great extent)

9. Did you find powerpoint presentations to be helpful?

small extent»		2		12%
some extent»		10		62%
large extent»		4		25%
great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- Would have been better if it was possible to print the powerpoint presentations in advance so that you could take notes.» (some extent)
- In some lectures, the classic power point abuse appeared, too many slides with too much information. In the "old days" when the blackboard and overhead were used, the lectures were more focusing on the most important parts.» (some extent)

10. What was your overall impression of the lectures?

Excellent»		1		6%
Good»		10		62%
Moderate»		3		18%
Poor»		2		12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- better english would be appreciated. Some guest lectuers had only swedish power points.» (Moderate)

11. What was your overall impression of assignments 1-5?

Excellent»		3		18%
Good»		12		75%
Moderate»		1		6%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- Put a lot of effort into doing these assignments.» (Excellent)
- Very good assignments, but different levels of the teachers. » (Good)
- Vissa var tidskrävande men samtidigt lärorika så det var bra. Kan vara bra med mer frågor relaterade till uppgifterna.» (Good)

12. What was your overall impression of assignment 6?

Very interesting»		5		31%
Fairly interesting»		11		68%
Not interesting»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.68

- unfortunately the FB concept got a bit to short attention/ time in the lecture on boilers. Maybe the boiler lecture needs more time» (Very interesting)
- Kändes som en heltäckande uppgift, mycket tidskrävande men samtidigt intressant. » (Very interesting)
- took too much time from studying for the exam. should lie earlier if possible.» (Fairly interesting)
- The final hand in was to late. Struggling in handing the assignment in when the effort should for the exam as this assignment did not contribute in the understanding the theory to pass the exam. » (Fairly interesting)
- The extra task is perhaps given too much focus.» (Fairly interesting)

13. How well did the course administration and homepage work?

Excellent»		8		50%
Good»		6		37%
Moderate»		1		6%
Poor»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 1.68

Teaching staff and guest lecturers

14. Please rate lectures by Henrik Thunman

Excellent»		3		18%
Good»		9		56%
Moderate»		2		12%
Poor»		2		12%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

15. Please rate lecture by Martin Seemans

Excellent»		1		7%
Good»		7		50%
Moderate»		3		21%
Poor»		3		21%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Not structured, very hard to follow.» (Poor)

16. Please, rate the guest lecture by Lars Strömberg

Excellent»		7		50%
Good»		6		42%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		1		7%

Genomsnitt: 1.64

- missed it» (?)
- very interesting» (Excellent)

17. Please, rate the guest lecture by Bo Leckner

Excellent»		1		7%
Good»		10		71%
Moderate»		1		7%
Poor»		2		14%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

18. Please, rate the guest lecture by Sven Andersson

Excellent»		5		33%
Good»		9		60%
Moderate»		1		6%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.73

19. Please, rate the guest lecture by Anders Lyngfelt

Excellent»		1		7%
Good»		5		35%
Moderate»		8		57%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

20. Please, rate the guest lecture by Lars-Erik Eriksson

Excellent»		0		0%
Good»		9		64%
Moderate»		5		35%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

21. Please, rate the guest lecture by Åsa burman

Excellent»		0		0%
Good»		0		0%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 0

22. Please, rate the guest lecture Margareta Lundberg

Excellent»		0		0%
Good»		0		0%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 0

23. Please, rate the assignment leader Sadegh Seddighi Khavidak

Excellent»		5		31%
Good»		10		62%
Moderate»		1		6%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

24. Please, rate the assignment leader Fredrik Lind

Excellent»		5		31%
Good»		9		56%
Moderate»		1		6%
Poor»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- It would have been better to just get the solutions on a paper than to attend Fredriks lectures» (Poor)

25. Please, rate the assignment leader Martin Seemann

Excellent»		1		6%
Good»		11		68%
Moderate»		4		25%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- Was quite difficult to get a hold of when you needed help.» (Good)

Study climate

26. What did you think about the work load for the assignments?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		5		33%
High»		9		60%
Too high»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Some of them took a lot of time and the part that took time wasn"t understanding any combustion but working with matlab and such.» (High)
- but not necessarily too high...» (High)

27. What did you think about the overall work load in the course?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		5		31%
High»		11		68%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

28. How was the work load this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		2		12%
Adequate»		5		31%
High»		7		43%
Too High»		2		12%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

29. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		4		25%
Very Good»		12		75%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Det var dock väldigt svårt att få tag på någon lärare eller övningsledare sista dagarna innan tentan, då man äntligen satt sig in i kursen ordentligt och hade frågor vars svar inte gick att finna i boken. Till nästa år kanske ni kan informera om vem som ska vara på plats vilken tid (kanske ha någon speciell konsultationstid de sista dagarna) så att man slipper springa till E-huset flera gånger om dagen utan att hitta någon att fråga.» (Rather good)

30. How well has the cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		1		6%
Rather good»		4		25%
Very good»		11		68%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Summarizing questions

31. What is your overall impression of the course?

Poor»		1		6%
Fair»		0		0%
Good»		11		68%
Excellent»		4		25%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- The course focused on computations in the assignments and then the exam was focused on theory. Not understanding the theory but memorizing the whole book. Doing the assignments did nothing too make you ready for the exam. You would gain more by copying the assignments and focusing on memorizing the book to pass this course. » (Poor)
- Interesting topics are brought up. The first day we saw some demonstrations which was very interesting. The exam contains a lot of theory questions and therefore I think it would be good if the assignments contained more theory questions. Maybe it is possible to replace one assignment with some laboratory work where the students made a lab and than performed calculations on the lab results. » (Excellent)

32. What improvements can be made to next year?

33. What should definitely be preserved to next year?