Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computational nonlinear mechanics, TME155

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-19 - 2009-01-20
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 72%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Ekh»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Own effort

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

Estimate the total time in, including both teaching activities and your own studies. Try to estimate the average for the whole study period.

13 svarande

At most 10 hours»0 0%
About 15 hours»2 15%
About 20 hours»3 23%
About 25 hours»5 38%
About 30 hours»1 7%
At least 35 hours»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

2. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»9 69%
High»3 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- High and adequate.» (High)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 23%
100%»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.76

4. How much time did you spend on this course, as compared to your parallell course?

13 svarande

Much less»0 0%
Less Similar»2 15%
More»2 15%
Much more»7 53%
I only had this course»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

- The contents of this course were much much bigger than in Vibration Control.» (Much more)
- didnt spend much time in the other course» (Much more)

Goals and goal fulfilment

5. How understandable and reasonable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 46%
Yes, definitely»7 53%
I don"t know/have not done the exam yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- The question about the shape functions was something i did not expect. Didn"t think that was one of the main things to learn in the course.» (To some extent)
- Never thought I would think this this about an exam but maybe it was a bit too easy?» (To some extent)

8. How much did computer assignment 1 help you to reach the goals?

13 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 23%
To large extent»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

9. How much did computer assignment 2 help you to reach the goals?

13 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 15%
To large extent»11 84%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

10. How much did computer assignment 3 help you to reach the goals?

13 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 7%
To large extent»12 92%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

teaching and course administration

11. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I concentrated on the book for learning the course material.» (Some extent)

12. To what extent has the Bonet & Wood book been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Good book!» (Large extent)
- Fantastic book, couldn"t be more informative and instructive.» (Great extent)

13. How well do you think that the lectures and the contents of the book fit together?

13 svarande

Very little»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
To large extent»7 53%
Almost completely»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 38%
Very well»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Part c of Assignment 3 never appeared on the web, I think? Otherwise good. The incredibly fast correcting of the exam was much appreciated!» (Rather well)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during class?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»10 76%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help between the classes?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 7%
Very good»10 76%
I did not seek help»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

17. How was the atmosphere between students and teachers during the lectures?

13 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

respectful»7 53%
friendly»13 100%
helpful»10 76%
open-minded»8 61%

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»3 23%
Excellent»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

- This course feels more like a course for the PhD students than for us how are about to get out in the industry in a short while.» (Adequate)
- Swantje and Magnus are nice people and had created a very interesting course. After studying the course, I am now much more interested in the science of material mechanics than before.» (Excellent)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The book was very good. That Magnus was in the computer room during the Lab time for assignment was very helpful and should be preserved.»
- The assignments»
- The book! It was brilliant. The plasticity compendium was also good. The questions on the learning outcomes were a really good way to learn the course contents.»
- The learning outcomes helped a lot.»
- Computer Assignments were of great help in learning how and where we we can use what we learned in the course.»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing»
- Using overheads to give the lectures can somtimes be of great help to clarify something but not for giving the whole lecture. I personally had most of the times problems with taking notes. »

22. Additional comments

- Probably the best course at my time at chalmers.»
- Top 3 courses on the master program. Interesting and good teatchers. Thank you!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från