Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Marine transport and economics, mma126
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2007-10-24 - 2007-11-24 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55% Kontaktperson: Carl Sjöberger»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 60% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.6 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 40% |
100%» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 4.6
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 20% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 60% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.4 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 25% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 3 | | 75% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.75 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 25% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 - It"s focusing on shipping in an economic point"s of view, whick sometimes feels very irrelevant» (Small extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 80% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - well we all know the problems with the homepage» (Rather badly)
9. Name one (or more) guest teacher(s) you can recommend for the next year course.- All of them! »
- Ronny Hanzèn, Ole Pradsgaard, Kenth Lumsden»
- all of the guest teachers that where present this year were good and said relevant things. You should keep them.»
10. Name one (or more) guest teacher(s) you not can recommend for the next year course.- -»
Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 80% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 60% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 40% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 13. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 60% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4 14. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 80% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8
Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
Good» | | 3 | | 60% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Basic shipping game, perhaps extend the project»
- guest teachers and study tours»
- the assignment was very interesting and should be preserved to next year.»
17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Advance the start of shipping game»
- Start the game earlier.»
- take one lecture in the beginning and see to that all students have a minimal knowledge about terminology and common things in shipping. In that way time will not be wasted 3-4 weeks into the course explaining things like lolo or bale/grain. »
- it would be better if courses in class and courses in the book were more linked. Sometimes, we read some informations in the book but there are no courses in classe corresponding to these.»
18. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|