Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Materials Characterisation and Failure Analysis, MMK081

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-16 - 2007-11-05
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 95%
Kontaktperson: Johan Ahlström»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 14%
Around 20 hours/week»7 33%
Around 25 hours/week»5 23%
Around 30 hours/week»3 14%
At least 35 hours/week»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Casseur i Chalmersspexet Bob som tar mycket tid just nu så har inte hunnit lägga så mycket tid i skolan som behövts och jag velat.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»3 14%
75%»6 28%
100%»11 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- Casseur i Chalmersspexet Bob som tar mycket tid just nu så har inte hunnit lägga så mycket tid i skolan som behövts och jag velat.» (25%)
- Missed first week and week 5 and 6 because of travel. » (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»16 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»2 9%
To some extent»7 33%
Yes, definitely»4 19%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Vet ej resultatet på tentan ännu.» (To some extent)
- but some question was too specific» (Yes, definitely)
- The plan was to do the main part of the studies during the last week before the exam, but then I got sick and was forced to stay in bed on the exam day. » (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 33%
Large extent»10 47%
Great extent»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The lectures gave guidence about litterature. Easier to know what to read» (Some extent)
- Har inte varit närvarande så ofta som jag velat.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 40%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- väldigt dåligt med e-böcker som litteratur, då man inte får reda på exakt vilka kapitel som ingår i alla fall. » (Some extent)
- Availbility of ASM Handbooks are great resource» (Great extent)
- The online resources were good but sometimes hard to sort out the more important parts from the less important ones. » (Great extent)
- To much information in ASM. Needs to specified.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 38%
Very well»13 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Would be better to obtain the lecture slides before the lecture, work ~50% of the time» (Rather well)
- viktigt att all info kommer ut och att inte vissa mailas och inte läggs ut. viktigt att allt finns på samma ställe.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 19%
Very good»13 61%
I did not seek help»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Lecturers always happy to pause to help clear topics» (Very good)
- When I needed help I knew where to go and I always felt welcome. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»11 52%
Very well»10 47%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- It seems like some students don"t know how to function in a group project» (Rather well)
- It worked ok with most of the group but there were some difficulties with certain people during the project work and I will not be working in the same group again!» (Rather well)
- svårt att få ihop tiden då jag har haft så mycket annat som krockat.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»14 66%
High»5 23%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»9 45%
High»7 35%
Too high»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Since I have all my credits already I only took this course» (?)
- I currently do three modules» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»17 80%
Excellent»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- Very fast paced but knowledgable» (Excellent)
- very interesting course. Very well planned. Good teachers. I´,m very pleased with this course!!!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- visiting Volvo power train and the labs»
- The SEM labb»
- Content and structure»
- Everything worked fine»
- the lecture style is very good.»
- The Volvo visit.»
- Handsout are gooD,and going to companys like volvo is good.»
- the lab »
- The visit to Volvo. It gives a good insight of how different failure analysis techniques are used in the industry.»
- good arrangement and communication with the teacher»
- all! I think that´,s an interesting course»
- Laboration parts»
- everything»
- Visit to Volvo. Laborations»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- that the course material won"t be online »
- The mini projects»
- Nothing in particular»
- i think the lab session should be modified. it is not very clearly structured. a lot of the info is missing during the lab session but made available after the lab, which is not very efficient in learning.»
- Tensile testing lab.»
- all thinks are good,but printed handsout must be somewhat larger.»
- nothing»
- The link arm lab is a good exercise, but it would be more helpful if information about the exact locations where the specimens were sectioned from are available.»
- better arrangements for lab causes»
- hardness testing. I think that´,s useless in the course»
- "Defenitely" is a strong word, but I did not get out much from the external speaker talking about NDT in Swedish nuclear industry. The slides were no good either in my opinion, it felt like the "real" audience for that presentation was not students.»
- A better explaination about EDX and SEM. Especially EDX»
- Lecture on NDT. The lecture is was not aimed for us I think. No relevant information.»

16. Additional comments

- The way the lectures were scheduled was excellent. Good to have all lectures done 2 weeks before the exams.»
- If I remember rightly, There was 1 or 2 Questions in EDX section,that I totally dadn"t heard or recieved any explanation about that in any of the lectures. I asked other students and the term or experession which was mentioned in the question was unfamiliar for them.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från