ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Materials for Light Weight Design 2008, MTT025

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-18 - 2009-02-01
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 63%
Kontaktperson: Mats Norell»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own work

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

Estimate the total time in, including both teaching activities and your own studies. Try to estimate the average for the whole study period.

6 svarande

At most 10 hours» 0 0%

About 15 hours» 1 16%

About 20 hours» 3 50%

About 25 hours» 1 16%

About 30 hours» 1 16%

At least 35 hours» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

2. How large percentage of the lectures did you attend?

6 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 16%

75%» 2 33%

100%» 3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Learning outcome

The course syllabus states the the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e. the knowledge, proficiencies and I attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable and reasonable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 28%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 2 28%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 3 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 4 80%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- It quite hard to take polymers, metals and composites together, it"s a bit too much.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess wheather you have reached the course goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 4 80%

Yes, definitely» 1 20%

I do not know/have not been examined yet» 1

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Some questions in the exam assumed that student have some previous knowledge or background knowledge. I have some in metals, but nothing in polymers. So at the end all polymers looked the same. And we didn"t have any lectures about polymers properties, so the info gained from the lecturers weren"t enough.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Minor extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 28%

Significant extent» 2 28%

Great extent» 3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

7. How did you find the lectures?

7 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Average» 2 28%

Good» 4 57%

Very Good» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- The materials for the lectures could have been better. Some handouts or books maybe, but not a list of internet sites, where students don"t know what to look for. In internet sites there are too much information and you can"t prepare for the exam in this way, it will take enormous amount of time.» (Average)

8. How would you rate the polymer processing laboratory work?

7 svarande

Poor» 1 14%

Fair» 2 28%

Adequate» 2 28%

Good» 2 28%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

9. How would you rate the mechanical testing laboratory work?

7 svarande

Poor» 2 28%

Fair» 1 14%

Adequate» 1 14%

Good» 3 42%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- The laboratory parts where the worst part of the course, the course was for light weight materials and the laboratory parts didnt relate to this, the labs didnt show why the materials tested are considerd light weight or how they differ from other materials.» (Poor)
- The testing part and SEM were ok, but there should be some guide how to write the lab report, what should be included etc.» (Adequate)

10. How would you rate the fracture surfaces laboratory work?

7 svarande

Poor» 2 28%

Fair» 2 28%

Adequate» 1 14%

Good» 1 14%

Excellent» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- The laboratory parts where the worst part of the course, the course was for light weight materials and the laboratory parts didnt relate to this, the labs didnt show why the materials tested are considerd light weight or how they differ from other materials.» (Poor)
- Better and clearer instructions on how the work after all the laboratories are needed.» (Fair)
- This was nice, the supervisor really explained things well, not like in the tensile lab.» (Excellent)

11. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Minor extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 28%

Significant extent» 3 42%

Great extent» 2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It would have been good if all the litterature was clearly presented at the beggining of the course instead of being mentioned at lectures later on.» (Some extent)
- This is a big gap at the moment.» (Some extent)
- You could at least draw up some questions to help with learning, there was alot of material to read thru and i sometimes find it hard to find the relevent info.» (Significant extent)

12. How would you rate the project "Engineering Polymers"?

7 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 2 28%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 4 57%

Excellent» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- It was said that the project should be around 20 pages and it was quite hard to gather the information and put this project together. It took a lot of time, maybe a bit too much. And in the end you still studied the properties of one polymer, so all the other polymers properties were lost, at least for me. Maybe if the project would have been some analysis of different polymer, then I would have had some overview of polymers.» (Fair)

13. How would you rate the project "Analysis of two materials"?

7 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 6 85%

Excellent» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- This project was good, but I think there should be some detailed guidance, what parts should be included. All the groups handled the project in different way.» (Good)
- would like some more guidance with the project» (Good)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 4 57%

Very Good» 3 42%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- The lecturers were always there, but the study materials weren"t.» (Rather good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 1 14%

Very well» 6 85%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- I liked the lab group very much» (Very well)

16. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 71%

High» 2 28%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- 2 project+ labs+ lectures» (High)

17. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Reasonable» 3 42%

High» 3 42%

Too high» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 42%

Good» 4 57%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- It was clearly seen that the course was first time in English, there weren"t proper lecture slides or other materials(lab instructions).» (Adequate)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Projects and structure of lecture subjects.»
- the projects»
- The lectures, both Mats and Antal are great in teaching and explaining. Very easy to follow and understand.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More lecture slides as handouts, so students would understand what is important and what should be studied in detailed way. »
- guide lines to the labs and aspects that shall be included in the reports, they can be clearer.»
- The labs, much much more work to do compared to what we really did on the lab. The lab leaders need to explain more in detail what we should be done with the tasks. Difficult to get help if you got stucked.»
- The course litterature should be found on the homepage, and not on the internet or chans»

21. Are there overlaps with other courses and, if so, please point these out and evaluate whether or not the overlaps were negative.

- Some overlaps with the course Engineering metals, but with the different point of view.»
- yes. the rheology, composites and mechanical testing lectures are overlapped with Engineering Polymers, Composites and Nanocomposites Materials and Failure Analysis and Material Characterisation courses in MPAEM. The labs are working with the same equipments with the courses mentioned above too.»

22. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från