|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TEK121 2008, TEK121Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-12-17 - 2009-01-10 Antal svar: 20 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35% Kontaktperson: Violeta Roso» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Klass: Övriga Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
1. What is your study background?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.7 - It"s a good class. Dan is a very good lecturer and Violeta is a nice teacher as well. » (International master student) Your own effort2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.1 3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.6 - Thursday"s cousre is too intense» (75%) Teaching and course administration4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - Violeta needs to say something more besides reading of the slides to get students to attend her lectures.» (Large extent) 5. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.4 6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - Very good job!» (Very well) 7. To what extent has the assignment Transport Systems been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - The case did not learn me anything that were useful for the exam» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the assignment Intermodal Transport been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - Maybe make it more difficult...» (Some extent) 9. To what extent has the site visits (Volvo and Port of Göteborg) been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.95 - I think the site visits was held in relatively good time according to the studing schedule» (Large extent) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.95 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.45 - All were not happy with the assigned group.» (Rather poorly) 12. How was the course workload?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.8 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - I think the course were to easy I do not feel that I learned more than I have done of the previous logistic course at Chalmers. » (Fair) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The lessons presented the material very well, the site visit to the port and the Scheker-lesson was good.»- Assignment Transport Systems but in way that you can get more information about the different countries and not only a final presentation.» - Site visit » - I think all the course setting is quite good.» - students could learn more from the site visit» - The assignments» - all the visits and intermodal transport assignment» - The site visits» - Mainly the site visits.» - The visits. » - Site visits» - the visits to the port and Volvo, since it helps to understand the content of the lectures better.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Maybe a totaly new book instead of this old material with bad translation... There is no point of having 4 hours of presentation - this has to be changed in some way. Maybe integrate the transport allocation/route planning better in the other course material.»- The textbook maybe» - The level, should be more at masterlevel» - The schedule» - i think its perfect there is no need to change anything» - The assignements. The scope of the course should, in my opinion, be more advanced with more analytical tasks then just learning by heart the lenght of different things and finding statistics about countries that we will never use. » - For the AIT some other way of presenting the different countries. You cannot listen to 15 presentations in a row. Further on I think some kind of grading do is good, in order to make students work harder.» - Can"t really think of something» - The hand-in time and the presentations for ATS assignment should be placed earlier (e.g. at the mid of the quarter). When doing so, specific information about the different countries can be Incorporated in the lectures and so a broader pictures can be given.» 16. Additional comments- Good, Thanks very much!»- Maybe when students visit the port, they can get off the bus and be explained about the equipments and the work done in the port by the guider.» - I have a good impression of the course, site visits was quite interesting and useful. But it can be given more information than in the handouts on the Violeta"s lecture.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15%