Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Intercultural communication, SJO230
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2007-10-22 - 2007-11-22 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43% Kontaktperson: Fredrik Olindersson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Mark the following aspects of the course on a scale from 1 to 5 where 5 is best:1. The way it started in Gothenburg13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 5 | | 38% |
4» | | 3 | | 23% |
5» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I was out at sea, so I can not answer on that one.» (3)
- Little bit too confusing start. No general information about the school,ex. studentkår, studiekort etc.» (3)
- Motivated lecturer dedicated to his subject. » (5)
- Good start. Taking our experiences into account and starting with discussions and tasks triggering further work with the subjects.
Information could e better.» (5)
- The information was given very clear» (5)
2. The web platform, Learngate13 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 7% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 0 | | 0% |
4» | | 7 | | 53% |
5» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - This was the first course that is why some problems arised.» (4)
- Now then we know how to use I think it will be a great help.» (4)
- It is a good platform, we have to use it more.» (5)
- Very easy to use» (5)
3. The PowerPoint presentations (in Gothenburg or on the web)13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 3 | | 23% |
4» | | 5 | | 38% |
5» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Very nice and interesting. Maybe there coud have been a few hours more for this» (3)
- For the ones who are not able to come to gothenbourg it would be a good oppetunity to be able to perform it through the web» (3)
- The sound on Learngate was not good.» (4)
- Excellent to refresh with the powerpoints on the web» (5)
- Really good with sound.» (5)
4. The work assignments on the web13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 3 | | 23% |
4» | | 8 | | 61% |
5» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Most were good, soldier and indians not that good. ICC at work the best» (3)
- The idea to work in learngate is great, but too confusing task giving. What to do etc.» (3)
- Diffucult to follow all assignments if not all are engaged in the forum from start.» (4)
- Interesting and fun, but maybe it would have been better to have less number of assignments and put more effort into these. As it was now, you did your task and then moved on to the next one. Therefore there wasn"t so many discussions as you have hoped since you just want to move on to next assignment and are not as interested in the ones you already have finished.» (4)
- Could be clearer. As in Margaretas course.» (4)
5. The cooperation and atmosphere in the workgroup13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 4 | | 30% |
4» | | 6 | | 46% |
5» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I think some groups were better, my group was wery small and not to active.» (3)
- When all were engaged it worked out perfect.» (4)
- Good! And a good way to get to know each other. Since this was the first course I think it took time for us to learn how to use learngate. Cooperation is better for every course we take. » (4)
- Really good but not everyone put so much effort in the learngate forums» (4)
- Very good thanks to Erik.» (5)
- at least in our workgroup the atmosphere was good. Via learngate it is quite easy to communicate with each other» (5)
6. The interview and essay assignment13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 3 | | 23% |
4» | | 6 | | 46% |
5» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Fun and interesting. Too short of time to be able to do it properly though. There was not enough time to order books an articles on the library since there was a interviewee involved and it took time to find them, and then also to know the outcome from the interview in advance made it hard to prepare before the interview was done. » (4)
- good learening experience.» (4)
- A bit difficult to understand the conection between them and how to make them.» (4)
- A little confusing mixing the two tasks.» (5)
- At least I found this assignment good. i llearned a lot and it is always good to learn interview methods » (5)
7. Feedback from other students on your work13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 2 | | 15% |
3» | | 3 | | 23% |
4» | | 6 | | 46% |
5» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Not much feedback» (2)
- Have not received opposition for the essay yet.» (4)
- Good. We did it partly on mail though. Maybe we didn"t trust learngate so much at that time.. :)» (4)
- I cooperated with one other person in the group, sharing thoughts during the writing of the essay. The others didnt response.» (4)
- Good, can always be better. » (4)
- i got quite much feedback. Wich I had been more active myself too.» (5)
8. Feedback from the teacher13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 3 | | 23% |
4» | | 7 | | 53% |
5» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Not much feedback, but the feedback I got was positive» (2)
- More feedback from the teacher.» (3)
- Quick, postive and engouraging!» (4)
- Enuugh but not too much. It coud have come more but offcourse the teachers have other things to do also.» (4)
- Better» (4)
9. Clarity of instructions and materials13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 3 | | 23% |
3» | | 5 | | 38% |
4» | | 3 | | 23% |
5» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - All sources differed. There was one thing said during the lesson, another showed on the time schedule, and a third on learngate (concering tasks and time when they were supposed to be done). Easiest way is to have everything on learngate so you can follow that. If there are changes, they should be noted there and nowhere else. » (2)
- Material ok, but instructions not.» (2)
- Some changes during the course, confusing» (3)
- Could be clearer. A easy to follow list on the web will do.» (3)
- I find it easy to use the materials everything was available on the Internet, this was good» (5)
10. Help from the teacher when you need it13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 2 | | 15% |
4» | | 7 | | 53% |
5» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - hard to say did not asked so much for help» (3)
- Very good!» (5)
11. The timing and deadlines of the assignments13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 7 | | 53% |
4» | | 6 | | 46% |
5» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - See 4 & 9» (3)
- sharper deadlines of loading assignemts on the web.» (3)
- Difficult to meet.» (3)
- deadlines came very fast» (4)
- Good» (4)
12. Your interest for ICC as a subject before the course13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 3 | | 23% |
3» | | 3 | | 23% |
4» | | 6 | | 46% |
5» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - ?» (3)
- Intercultural meetings have always been interesting. » (4)
- I think the importance and the value of ethnic cultural differences is sometimes overstated and can be an easy way to cover other human communication problems.» (4)
13. Your interest for ICC as a subject after the course13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 0 | | 0% |
4» | | 7 | | 53% |
5» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 4.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Same interest, but now with some basic theory and tools. Maybe another way of approaching it now. » (4)
- Very interesting» (4)
- Good lecturer and discussions will always trigger more interest.» (5)
- Eric was very nice and he gave much to think about» (5)
14. Coordination with the Introduction module13 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 7% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 6 | | 46% |
4» | | 4 | | 30% |
5» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - It was really boring to present the essay two times...» (3)
- It was good. And the student writing manual helped also a lot» (4)
- Good, tasks & deadlines evenly spread out during the weeks of work on distance. A little hard to combinate the ICC essay to be an academic one, but that was our own choice so...» (5)
- Could be clearer.» (5)
15. The way the course ended in Mariehamn11 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 6 | | 54% |
4» | | 4 | | 36% |
5» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Was still at sea, working» (?)
- Not as good as rest of the course. But not much to do maybe if people can"t keep the dealines. » (3)
- Ok, but I think everything should be ready aat the examination, But we got another assignment, just a short one but it wasnt really what was expected...» (3)
- Not so good because of the students. the deadlines where not reached» (3)
- To short, will miss Erik» (5)
16. Your overall mark of the ICC module12 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 8% |
3» | | 1 | | 8% |
4» | | 7 | | 58% |
5» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Interesting, important and fun! Also a good idea to start the program with this course. Erik is a very very inspiring lecturer. » (4)
- Erik is a fantastic lecturer and a great resource, and the subject important to work with.» (5)
- As I said I"m interested about the subject now» (5)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.78
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.78 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.69
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|