ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Lars Trygg, TEK150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-16 - 2009-01-20
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: lars trygg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

1. Attendance on lectures

How many percent of the lectures did you attend?

21 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»1 4%
>75%»20 95%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- lectures were interresting and added value» (>75%)
- every lectures» (>75%)
- I think the lectures were good, especially the one about organizational modes.» (>75%)

2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 30%
Very well»14 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- average» (?)

3. How demanding was the course?

21 svarande

Not at all demanding»0 0%
Slightly demanding»3 14%
Quite demanding»9 42%
Demanding»9 42%
Very demanding»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- mostly concerning the report but well balanced with few lectures, and good literature reviews» (Demanding)

4. Did you buy the course book?

21 svarande

yes»20 95%
no, too expensive»0 0%
no, other reason»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.09

- It was good!» (yes)
- i got from my senior» (no, other reason)

5. How much of the recommended chapters in the book have you read?

21 svarande

0-25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»2 9%
75-100%»19 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- all chapters, even 11 and 12» (75-100%)

6. How did you find the book

21 svarande

poorly written»1 4%
ok»10 47%
well written»10 47%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- sometimes a bit hard to read because of a lot of long sentences» (ok)
- Good contents but the structure makes it boring to read. It"s a bit old. Why don"t you write a new one Lars?» (ok)
- The authors sometimes complicate thiings that are simple, and they could have a much better flow and structure.» (ok)
- Since it is a rather old book, many of the examples were not up to date.. The examples worked, but it would have been fun to also see newer, more up-to-date examples as well.» (ok)
- Intresting!» (well written)

7. How useful were the lecture notes?

21 svarande

did not use them»2 9%
useless»0 0%
somewhat useful»9 42%
good to have them»7 33%
very useful»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- I mostly used the handouts» (somewhat useful)

8. On average, how would you rate the amount of material covered in one lecture?

20 svarande

Boringly little»2 10%
OK but more could be added»2 10%
Just about right on average»14 70%
OK but some material could be removed»2 10%
Way too much to absorb per lecture»0 0%
Don»0

Genomsnitt: 2.8

9. How did you find the lectures?

21 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»0 0%
rather good»5 23%
very good»13 61%
excellent»3 14%
no comment»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Some better than others, but on average, very good.» (very good)

10. How many of recommended exercises did you do?

21 svarande

0-25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»8 38%
75-100%»13 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

11. What did you think about the bonus assignment?

- Interesting Topic, good to learn on real examples»
- Very rewarding. But, it should be hand in and presented earlier to be able to study for examination.»
- it is good, but what happens if you got 5 bonus points and you miss 2 points to passe the exam ??? They should be used also to pass the course as you also have worked hard on the topic (report and presentation) !»
- I have written it before and will write it again. YOU MUST START CONTROLLING THE QUALITY OF THE GROUPS. No check too see if everyone have participated, nothing.»
- It"s a good idea. But i prefer 10 points for assignments, since we spend much time to search and organize the subject.»
- ?»
- It is a good concept, though a bit hard to motivate everyone to work with it, mostly because the material is not covered in the exam (work work-effort will not give you better chances)»
- Quite time-taking, but at the same time good learning.»
- The topic report was great. I didn"t learn much from the case study though. »
- Good, I like bonus points instead of assignments which are a part of the exam. »
- Good»
- Interesting»
- Good to get extrapoints for the exam»
- good, but i think the bonus points should count for grade 3 as well»
- If the bonus assignment refers to the topic report, than i think this was a good assignment, very useful.»
- good for developing technical writing skills»

12. Which parts of the course did you find difficult?

- The examination»
- The litture questions were diffucult but always good explained on the lessons»
- Topic report»
- DFM and Article about Uncertainty because we didn"t study the article, and we had only a few slides on DFM and DFA.»
- none»
- The book was written in a complex manner and if you didn"t expalin them , I would never understand some parts.»
- no speciall»
- The topic report was time taking, it"s always hard to get started.»
- Understanding the different types of prototyping was the most difficult part. The book was not very clear there.»
- nothing particulare.»
- Quite hard questions to the literature seminar»
- nothing»
- same level on all the parts»
- The applied material case.. It was a bit tricky, but still interesting..»
- nothing»

13. What about the availability of the teacher if you needed help?

21 svarande

Very good»9 42%
Good»6 28%
OK»2 9%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
I did not seek help»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Teacher always available to help students.» (Very good)
- very good and fast response from teacher when needed» (Very good)

14. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?

21 svarande

poor»1 4%
fair»3 14%
adequate»3 14%
good»10 47%
excellent»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- The question about DFA was not fair. You just discuss the problem but I haven"t any idea about its principels.Maybe it"s my problem.» (poor)
- not 100 % as it was really precise on Galbraith"s article, and we didn"t spend as much time on DFA as we spent on the Design-Build-Test cycle or croos-functional teams for example.» (adequate)
- too much points on the topicreports.» (adequate)
- 20% of the total points on topic reports...Would have been better with 10% » (good)
- I didnt think the question about the different team structures for the applied material case was of use.. » (good)
- however we were told essay questions were going to be developed. And the examinatio was rather specific.» (excellent)

15. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»14 66%
Excellent»5 23%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- lars has used different methods to learn us, everything that complements the odrinary lectures has been vary good. Litt review, lean game etc.» (Good)
- I have learned a lot of interesting things, hope I will be able to use them when back in France !!!» (Good)
- Good mixture of lectures, group work, seminars and workshops.» (Good)
- Good learning, very structured and organized.» (Excellent)
- Very interesing cours, I like the lean Games a lot! - Good learning!» (Excellent)
- Alot due to the well rouded nature of the course. Workshops, seminars, topics and classes woven together in a fine way. Big thanks to Lars Trygg for all the support and wisdom.» (Excellent)
- great subject, applicable almost everywhere in one term or another.» (Excellent)
- I think it was a good and interesting course..» (Excellent)

16. Other comments/suggestions for how the course can be improved?

- Didn"t find too much of integration with the visitors presentation and the class material»
- Interesting and well structured course. Literature reviews are good. The teacher is clear, friendly and competent.»
- I don"t agree with the idea of topic review on course. I hoped that you discussed more about the problems. But you just defined new problems. I think it"s better focus on book and discuss adequately chapters. The lean game was very good. Thanks for you attention»
- I think that the seminars is really good! maybe some changes are needed to get the discussion going among the participants»
- -Well done Lars!»
- Overall a nice course. »
- All in all, a great course. A minor detail could be that the book is a bit dated. Yes, it is great and well written taking up the essentials, but perhaps the litterature should meet the rapid changing industry. What about the interesting areas of the topic reports? Perhaps this should be covered in the litterature as well.»
- more literature reviews or something similar»
- Perhaps changing the litterature..and the applied materials case was very interesting, but also difficult to relate to the material in the book...»
- Maybe, it there is more recent literature books to use...»
- Learning will be much better if the students r involved during the lectures. Regular traditional lectures r difficult to absorb at MS level.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.28
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.28
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.57

Kursutvärderingssystem från