ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Strategic Environmental Assessment, ENM040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-16 - 2009-01-13
Antal svar: 2
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Are Wallin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. Did the course meet up to the expectations you had before the course?

2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»2 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. Have you been able to achieve the learning outcomes (as specified in the course-PM)?

2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

3. What is your opinion on the course content and scope? Any parts or aspects that should be taken out or added? Any parts on which focus should be increased or reduced?

- course content was good and scope was broad,more attention should be given if students are using literature in a way they should.»

4. Do you think the course was well-organized?

2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»0 0%
No»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 2

- yes, We had teachers from various fields which was good.» (Yes)

5. What is your background?

Programme, under graduate education etc.

- I have done master in Env Sci, and bachelors in Microbiology, Env Sci»

6. Was the course appropriate with regard to your background?

It was:

2 svarande

Too easy»0 0%
At the right level»1 50%
Too difficult»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- may be it is course to be taken at the end of your masters» (Too difficult)

7. What did you think of the lectures?

Matrisfråga

Course introduction (Sverker, Are)
2 svarande

Good»1 50%
OK»1 50%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

SEA Procedure (Sverker)
2 svarande

Good»1 50%
OK»1 50%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Decision criteria and priority setting (Anders)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Process and Content Tools (Sverker)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Causal chains (Sverker)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Social sciences (Helena, Lena)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

SEA legislation (Lena)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Policy process (Helena)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Institutions-centred SEA (Anders)
1 svarande

Good»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

SEA Evaluation (Daniel)
1 svarande

Good»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Soft systems and SEA (Sverker)
1 svarande

Good»1 100%
OK»0 0%
Not good»0 0%
Didn"t attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

8. How did you like seminar I?

Matrisfråga

Did the short paper help you in the preparation for the seminar?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Did the seminar help you in understanding of concepts and messages presented in the articles?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Was the seminar sufficient in depth?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Was the seminar sufficient in scope?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Was the seminar supporting you to achieve the learning outcomes of the course?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

9. How did you like seminars II?

Matrisfråga

- There was too much to read. »

Did the short paper help you in the preparation for the seminar?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Did the seminar help you in understanding of concepts and messages presented in the articles?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Was the seminar sufficient in depth?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Was the seminar sufficient in scope?
1 svarande

Yes»1 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Was the seminar supporting you to achieve the learning outcomes of the course?
1 svarande

Yes»1 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

10. The project, part I

Matrisfråga

Was the instructions sufficient?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»1 50%
No»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Enough hand-ins?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Did you receive sufficient support from supervisors?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Did it support you in achieving the learning outcomes of the course?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Did the co-operation within the group work?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Was the task too big?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»1 50%
No»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

11. The project, part II

Matrisfråga

Was the instructions sufficient?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»0 0%
No»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 2

Enough hand-ins?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Did you receive sufficient support from supervisors?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Did it support you in achieving the learning outcomes of the course?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»2 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Did the co-operation within the group work?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Was the task too big?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»2 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

12. Course literature

Matrisfråga

- yes the literature was good but difficult to understand. Students need help from teacher to clarify terms»

Was it interesting?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Was it understandable?
2 svarande

Yes»1 50%
Partly»1 50%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Did it support you in achieving the learning outcomes of the course?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»2 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

13. How was the workload of the course?

2 svarande

High»1 50%
Reasonable»1 50%
Low»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- It was nice experience but workload is too much for students from time point of view » (High)

14. What did you think of the exam?

Matrisfråga

- The amount of literature to read for exam was too much and then to take out actual information. It would be nice if each teacher in their lecture can give a doc file of their lecture.»

Was the questions relevant in relation to the course content and learning outcomes?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Was it too difficult?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»2 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Did you have sufficient time to write the exam?
2 svarande

Yes»0 0%
Partly»0 0%
No»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 3

Did the exam provide an opportunity for learning?
2 svarande

Yes»2 100%
Partly»0 0%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

15. Please give further opinions, comments and suggestions how the course can be improved below!

- I liked course in a way, It was new to me. I learned much from it. the social and political aspects of the policy formation and SEA. I would suggests: two projects ,2 exercises and 2 seminar for 15 cr. with the same literature will be good. 2 exercises can be given to students which will demand the clarification of definitions used in the whole course, as i am from science background it was difficult for me to read the literature. also in each lecture the teachers can give some written material that they are going to discuss e.g. Helena did give us a doc file of her seminar that helped me to understand policy process. and in each lecture teachers should ask briefly about the last lecture they taught. In that way if any student needs more attention on clarification of terms it should be given. because the terms and concepts used specially in hague book and some papers are of political science and may be difficult to understand to science student.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från