Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Course evaluation Design of silent products 2008, VTA 155
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2009-01-15 - 2009-01-15 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 70% Kontaktperson: Krister Larsson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.7 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 4 | | 57% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 42% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.42 - - Since the course was divided into two periods.» (At most 15 hours/week)
2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend? 7 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 14% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 28% |
100%» | | 4 | | 57% |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - almost all.» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus (see http://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=11358) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. To what extent do you feel like you have obtained the knowledge stated in the learning outcomes?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 71% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.7 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 7 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Is the working method appropriate to achieve the goals?The working method was based on learning by doing and requires individual initiatives and engagement from the students.7 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 14% |
Yes, definitely» | | 6 | | 85% |
I don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?7 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 14% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 14% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 5 | | 71% |
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - There is no exam» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Teaching and course administration7. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - no real lectures, more like guided project work » (?)
8. How was the presentation speed in the lectures?6 svarande
much too slow» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too slow» | | 3 | | 50% |
adequate» | | 3 | | 50% |
a bit too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - no real lectures, more like guided project work » (?)
9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?7 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 14% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 85% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - Vauge information on the web. Not all lectures put on the web.» (Rather badly)
10. How do you judge the level of difficulty of the assignments?6 svarande
much too difficult» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too difficult» | | 0 | | 0% |
adequate» | | 5 | | 83% |
a bit too easy» | | 1 | | 16% |
much too easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - no real assignments, more like guided project work » (?)
11. Was the time period assigned for the assignments sufficient?The time period was...6 svarande
much too short.» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too short.» | | 0 | | 0% |
adequate.» | | 6 | | 100% |
a bit too long.» | | 0 | | 0% |
much too long.» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 12. Where the assignments corrected like announced in the hand-out "Comments on assignments"?5 svarande
not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
more or less» | | 3 | | 60% |
fairly well» | | 2 | | 40% |
completely» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - I think it was ok.» (?)
Experimental workTheses question only concern courses with laboratory work 13. How well was the experimental work supported by the lectures?7 svarande
The lectures were essential for the experimental work» | | 3 | | 42% |
There is a need form more lectures» | | 0 | | 0% |
One could have managed the experimental work wihout lectures» | | 4 | | 57% |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 - no real lectures, more like guided project work » (One could have managed the experimental work wihout lectures)
14. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 14% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - no real lectures, more like guided project work » (Some extent)
15. How helpful was the supervision of experimental work?6 svarande
very helpful» | | 3 | | 50% |
moderatly helpful» | | 3 | | 50% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 16. How helpful was the supervision of analysing data?6 svarande
Very helpful» | | 4 | | 66% |
Moderatly helpful» | | 2 | | 33% |
Not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.33 - Personally, I did not seek any help.» (?)
17. How did you percieve the correction of the report?7 svarande
adequate» | | 5 | | 71% |
not relevant» | | 1 | | 14% |
too demanding» | | 1 | | 14% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.42 - I really appreciated the comments!» (adequate)
Study climate18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the professor?7 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 42% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 57% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.57 19. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistent?6 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 16% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 83% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - Who was the course assistant?» (?)
20. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?7 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 14% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 28% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 57% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 21. How was the course workload?7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 71% |
High» | | 2 | | 28% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 22. How was the total workload this study period?7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 14% |
High» | | 5 | | 71% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Summarizing questions23. What is your general impression of the course?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 14% |
Good» | | 4 | | 57% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 4.14 - Best course so far in Applied Acoustics!» (Excellent)
24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The amount of practical work, the freedom.»
- Working more or less alone (without help from the teacher)»
- Everything»
- the idea with the course»
25. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Perhaps could the study visit take place earlier?»
- An product not so "acoustically" well designed as the heat pump... i.e. easier to reduce the noise»
- Not to have it during 2 periods, it does not match any other course»
26. Additional comments- :)»
- Great course, I learnt a lot having fun in the same time»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|