Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Industrial Engineering, MTT050

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-10 - 2009-01-10
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Peter Almström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 23%
Around 20 hours/week»12 46%
Around 25 hours/week»6 23%
Around 30 hours/week»1 3%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.19

- The work load was really low» (At most 15 hours/week)
- only the exercises is put time on» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»3 11%
75%»13 50%
100%»10 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- The pace of the lecures could be higher» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 46%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

25 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»22 88%
No, the goals are set too high»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

24 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»8 33%
Yes, definitely»2 8%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»13 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»14 53%
Large extent»10 38%
Great extent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- The excercies should be bigger» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»6 23%
Some extent»10 38%
Large extent»10 38%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- Think the course literature is very, very bad. For example an entire chapter to describe how a stopwatch works and how big the board, the analysis writes on, should be. That is embarrassing.» (Small extent)
- the course book is not very good, does not really reflect the course. i gave up reading it early on and only studied handouts and lectures. » (Small extent)
- good slides» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

26 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Rather well»14 53%
Very well»11 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

26 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»2 7%
Rather good»9 34%
Very good»12 46%
I did not seek help»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- No one dares to put any questions, since the lecturer (Peter Almström) answers cheeky and try to disgrace the students.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»2 7%
Rather poorly»2 7%
Rather well»4 15%
Very well»18 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- a lot of problems in organizing and carrying out the company visit.» (Very poorly)
- Unfortunately we had an issue with the ppa session. Some of the exchange students didn"t prepared themself for the company visit, didn"t read email and didn"t showed up in time when we should visit the company, showed up late on meetings and didn"t performed well when writing the report.» (Very poorly)
- From my experience, foreign students rather keep to themselves.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

26 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»4 15%
Adequate»15 57%
High»5 19%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

12. How was the total workload this study period?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 7%
Adequate»9 34%
High»12 46%
Too high»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Towards the end. But that is perfectly normal.» (High)
- The workload was not evenly during the studie period. It was not possible to do that much in the beginning, but than we got much to do in both courses in the end. » (High)
- Simulation of production systems takes a lot of time.» (High)
- Too low in the beginning and too high in the end, after week 4» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»4 15%
Fair»2 7%
Adequate»9 34%
Good»9 34%
Excellent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- I think the course name should be something like production improvement. The lectures could have dealt with how you should work to be able to improve a factory. Now I just got the impression that we got a lot of methods that we dont know when to use.» (Poor)
- The content is for sure important, but how it is presented by the lecturer is poor. » (Fair)
- the course literature is quite poor» (Adequate)
- More and larger excersizes. We should have used ProBalance in the course» (Good)
- interesting with study visit» (Good)
- Excellent mix of guest lectures and "normal" lectures.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- assessements»
- the guest lectures»
- Group exercises. More study visits (too bad that Volvo couldn"t take us)»
- The study visites was really interesting»
- The exercises are good»
- dfa, company visits»
- company visit»
- Last lecture - harvesting!»
- The company visit!»
- the harvest lecture»
- company visit»
- modern concepts and related software»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- workload and reading instrutions»
- The video analyzed in the Axix task was much too long»
- the pace of the teacher"s speaking»
- AviX-exercise need to have clearer instructions.»
- Make the exercices bigger or put more material into the course»
- Peter Almström is so uninspired and he is mumbling during the lectures. It is rather hard to hear what he says...»
- shorter avix video and more details about the programme. better instructions»
- Increase workload! The book should be availible from day 1. »
- Reading instructions in one document.»
- Heavier workload»
- the whole course layout.»
- course literature»

16. Additional comments

- no»
- I think this is a rather good course, but Peter makes it extremely boring.»
- To much focus on the standard time systems on lecturs, there are more interesting things in the book to have lectures about!»
- Peter could be more enthusiastic! The harvest lecture was the best of the whole course, because of Klaus enthusiasm.»
- ok it a nice opportunity to know about industrial engineering»

Kursutvärderingssystem från