ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SCM design project, SSY225, HT2008

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-09 - 2009-01-05
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»6 46%
Around 25 hours/week»2 15%
Around 30 hours/week»3 23%
At least 35 hours/week»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 7%
50%»3 23%
75%»3 23%
100%»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- Annelis lectures» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 38%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 15%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 38%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- Kursen var i alla fall nyttig vad än målet var» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- It would be good to have some goals» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- We stated the goals in the project plan.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 80%
No, the goals are set too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- I think that our project was to extensive.» (No, the goals are set too high)
- It depends on what type of project it is.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»2 16%
To some extent»3 25%
Yes, definitely»1 8%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- It was a project.» (?)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»7 53%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»1 7%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.53

- ...eftersom man jobbade på egen hand» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»7 58%
Some extent»3 25%
Large extent»2 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.58

- There was no course literature. A lot of research by ourselves.» (?)
- No particular litterature.» (Small extent)
- We had no litterature» (Small extent)
- ...eftersom det inte fanns mycket gemensamt för alla grupperna» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»4 30%
Rather badly»7 53%
Rather well»2 15%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

- The whole course felt unprepared. Too much was not done before course start. I would not recommend this course.» (Very badly)
- Probably the worst administration ever! The schedule was not available until week 2 and then all info has been very late. For example, we got a mail today, thursday, with a template for the final report, that was due yesterday for reviewing!!! Students have other things to do besides school too, and cannot be assumed to be able to change plan with just a few days notice! Also, the course was away and didn"t answer to mail just some week before the course should start. That is not acceptable either.» (Very badly)
- This course is the last course at Chalmers and it was probably one, if not the worst, of them all when it comes to the administration. An example is that the project report template came out when about every group was finished with their respective report. Thoose who wanted access to the XP labb and were told they would get it if they had attended the "kandidatarbete" course, they could get it automatically. (I never got it and neither did half of my mates). When we mailed the examinor it took forever to get an answer. When we asked for help with course administration it took forever.» (Very badly)
- Poor information and the information was often late.» (Rather badly)
- Saker kom ofta ganska sent men det gick ändå bra så för att det viktigaste fick man lösa själv.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»1 7%
Rather poor»5 38%
Rather good»4 30%
Very good»3 23%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

- Vår grupp fick inte så mycket hjälp av handledaren, bara olika förslag som ofta inte var användbara...» (Rather poor)
- From supervisor - good. » (Rather good)
- Our supervisor was Bo Egardt, and he was very good and commited to our project.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»9 69%
Very well»4 30%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Some worked more, some worked less. The main problem is the language, it was often difficult to understand the exchange student.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 38%
High»4 30%
Too high»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- A project of this extent should include more points.» (Too high)
- Considering the size of the undertaken project.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»3 23%
High»4 30%
Too high»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Depends on me, I have read twice the amount of recommended points...» (Too high)
- Because of this course» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»4 30%
Fair»2 15%
Adequate»3 23%
Good»4 30%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- Many fun and interesting project, but handeled in a bad way.» (Poor)
- Catastrofic planning and bad administration» (Poor)
- Not structured enough, bad last minute changes that did not turnout good etc..» (Poor)
- Seems that the supervisor need to be more involved with the existing equipment.» (Fair)
- I think we had to little knowledge to solve the task. We gained knowledge during the time but it would be good if more "real" automation was included in previous courses. Too much time were spent on writing reports and solving administrative tasks that should be solved before the start of the project.» (Fair)
- Projects courses are good and different from the normal exam courses. You learn to cooperate and work "for real". But as I said - administration was disastrous!» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Choice of projects (wide range of specializations)»
- Advice the students to use both of the periods for the projct due to reach the gaols.»
- The course in general»
- Nothing»
- Don"t know. The possibility to participate in cool projects.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Administrative part. Dates need to be set. Special workshop hours is needed. More information concerning how to order, what should be documented, who will grade. Feedback from both Anneli and supervisor for planning report was not too good, since they differed alot (one said "write", one said "take away"). »
- Better planned projects. It would have been fun to programm a small production line.»
- Administration, or - if it is his fault - the course responsible.»
- Kursen borde ha varit bättre organiserad. Vi behövde jobba i XP-verkstaden men fick inte tillräckligt lång tid för att jobba där och konsultera saker med verkstadens personal som var hjälpsam men hade varken tid eller plats för oss i verkstaden. Konsekvenserna av detta är ett misslyckande med vårt projekt.»
- Planning of the course, project subjects (need to be realistic workload), the commitment of teachers and supervisors, the extent of reports, more focus on result etc.»
- Pretty much everything, see other comments.»
- The size of the projects considering the given time. It should be better specified what the actual goal is of the coarse, if it is the administration part or the engineering part.»

16. Additional comments

- Maybee some questions in the evaluation wehre not relevant.»
- Ändå tycker jag kursen var bra men kan bli mycket bättre nästa år. Mycket beror på handledarna och planeringen innan kursen börjar.»
- Should be better to keep the old Mechatronics project as last year. That had been fun.»
- The course administration was very bad. See above comments. One thing that was VERY bad was that the different responsible professors/Phds for all the projects didn"t have the same vision as the examinor. The examinor said, when asked, that the focus should be on the project report, status report, project plant whilst the professors etc helping us had a vision that the construction/design/math was important. It is very bad when not everyone involved in the course have the same clear vision... I and most of my friends were very disappointed with the course. We were hoping the course would put more focus on what we had learned, and not on writing report after report. There is MUCH to change till next year.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från