ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Medicine for the engineer, SSY180, HT2008

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-09 - 2009-01-05
Antal svar: 31
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 24%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

31 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»26 83%
Around 20 hours/week»5 16%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.16

- As few as possible» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

31 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»4 12%
50%»2 6%
75%»15 48%
100%»10 32%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Most of the lectures were very interesting!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

31 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»9 29%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 22%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 48%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

27 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»24 88%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»3 11%
To some extent»16 59%
Yes, definitely»7 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- The exam was just to measure the ability of memorizing names!!!» (No, not at all)
- There could have been som kind of assignment/project work in the course.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

31 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»13 41%
Large extent»6 19%
Great extent»12 38%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

- Some lecturers were better than others. Some had a very poor english. Would have been good if the lecture material was up on the homepage BEFORE the lectures so that you can bring it to class an put your own notes on. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

31 svarande

Small extent»3 9%
Some extent»8 25%
Large extent»11 35%
Great extent»9 29%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Did not read the book» (Small extent)
- The book is very nice but the lectures seem to cover the course very well» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

30 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»5 16%
Rather well»17 56%
Very well»8 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Handouts were uploaded on the website after the lectures instead of before. There were some cancelled lectures and misunderstandings between the lecturers. More information should be put on the website.» (Rather badly)
- Would have been good to have the handouts BEFORE class. I think it was bad that there was only a notice on the webpage if the lecturer was sick. One time when that happened you could not even log into "studentportalen" and see this notice. Would have been much better if an e-mail was sent to all the students taking the course!» (Rather badly)
- sporadic handouts on webpage. Would be good to have them all before the lectures.» (Rather badly)
- An e-mail when the lectures are cancelled would be apprichiated..» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

31 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»10 32%
Very good»11 35%
I did not seek help»9 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

31 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»2 6%
Rather well»12 38%
Very well»8 25%
I did not seek cooperation»8 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- non was required» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

31 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»9 29%
Adequate»18 58%
High»2 6%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Could have been a project or something similar.» (Low)
- High but adequate I think. I didn"t know anything about medicine before, so I had to learn everything. But I think it is normal» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

31 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 6%
Adequate»19 61%
High»7 22%
Too high»3 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

31 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»9 29%
Good»10 32%
Excellent»10 32%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Albeit too easy for Biotechnicians/Chemists» (Adequate)
- Interesting course which gives a lot of knowlage of things good to know in life (=allmännbildanade!)» (Excellent)
- Very good teachers!» (Excellent)
- one of the most interesting courses I have attended in many aspects.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lecture slides uploaded on the course website, they helped me to learn»
- the lecturers»
- -Peeker and Skoglund -Multiple choice exam»
- Peeker and the lecturer on respiratory system was very good.»
- It is great to have lecturer from different fields of medicine who share their view on the topic with us.»
- The different guest lecturers were rather good. The information of different ilnesses and their treatment is the most interesting part. Continue to make it possible for the students to ask question, so that it is a dialogue.»
- All.»
- All teachers»
- Ralph Peeker had very good lectures.»
- The lectures are very interestening!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Upload the slides earlier in the quarter to print them and follow the lecture with, write some comments on them.»
- Perhaps more interesting films, photos etc in Nilssons lectures like other techers have. Nilsons lecture tend to be a bit boring...»
- Some of the lecturer were very boring to lissen to. I think the time for lectures are awful. The students are very tired, which gives bad attendance. There could also be a little bit less lectures.»
- As we are studying biomedical engineering, it is better to focus on functions of the human body parts not to introducing the names and measuring the ability to memorizing names at exam!»
- The lecture was held pretty late. That makes it hard to stay concentrated!»
- The lecture about different tissue types was mostly taken straight from the book. It could have been taught in a more interesting way. Put more exam questions on the website and do it in the beginning of the course.»
- That the teachers refers more to the cours book»
- The lecturer with tissues, endocrine system was terrible! He did not even have slides that the students could use to study, he just had pictures from the book. Very bad english as well!»

16. Additional comments

- It is a very interesting course and but the exam could include more questions. I was finished after 20 minutes and it was an easy exam compared to other courses at Chalmers.»
- Very good course with excellent lecturers. Great as it is right now. Great as compliment to Biomedical Instrumentation course.»
- I can understand that the lecturers sometimes have difficulties with spoken english, this is to be expected. They should however have notes with them in good english if they know they are not 100% on the use of english language. This will be better for the students and the lecture will be much better.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från