Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Soft Matter Physics 2008, TIF015

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-08 - 2009-01-28
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Hicham Sabir»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

Estimate the total time, that is, the time you spent in class or outside class working on this course. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 10 h/week»2 18%
About 10-15 h/week»6 54%
About 15-20 h/week»1 9%
About 20-25 h/week»2 18%
Over 25 h/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- I would have liked to work more on this course, but I had another course that took far too much time in the same study period.» (About 15-20 h/week)

2. How was the course work load?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Reasonable»10 90%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Though the extent to which some details were required seemed overboard.» (Reasonable)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0-25 %»0 0%
25-50 %»1 9%
50-75 %»1 9%
75-100 %»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- I really liked the lunch seminars» (75-100 %)

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Minor extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It helped in understanding the course and keeping us in the said important details.» (Large extent)
- Both Johan and Alexander are very pedagogic and the lectures were very interesting.» (Great extent)

5. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Minor extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- I"m not very impressed of the course literature. Much easier to get the content of the course during the lectures.» (Some extent)
- The grading would have made it better.» (Some extent)

6. Do you think the experiments brought during the lectures were:

11 svarande

Not interesting and useless»0 0%
Fun but useless»2 18%
Not very fun but useful»1 9%
Both fun and useful»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- They don"t take much time, and are perhaps good motivation.» (Fun but useless)

7. How close was the examination to what was studied during the lectures?

9 svarande

Very far»2 22%
Quite far»2 22%
Quite close»5 55%
Very close»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- A number of questions in the exam were ambiguous and much unlike patterns in the past and in the exercises.» (Quite far)
- in my opinion, more problem solving classes are needed. Also, during problem solving class, it would be better bot to repaet the baisc theory but foxus on problem solving.» (Quite far)

8. What do you think about the utility of the course homepage?

11 svarande

Useless»0 0%
Rather useless»0 0%
Rather useful»9 81%
Very useful»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

Linked to this course we had presentations from researchers working in both universities and companies.

9. How linked were these presentations to the course?

9 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Rather far»2 22%
Rather close»7 77%
Very close»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Some felt closer than others» (Rather close)

10. How many topics on which we had a presentation can you immediately cite?

11 svarande

None»1 9%
1 9%
6 54%
2 18%
All»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Johan and Alexander were both very friendly to us and gladly answered our questions.» (Very good)
- It was really great. Alex and Johan agreed to help always, they reaaly put their time on our understanding. It was a lot of fruitfull discussions, I wish all teachers were like that!» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»1 10%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»4 40%
I did not seek collaboration»1

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Overall impression and specific recommendations

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»2 20%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Really great course !» (?)
- The content of the course was very interesting, but it was hard to digest as the lectures was only a rapid stream of power point slides, disapearing before you had read them.» (Fair)
- It contains a lot of interesting topics that clearify other fields of research as well...» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lunch seminars, the homework problems»
- The type of handins were good»
- The course content»
- Everything.»
- The course content should be preserved.»
- General style»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The problem solving classes could perhaps have been a bit more structured and well organized. »
- Perhaps a laboration or so.»
- Power point hand outs available on the webpage before class»
- The lectures. Use boards to write down what is important at leav out (or show on power point) what is less important.»
- The exam question pattern should be regular and not ambiguous typed. Example of such was, Why is glass a soft matter? This involves one aspect of the course and the whole course at the same time. Treating its as any or even both does not seem to meet the requirement of a full mark.»
- Problem solvin classes hould be added!!!»

16. Additional comments

- Technically, I am not a student at Chalmers but at Gothenburg University and I have taken the course through GU, even if it is the same course.»
- Very good course Johan and Alexander»
- Thank you very much it was extremely nice!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från