ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Microsystems technology, MKM110, MPMIC, HT2008, MKM110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-07 - 2009-01-23
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 33%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»1 16%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 83%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I have not seen/read the goals» (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 16%
Yes, definitely»4 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 66%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- The web page should be updated regularly.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 16%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 33%
Adequate»3 50%
High»1 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 33%
Adequate»3 50%
High»1 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Course-specific questions:

13. How was the way of teaching?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 33%
Rather good»3 50%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

14. How do you think about the teacher"s presentation?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

15. How do you think about the lecture"s slides (the PPT files)?

6 svarande

Poor (Please give comments)»1 16%
OK to follow, but slides need improvement (comment please)»2 33%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- the slides usually comprised of some figures and there were few description about them.» (Poor (Please give comments))
- More notes are needed» (OK to follow, but slides need improvement (comment please))
- more text» (OK to follow, but slides need improvement (comment please))
- not too much text and information in slides» (Good)

16. Is the “,Problem based learning”, philosophy for the project achieved?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

17. How was the teacher’,s behavior?

6 svarande

rude»0 0%
inattentive»0 0%
friendly»6 100%
other, please comment!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- always helpful» (friendly)

18. Was the teacher available for questions out of classroom?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 83%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

19. What was the difficulty level of homeworks/assignments/projects?

6 svarande

Very easy»0 0%
Quite easy»1 16%
Reasonable»5 83%
Quite difficult»0 0%
Very difficult»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

20. How was the Lab environment to work in?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Quite poor»2 33%
Quite good»3 50%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- measuring appratus was not so good for correct results» (Quite poor)

21. Would you prefer to have the same teacher for some course related to the field of specialization of this teacher?

6 svarande

No, I would not choose such a course»0 0%
Maybe»2 33%
Yes, replace this course with such a course»2 33%
Yes, but keep this course available too.»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- this course provides introduction to the feild but some other advance course along this course will be resasonable » (Yes, but keep this course available too.)

22. Was the teacher successful in maintaining a good learning environment in the classroom?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

23. Did the teacher give you enough time to think about the assigned tasks?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Yes, almost»3 50%
Yes, definitely»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

24. How much learning / understanding did you gain through the 2 sessions of clean room visit?

6 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Some»4 66%
Quite a lot»1 16%
Very much»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- but more visits regarding to the project in the course are required for good understanding» (Very much)

25. Are you able to get a clear idea of the project fabrication process flow at the end of this course ?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Yes, to some extent»5 83%
Yes, definitely»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- more practical approch is required» (Yes, to some extent)

26. Are you able to get the course materials and instructions easily ?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Yes, to some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

27. Are the information or instructions given for the project and literature study clear ?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
Yes, to some extent»4 66%
Yes, definitely»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Summarizing questions

28. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
Good»1 16%
Excellent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- as far as short introduction is concern.» (Excellent)

29. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- course contents»
- sorry but question is not so clear....»
- to use more experienced lecturers and teachers»

30. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- way of project, more practical approch is needed with good measuring appratus»
- nothing »
- - some more mechanical background lessons - adopt tutorials with mechanical tasks»

31. Additional comments

- project groups were big enough, two students per group might have been sufficient. »
- nothing»
- the content of the hole course was too much focused on mems-productions»

Kursutvärderingssystem från