ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced Photonics, MCC105, MPMPE, HT2008, MCC105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-07 - 2009-01-23
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»1 25%
At least 35 hours/week»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- the time is quite flexible» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- We had basically around six lecture in total. It would be better if we had more. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»2 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- no exam» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 75%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- no course literature.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It was offered for the first time. So, it was little bit scattered.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 50%
Very good»2 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»1 25%
I did not seek cooperation»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»2 50%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

14. How do you think the course can be improved until next year?

- I think more guest lecture on different optics research could be included. »

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Same research methodology»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

17. Additional comments

- It was really full of pretty good taste of real time research work. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från