ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Mathematical modelling and computational tools 2008, MVE125

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-05 - 2009-01-31
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Peter Gennemark»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 7%
Around 20 hours/week»4 28%
Around 25 hours/week»6 42%
Around 30 hours/week»2 14%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- because of project but, project was good» (Around 25 hours/week)
- and maybe more but it did not work » (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 30%
100%»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 4.69

- I skiped only one session » (100%)

General

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 30%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 15%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 38%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- The goals should be described/handed out in the first lecture?!» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 63%
No, the goals are set too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»1 9%
To some extent»7 63%
Yes, definitely»2 18%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- The first question was too difficult.» (To some extent)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»4 28%
Very well»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- There would be nice with a red thread in the course, maybe a reoccurring problem that we look at with different tools.» (Rather badly)

Lectures and practicals

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»5 35%
Large extent»5 35%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- One or two lectures trying to dig in a full topic is hard» (Small extent)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»7 50%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I have Klipp"s book, but haven"t read anything. Didn"t find it very relevant. But I would like literature that is more connected to the lectures.» (Small extent)
- The Edda Klipp book is not so use full and really not worth the money since it is so expensive, I bought the book since it was recommended by Bodil » (Small extent)

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 21%
Very good»10 71%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

10. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- i think project should preserved for next year and more work in matlab»
- I don‘,t know»
- The content of the course.»
- The project part»
- Projects, even though I only saw the presentations it seemed like a good way to use the tools we learn»
- Martin Berglund»
- Materials were very good--those can be continued.»
- Martin Berglund was extremely helpful.The projects were good for studying.»

11. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- i think teachers should be limited for course, every lecture is given by different teacher, difficult to study :(»
- I don‘,t know»
- Better literature.»
- The parts about modeling with p calculus software»
- The purely mathematical part was hard to relate to since it wasn"t dealing with biological phenomenons»
- KV Prasad, Devdutt Dubashi»
- There should be smoother transition from topic to topic.»
- It is really better to teach less topics rather than only hints from large number of software , or to copy and paste the instruction from practical protocols (2 practicals were exactly like that )or may be it needs more time in course timetable .»
- KV Prasad and Devdatt Dubhashi were not good in teaching»
- preparation of labs, there were a number of times where the lab leader obviously wasn"t prepared, software not working, no clear goals etc.»

12. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»6 42%
Adequate»3 21%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- The content is good, but a bit unconnected. I think it would be better with fewer subject and more on selected parts, e.g. graph theory and ODEs.» (Adequate)

Project work

Only for students taking part in the project work.

13. To what extent has the supervison been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- peter is very good, he listen to the students and appreciate.» (Great extent)
- Martin is the most helpful person in this course» (Great extent)

14. To what extent has the background material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 30%
Very good»7 70%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I don‘,t know»
- Way of guidance.»
- Martin should be preserved as the project supervisor»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- please make group with less number of people, we observed many problem in large group. meeting problems, lots of different ideas, etc»
- I don‘,t know»
- The outline of the project should be explained in details, and the two projects should be balanced.»
- Number of group members should be reduced.»
- It"s better to do project after doing the course same as GU student ,then we have an over view of course .Also define same level project because I think we had 2 totally different project.»
- The projects should be well balanced»
- Too large group and too large project. Have to make sure that not a single person has to do all the work...»

18. What is your general impression of the project?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»2 20%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- I would prefer single person or at most 2 person project, that wouldn"t change the learning scope nor burden, at least for me..» (Poor)
- The only thing that I can say I did it well in that course with great help of our supervisor.» (Excellent)

Kursutvärderingssystem från