Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power Electronics Solutions for Power Systems, ENM100, MPEPO, HT2008, ENM100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-08 - 2010-02-04
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 25%
Around 20 hours/week»2 16%
Around 25 hours/week»1 8%
Around 30 hours/week»5 41%
At least 35 hours/week»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 8%
75%»3 25%
100%»8 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.58

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 8%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 91%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 36%
Yes, definitely»5 45%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»3 25%
Great extent»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- The most learning has come by self studies.» (Some extent)
- Good and pedagogic teaching» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 33%
Large extent»5 41%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- The main book was simply to expensive.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- They where a great learning factor.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 16%
Very good»10 83%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- extremely well!» (Very good)
- Massimo and Tarik are always happy to help and to answer questions at any time!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»8 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- I didn"t work with any fellow students at all. Which I like in courses like this.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»9 75%
High»2 16%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

- Come on, push me to the limit.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»6 50%
High»5 41%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The other course I was attending was a lot of workload.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 16%
Good»3 25%
Excellent»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 4.41

- High quality lectures with tutorials that where advanced. The computer labs where a very nice way of learning.» (Good)
- recommended it to 1st year friends» (Excellent)
- Really good lectures and computer labs.» (Excellent)
- The duo of Massimo and Tarik should be maintained» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- everything!»
- The computer labs.»
- Nothing should change»
- everything»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more tutorials!»
- More tutorials and more papers with DETAILED information about its content and solutions.»
- - Maybe adding some hours talking about the basis of control theory is good also, especially some theory related to the controller of the computer assignments to help us understand even more.»
- none»
- -More guest lectures -In computer labs, students should be taught more in using PSCAD »

16. Additional comments

- REally good course, gives good understanding.»
- The course is very helpful in preparing power engineers going in to the field. And Massimo so far has proved once more to be a great teacher»

Kursutvärderingssystem från