Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Power Market Management, EEK201, MPEPO, HT2008, EEK201
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-12-08 - 2010-02-04 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 9% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 36% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 27% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 3 | | 27% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.72 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 11 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 5 | | 45% |
100%» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 4.54 - overlap with other course some time» (75%)
- almost» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 27% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 72% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 11 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 27% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 5 | | 45% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - I think it would have been better to have four theory questions and four calculative questions. If you are not able to answer one of three it a big part» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching (lectures and tutorials) been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.27 - Nayeem should be better prepared when he have tutorials. It seemd like he started to think about the tutorial when he came to the class and just looked at solutions. It would also be good with some more explanation when writing on the board» (Some extent)
- I think there is a lot potential with the tutorials. More questions might be helpful.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 45% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 8. To what extent have the worked-out examples been of help for your understanding of the lectures?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 45% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 2.9 9. To what extent has the computer-based project been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - The gams project was of great value, however the teaching method here could be improved. It is disappointing, putting a lot of effort in the program if another group just hands in the presented solution. It should be made clear which material will be avaible at which point of time.» (Great extent)
10. To what extent has the term-paper been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 - Especially the idea of the mini-conference is brilliant. However, it was a very time-consuming task, as the min. 4 pages in IEEE were a high standard.» (Great extent)
- Iam Particularly excited and commend the effort of Tuan.He developed our technical skill in writing in professional journal and conference presentation » (Great extent)
11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?11 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 27% |
Very well» | | 8 | | 72% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72
Study climate12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 18% |
Very good» | | 9 | | 81% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.81 - Questions asked to the tutor could only rarely be answered.» (Rather good)
13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 18% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 81% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.81 14. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 63% |
High» | | 4 | | 36% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.36 15. How was the total workload this study period?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 54% |
High» | | 5 | | 45% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45
Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 9% |
Good» | | 4 | | 36% |
Excellent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 4.45 17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- term paper »
- The mini-conference, the paper and the project.»
- everything»
- everything!»
- term paper and the mini conferance, it was really great! Interesting to hear and very nice that Tuan made such a nice event of it, with a program and coffe in the break»
- Everything»
- -project
-term paper and presentation»
18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- get the composium instead of lectures powerpoints copies.»
- The tutorials.»
- none»
- nothing.»
- better preparation of tutorials. »
- Market game should be given more time»
- -guest lecture should be added
-study visit should be added»
19. Additional comments- Guest lecture can be appreciated»
- Avisit to either the TSO, market operator or generation plant should be included.»
- I have learn interesting knowledge in the course»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|