|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Power Electronic Converters, ENM060, MPEPO, HT2008, ENM060Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-12-08 - 2010-02-04 Antal svar: 24 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - it is ok» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.04 - Some scheduling clashes with other course» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - I didn"t read them. » (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - oups, merked the box by mistake, ignore this answer...» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - examination was set very hard, it was really an strange examination. I worked hard for my examination but when i saw the question paper I was surprised. it was made too much difficult. just it was made complicated » (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.39 - the teacher who was for the tutorials section that unable to give the answers to the asked questions during the class and after the class» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - Course book was poor» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.39 - Late uploads of assignments, numerous updates to items after publishing (check _before_!) etc.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 - Mostly open and helpful» (Rather good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?24 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - Mostly no problems, but some clear "freeloaders", trying to cover their lack of knowledge by tagging along with those that have studied and do know the material.» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 - Too high given what the exam tested - learning equations and derivations by heart rather than focusing on how and why the different things worked, and why they were used.» (Too high) 12. How was the total workload this study period?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - Flexible other course made for acceptable load.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - Exam tested mostly learning equations and derivations by heart, not understanding. Pspice exercises are a good idea, but wait time for help and grading were appalling. Student representatives selected as an afterthought halfway through course, not as regulated at the start. No custom questions for evaluation (I"d like to have seen q"s for how pspice, tutorials, labs and lectures worked)» (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the P-Spice labs and demonstrations»- all the lecturenotes should be uploaded. » - the labs are needed to be preserved» - the trial exams» - there were three teachers for this course some times one was coming and at the other times another. according to me only one teacher should be theory section and one for tutorials» - PSpice laborations» - Using the blackboard and explaining everything slowely and carefully. You did not abuse Power Point!!!» - everything» - The multi-faceted approach (lectures, tutorials, pspice, labs) is in theory good, if conducted properly. Good people. Tutorial handouts.» - The PSpice laborations.» - Trial Exam but without -2 rule.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Since tutorials are very important in this course, then I think we need more example exercises. The book exercises are too complicated.»- the workload should decreased and the course could be more clearer as the operating principles of some components seems very critical they should make more understandable» - the lectures are too simple» - A little more focus on practical transformer design.» - as this is a hard subject according to me teacher should not move very fast and give te basic knowlegde. the way of examination should be changed according to me» - I would have like to had more clear lectures, I had the felling that we were jumping between one topic and another, and it was hard to catch up, for some of us it was the first contact with power electronics, and sometimes it was very hard to follow.» - The PSpice labs. The home assignment were good, but pushing a button just to see that the curves are like in the book does not teach me much.» - as i know from my self from the students the lecturer a little bit fast and it will be good the lecture slides are put in the web two three days before the start of the course.» - Pspice wait time for help/grading was too long. Lab pm unclear (no info on how connections on add-in card looks - guesswork for students!) Student representatives selected at START of course. Bad exam. Tutorials were just going over the handouts - if you do handouts (which is great!!!), refer to them and show how and why you do what you do, don"t just calculate everything again. It"s not a math course!» - Thorbjörn needs to be prepared and should stick to the subject. He knows a lot, that"s obvious, but it gets all messy for us that doesn"t know anything about converter components from the start. We have a hard time trying to understand how the current goes for normal operation, at first. » 16. Additional comments- the teachers are good ,but they should give us some more notes,we can not remember every points that they give us in the lecture by only seeing the pictures,more explanations are needed.»- The demonstration handouts were excellent.» - Thanks for a good course!» - I thought this course was going to be more fun and interesting than it was - the material was still good, but the problems distracted from the learning very much.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12%