ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation TEK285, TEK285

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-25 - 2009-02-31
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Andreas Hagen»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga

1. Attendance on lectures

How many percent of the lectures did you attend?

20 svarande

<25%» 0 0%

25-50%» 2 10%

50-75%» 7 35%

>75%» 11 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Hade en annan kurs som krockade med tillfällena ibland» (50-75%)
- the lectures would be more interesing if it can involve more real case study or practice» (>75%)
- The lectures were pretty good» (>75%)

2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 1 5%

Rather well» 7 35%

Very well» 12 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Course adminstration with hand-outs, instructions, web-portal submits as well as obligatory supervision sessions were greatly appreciated.» (Very well)

3. How demanding was the course?

20 svarande

Not at all demanding» 0 0%

Slightly demanding» 1 5%

Quite demanding» 6 30%

Demanding» 13 65%

Very demanding» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- however, it was at an acceptable level and the course worked out very well.» (Demanding)

4. Did you buy the course book?

20 svarande

yes» 14 70%

no, too expensive» 6 30%

no, other reason» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.3

- Den var väldigt pedagogisk. Hade dock problem med första kapitlet och kommer därför igång sent då jag blev omotiverad att läsa den. Då jag väl kom igång så var den väldigt bra.» (yes)
- Waste of money!» (yes)
- though quite expensive» (yes)

5. How much of the recommended chapters in the book have you read?

20 svarande

0-25%» 1 5%

25-50%» 1 5%

50-75%» 4 20%

75-100%» 14 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- i am not a reader..» (0-25%)
- Everything.» (75-100%)

6. How did you find the book

20 svarande

poorly written» 1 5%

ok» 8 40%

well written» 11 55%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- too many useless words and sentences to explain fast concepts.» (ok)
- It was an OK book, not excellent but it certainly met the demands of the course. The only donwsida of the book was that it occasionally felt as if the same issues were brought up in several chapters withour really contributing through adding value.» (well written)
- sometimes,difficult to understand» (well written)

7. How useful were the lecture notes?

20 svarande

did not use them» 0 0%

useless» 2 10%

somewhat useful» 7 35%

good to have them» 6 30%

very useful» 5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Gärna sett lite mer text till bilderna i alla fall någon kommentar. » (useless)
- I used them a little bit, just to see what"s most important. But, they were not very clear.» (somewhat useful)
- Personally I rarely focus on lecture notes since I experience studying mainly by the book being more contributing.» (somewhat useful)

8. On average, how would you rate the amount of material covered in one lecture?

20 svarande

Boringly little» 0 0%

OK but more could be added» 1 5%

Just about right on average» 12 60%

OK but some material could be removed» 7 35%

Way too much to absorb per lecture» 0 0%

Don» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I believe this is an introductury course on logistics and supply chain management, there should certainly be a whole lot more that could be covered, but I presume that part is available in other courses we are able to take after having completed this one.» (Just about right on average)

9. How did you find the lectures?

20 svarande

very poor» 0 0%

rather poor» 3 15%

rather good» 4 20%

very good» 7 35%

excellent» 6 30%

no comment» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Väldigt röriga föreläsningar. Sedan är fyra timmar i sträck i samma ämne på tok för mycket. Bättre med att dela upp det i två olika lektioner. » (rather poor)
- well prepared and with rich content» (rather good)
- They were good, especially contributing are real-life examples, they make the course more applicable and understandable as well as it increases intrest.» (very good)
- however, the exercises lesson was not so good! The teacher couldn"t explain some solutions that appeared in the powerpoint. » (excellent)

10. How many of recommended exercises did you do?

20 svarande

0-25%» 2 10%

25-50%» 1 5%

50-75%» 4 20%

75-100%» 13 65%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Recommended exercises? The ones in the book or what? There should be a "I don"t know" alternative to fill in.» (0-25%)
- Förstår inte riktigt vilka övningar ni menar. Var det de som skulle lämnas in så har samtliga blivit gjorda .(???)» (75-100%)
- more feedback would be nice» (75-100%)

11. Which parts of the course did you find difficult?

- To work together in such a big group from all over the word (5 ppl, 5 cultures) in the project. I suppose it was good for learning. But one could never attend the meetings, which is frustrating. Also, I feel the result was not very good. But maybe much wasn"t expected from us cause we got a good grade anyway.»
- Projektet kändes lite skumt. Man generar inget själv utan det blev mer eller mindre ett klipp och klistra projekt. Ett sånnt som man gör på gymnasiet.»
- to collaborate within the group in the project»
- tied up capital calculation»
- -»
- the term paper was a little bit to hard to get started into the right direction, but it finally worked out pretty good.»
- Some of the calculations seemed a bit unlogical, but that is a general view of economical calculations as compared to engineering or physics calculations. The problem wasn"t the calculations themselves, it was easy math and quite easy to remember which formula to use were but the book could explain some of the formulas better, or perhaps you could make a document that has the relevant formulas listed.»
- the project took quite a lot of time and at the end not that much time was left to study all those chapters, considering that I was taking another coures too, with an other project to do and stuff to study. »
- production plan as the calculation part.»
- Calculations part, not well described how to proceed with them. Better to show the principles and not long calculations that has to be done in excel.»
- The formulas were a lot, at the beginning I thought we must know all of them by head, I was not sure if I will manage to remember them»
- None, all the parts had an appropriate level. »

12. What about the availability of the teacher if you needed help?

20 svarande

Very good» 10 50%

Good» 5 25%

OK» 1 5%

Bad» 0 0%

Very bad» 0 0%

I did not seek help» 4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- Supervision sessions was greatly appreciated.» (Very good)
- However, I felt that the teacher at the exercise when the calculations were handled wasn"t well prepared. E.g. he had made an error (forgot about the tied-up-capital due to safety stock), which is ok, but he didn"t recognize he was wrong and just told us to "calculate this way on the exam and you will pass" without explaining why. The exercise should be more about understanding and not just about calculating without thinking. But I"m sure it will turn out this way if only the teacher is a bit more prepared. Otherwise I think the teaching was very good, all the way from lecturers and tutoring to the beer game. Good job! » (Good)

13. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?

19 svarande

poor» 1 5%

fair» 2 10%

adequate» 1 5%

good» 10 52%

excellent» 5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I asked for some explanation about my grade, without being answered » (poor)
- The difficulty level of the exam could have been increased, especially the calculations could have been made more demanding, however, one of the calculations took way, way too long an time. It was not difficult but was extremely time consuming, not OK. It is OK if an exam is demanding but it is not justified to make an task so time consuming when it is not more difficult than it was.» (adequate)
- Yeah, sure.» (good)
- but seems not all the chapters are contained in the exam.» (good)
- Questions should be made in a way that cover more than just one topic. » (good)

14. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor» 2 10%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 10%

Good» 10 50%

Excellent» 6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- I am satisfied, but not overwhelmed.» (Good)

15. Other comments/suggestions for how the course can be improved?

- Not really, just improved calculation exercise, as mentioned earlier. It is a good balance othwerise between reading, calculations, project, beer game and so on. »
- the calculation of the exercise should be improved, the exercises lecture is bad.»
- Se över föreläsningarna för de var inte bra, väldigt opedagogiska. Behåll boken och följ den lite bättre på föreläsningarna. »
- no, i think i leart a lot from this course, thanks very much!»
- Exercises should be prepared by the teacher. I got the impression that the teacher was overstrained with the exercises or just not well prepared!»
- Would appreciate more examples from the construction industry.»
- give more explanations about the group activity. How it should be done, how the presentation should be carried on and other suggestions like this. »
- the calculation lecture is bad. we need correct answer and good teacher as well»
- Students studied very hard and the exam seemed fair but there was very few who got grade 5. May be strictness in making was too high»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.6

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.6
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från