Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

CSE2009, TME080

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-18 - 2008-11-20
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Peter Hansbo»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 14%
Around 20 hours/week»11 52%
Around 25 hours/week»5 23%
Around 30 hours/week»2 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The time required to get through the course was good, provided one does not have debugging problems with their matlab code.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 4%
75%»4 19%
100%»16 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

- all the lectures but not all the computer sessions..» (50%)
- The teaching was sometimes too fast, but otherwise good.» (100%)
- Missing the examples given in class is particularly hazardous.» (100%)
- I just missed one lecture» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 80%
No, the goals are set too high»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- but please consider that some students are not familiar with programing and it can be hard to adopt with class soon.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- I obtained a thorough understanding of the basics behind the FVM and FEM, but everything else was covered too quickly» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»9 42%
Yes, definitely»12 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Together with thw assignments it did.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»8 38%
Large extent»11 52%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- This is a reflection of my learning style and not the lecturers ability.» (Small extent)
- Mostly during computer assignments.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»9 42%
Large extent»10 47%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- The course literature was great for the FVM and the procedures discussed after the FEM, but for the FEM I relied on external textbooks.» (Some extent)
- Good and brief course book.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»16 76%
Very well»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 9%
Rather good»4 19%
Very good»14 66%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- I was impressed at the speed with which Peter could leave the room after a lecture. However, I only sort help during lab times where Peter and his assistant were very helpful and quick, especially considering the number of students in the class.» (Very good)
- peter always left very fast after the lecture, could maybee stay to give more students opportunities to ask questions. » (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 14%
Rather well»4 19%
Very well»13 61%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- The general student study areas are good for finding extra help.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»11 52%
High»9 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- I spent plenty of nights writing matlab code, but over all the workload was quite good.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 42%
High»11 52%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- I was always busy but never panicked.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»7 33%
Good»12 57%
Excellent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- I felt the later parts of the course were a waste of time.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The computer assignments»
- Emphasis on FVM and FEM»
- Computer assignments were of great help in both getting the students hands warm for the next courses as well as obtaining an overview about what is going to be done in the next periods.»
- the labs are good»
- Computer assignments»
- The computer exercises»
- this procedure is good but assignment takes all of our time and can not study enough during the quarter»
- the lab assignments»
- The assigments should be preserved. Good that you have to do it alone to really understand.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The questions. Theones from the last years book was impossible to undetrstand.»
- The FEM is much more difficult to understand than the FVM. I would prefer to have had a 1D FEM exercise instead of the 1D FEV exercise (reordered of course).»
- The course literature was well written but it lacked consistency in many parts which can be improved to next year. »
- more problems to solve, maybee some problem solving sessions. The teatcher has to slow down, it"s inpossinle to learn anything from the lectures.»
- One more lecture per week so more examples can be discussed. »
- Better learning outcomes for the course!!»
- It would be better if the lectures on time-stepping and non-linear systems were clearer since this is the hardest part of the course. More excersices (not only computer assignments) during the course would make the learning easier.»
- more examples on the last parts, and also solutions to the exercises. and some more excercises. »
- Student should know that all the assignement are done with Matlab. It should be written in the prerequisites.»
- nothing change»
- there should be some problem solving session.»

16. Additional comments

- The course is intresting but the tempo is to high.. there is no time for understaning anything.»
- The right answers to the assignments in the book would be much appreciated.»
- the speed of the lectures is high. Peter should slow it down.»

17. How do you grade the general quality of the lecture notes?*

21 svarande

Excellent»2 9%
Good»8 38%
Ok»9 42%
Not good enough»2 9%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.52 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- more exercises and solutions to the existing ones. » (Good)
- yes» (Not good enough)

18. Did you get enough help with computer exercises from the exercise teacher?*

- Yes»
- Definitely»
- yes»
- Yes»
- Yes, definitely enough.»
- Yes, very good»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- yes»
- yes»
- Yes»
- Yes.»
- yes definitely. Thanks»
- yes»
- Yes»
- pretty much»
- Yes»
- Yes»

19. What could be improved with the tasks?

- The FEM is much more difficult to understand than the FVM. I would prefer to have had a 1D FEM exercise instead of the 1D FEV exercise (reordered of course).»
- nothing, I think, they wer really good.. Maybee it would be nice if one of the time integration schemes was included. Or one of the iteration mettods. »
- To simple problems. »
- Some small lab with a non-linear/transient analysis could help make those areas less abstract.»
- Några av uppgifterna hade kunnat formulerats lite tydligare.»
- yes»
- I have no idea. but if assignment explain somehow that we can underestand thier relation to other course like CFD and so on could be better»

20. How do you grade the tasks with respect to your learning progress, creating interest and general quality?*

21 svarande

Excellent»4 19%
Good»9 42%
Ok»8 38%
Not good enough»0 0%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.19 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was not until preparing for the exam that I really came to terms with the FEM. Hence why I have suggested more of a focus on it in the tasks.» (Good)
- I wish i have enough time to study the material on time for doing tasks» (Good)

21. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?*

- Yes»
- Yes»
- yes,exactly»
- Yes»
- Yes, I think so.»
- yes. Absolutely. The most part was from the labs, which was the biggest part of the course.»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- We have not taken the exam yet»
- Yes»
- yes»
- yes»
- Yes»
- Yes, but it could be better with more practical examples in the course (how works this method, this formula...).»
- yes completely»
- no»
- Yes»
- yes it was fair.»
- Yes»
- Yes»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.35

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.35
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.33

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från