|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Advanced material mechanics TME150, TME150Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-11-17 - 2008-12-01 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80% Kontaktperson: Kenneth Runesson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - The main part of these hours were spent on the computer assignments.» (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - Some lectures collided with my other course» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.87 - If you have taken the first course, which most people did.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - It was good that the questions was not exactly like those handed out.» (Yes, definitely) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching in class been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Too fast, too difficult. » (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 8. To what extent have the computer assignments been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Actually there werent time for anything else..» (Large extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - The handouts came late, otherwise good course admin» (Rather badly) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.87 - Both Kenneth and Magnus were gone during the examination week and it is then most questions arise. Try to avoid this next year.» (Rather poor) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.87 12. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - too high at the end due to late hand out of the questions.» (High) 13. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - The assignment took all avalible time» (Too high) Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - I would have gained more knowledge of the subject if the excercices were handed sooner and less time spent on assignments.» (Fair) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The assignments is a very good way to learn the course content. But alot of time were spent on trying to find errors in some code and the must be avoided.»- Three computer assignments are good for learning the course and should definitely be preserved to next year. » - That the exam questions was not exactly as those handed out.» - The course material is good and "easy" to understand/follow. With corrections and maybe some examples it will be even better. » 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The workload must be lesser. Perhaps focus the lectures on some importent part and make sure that everybody catches the main parts. Perhaps skip the OH-slides because it is hard to follow, or at least make the number of slides smaller.»- I guess it is a good idea that this course be in the second quarter especially after the course "Computational Nonlinear Mechanics". Very topics were unclear and we just used them in the Matlab codes to get the answer, but nonlinear modeling, polar decomposition, objectivity, first/second piola kirchhoff stress and many other issues were very unclear at that time, and we are realizing now that "computational nonlinear mechanics" should be a pre-requisite for the "advanced material mechanics" course. » - Hand out the questions to each chapter along the course. Not all at the end.» - Assignments.» - The time consuming CA"s» 17. Additional comments- My only complaint is about the lack of help during the exam week.»- It would have been easier to do the assignments if we had had better fellow-charts for programming that at least described the algorithm well for us. » Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.92
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%