Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Power system analysis, ENM050, MPEPO, H08, ENM050

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-10 - 2008-11-13
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 9%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»4 36%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 18%
75%»2 18%
100%»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 18%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 66%
No, the goals are set too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- I think it"s a good thing too set the goals as high as possible but may be an extra week is needed to be able to cope with everything!» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»2 22%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»3 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.55


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching (lectures and tutorials) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The teacher"s accent was difficult to understand. But tutorials were conducted very well.» (Some extent)
- There were too much and long problems in the tutorial, we did not have enough time to solve them completely at class» (Some extent)
- Large extent from the tutorials, only attended like 4 lectures but thought it was no point in going.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- Course compendium is good» (Large extent)

8. To what extent have the worked-out examples been of help for your understanding of the lectures?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- The problems saw on the lectures were too simple compared to the exam, and the tutorial problems, they surely helped understand, but when I tried to solve tutorial problems by myself the level of difficulty was definitely different.» (Some extent)

9. To what extent has the practical laboratory demonstration been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- Because I already knew them.» (Small extent)
- It was very interesting» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the computer-based design project been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- IT IS USEFUL» (Large extent)
- Very nice project and very helpful project advisor.» (Great extent)
- The project was very time consuming, anyway it was really good working at it, very illustrative.» (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»6 54%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»2 18%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 9%
Very well»8 72%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

14. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»5 45%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Slightly high» (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»5 45%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Very good tutorials, good project but it 5 pers in a group is to many, 2 or 3 would have been better.»
- projet design»
- The project was very innovative and contained most thing we had to know. It helped me alot to have a better understanding of the issues.»
- everything»
- the computer based project»
- Laboratory demonstration»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- before the demostration lab some previous report should be handed in in order to take a better advantage of this. »
- Defenitely? Nothing.»
- i don"t mention any for definite change»
- May be tutorial problems, instead of having problems with too much matrixes, complex equation solving, and matrix inversion, etc..We can have more representative problems, instead of trying to solve the matrix, we can discuss the goal of the problem, see what is happening in the network, I mean we can let the computers solve the equations and we can focus on discussing the results, to be able to determine whether they are wrong, or right, expected or not etc..»
- A trial exam should be introduced and »
- The English accent of the teacher !»

19. Additional comments

- if possible, there should be a trial examen in the middle of the period.»
- Not defenitely but I wish I could have a teacher with better English accent.»
- the workload should be decreased....as for starting as new master"s student its set high where we have to take time to settle with accomodation and environment»
- I think the exam was too long, I was not expecting to invert the Jacobean matrix, nor two iterations, also the theoretical questions were quite hard understand and to answer as well.»
- lectures should include more diagrams and simulations for better understanding.»
- I believe the 4 study period system is not efficient for good learning, understanding & critical thinking !»

Kursutvärderingssystem från