Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Kursutvärdering Phase Transformations2008, MMK161

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-07 - 2008-11-12
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Maria Knutson Wedel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»2 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Fair amount of work» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 25%
100%»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

- Maria is a great teacher-I would not like to miss any of her lectures!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»4 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Maria is a great teacher-she is highly skilled, helpful and pedagogical!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- You could get all the help you wanted! » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»3 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 50%
Adequate»1 25%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I only took this course» (Low)
- i had to put down a lot of effort in the other course i read parallel to Phase Transformations» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Best course I"v ever had since it is the luxuriously private course!» (Excellent)
- Maria made it very interesting!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lecture contents should be preserved because it gives a clear view into the phase transformation.»
- everything»
- The ThermoCalc and the poster should be kept as it made the course more interesting. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The ThermoCalc assignment is really time consuming without the correct database.»
- It would be good to have access to the correct databases in the ThermoCalc assignment in order to better learn the program.»
- I think graphs or figures that are not in the textbook can be used to illustrate some abstract principles such as diffusional growing etc, as we can read the graphs or figures in the textbook and other images can provide us a different viewpoint of the concept. »

16. Additional comments

- If some fore-courses describing crystal structures and dislocation movements and reactions are given, we probably could get better understanding of some specific chapters.»
- Some short questions can be given frequently to let the students know their progress. »

17. Did you find the project done in ThermoCalc contributing to your learning

Please add suggestions on how to improve the project

- Yes, it did contribute to our learning. But I guess it came a little bit earlier than it should. Moreover, the database seemed problematic.»
- By accessing the correct databases! However it was nice that we actually did an assignment for a company»
- Unfortunately we cannot use the database required for the project, otherwise I think we can learn more for the ThermoCalc project. More background can be given about ThermoCalc, better with some examples that covered in the class. »
- No. It was poorly administrated since the proper database wasn"t installed. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från