ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Internal Combustion Engines, MTF240

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-03 - 2008-11-14
Antal svar: 32
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Sven Andersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

32 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 21%
Around 20 hours/week»10 31%
Around 25 hours/week»11 34%
Around 30 hours/week»3 9%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Would have liked to spend more!» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

32 svarande

0%»1 3%
25%»1 3%
50%»1 3%
75%»10 31%
100%»19 59%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- mycket schemakrockar» (25%)
- Good Teaching!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

32 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»23 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

30 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»29 96%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.03

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

31 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 9%
Yes, definitely»25 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 9%

Genomsnitt: 3

- A very typical exam» (Yes, definitely)
- Exam questions were really well prepared. These questions assessed whether the student understood the logic underlying the subject. Almost no questions could be answered by "only memorizing" the course material which I appreciate!» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»3 9%
Large extent»19 59%
Great extent»9 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

7. What did you think about the different lecturers/teachers?

Matrisfråga

- very bad teaching skills regarding Raul, it"s the exercise leaders task to solve the exercises on the black board not the students.»
- Rauls sätt att ta upp elever till tavlan för att lösa tal de aldrig sett och sen få dem att känna sig som idioter är kanske inte helt optimalt. Övningarna var i övrigt förvirrade och oklara.»
- The only thing that I can critisize about Lucien Koopmans" lecture is that he showed everything in a very small period of time (everything went very fast), but this is not his fault.»
- Sven is a great teacher.»

Sven Andersson
32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»1 3%
Good»3 9%
Very good»28 87%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.84

Lucien Koopmans (gas exchange)
32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»11 34%
Very good»21 65%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.65

Raul Lima Ochoterena
31 svarande

Very poor»15 48%
Poor»6 19%
OK»4 12%
Good»4 12%
Very good»2 6%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.09

Alf Hugo Magnusson
32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»4 14%
OK»10 37%
Good»7 25%
Very good»6 22%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 3.55

8. What did you think about the exercises/assignments/lab?

Matrisfråga

- Assignment 1: wrong input data, made it very hard to understand the heat release. Didn"t learn anything. Problem exercises: The problems were good, but the teaching not.»
- Assignment 1 needs to be more specified»
- Wrong compression ratio put many of us in a trouble in the first assignment, however it was very useful about learning how heat release rate could be handled.»
- Buy more and better tools for the dismantling!!»

Problem exercises
31 svarande

Very poor»2 6%
Poor»3 10%
OK»11 37%
Good»7 24%
Very good»6 20%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.41

Assignment 1 (heat release)
32 svarande

Very poor»2 6%
Poor»1 3%
OK»13 41%
Good»11 35%
Very good»4 12%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.45

Assignment 2 (engine map)
32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»5 16%
Good»13 41%
Very good»13 41%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 4.25

Lab (dismantling)
32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»1 3%
Good»6 19%
Very good»24 77%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 4.74

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

32 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 18%
Large extent»16 50%
Great extent»10 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Heywood is a very good book and it had all the answers.» (Great extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

32 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Rather well»21 65%
Very well»10 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- not much notes, as everything we need is in the literature.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

32 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 18%
Very good»26 81%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Sven and Alf were often available» (Very good)
- Sven always took time to answer questions! Very good!» (Very good)
- The accessibility of Sven is a very big bonus.» (Very good)
- Fick mycket hjälp av Alf Hugo. Väldigt bra!» (Very good)
- This was really perfect, I could get a lot of help inside the class and even outside the class.» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

32 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 9%
Rather well»8 25%
Very well»19 59%
I did not seek cooperation»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- I was alone in the first assignment. For the second assignment, I could not get enough help from my groupmate.» (Rather poorly)
- Hard to find times that matched our schedules» (Rather poorly)
- Exchange students are easy to work with» (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

32 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»18 56%
High»13 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Eftersom jag arbetatde samtidigt som jag läste kursen var arbetsbelastningen hög. Framför allt labbarna tog mycket tid jämfört mot vad dem gav. » (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

32 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»13 40%
High»13 40%
Too high»4 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Due to a lot of other stresses» (High)
- To many assignments!» (High)
- Kan inte ge nåt bra svar eftersom jag bara läste denna kurs samtidigt som jag arbetade.» (High)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

32 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»1 3%
Good»20 62%
Excellent»10 31%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

- Labbarna tog mycket tid och gav lite kunskap. Hade denna tid använts till att föreläsa och läsa på kring dessa områden hade man lärt sig mer tror jag.» (Good)
- Very interseting course with good teachers!» (Excellent)
- Very interesting introduction course that was adequate detailed and reasonable "overviewing" at the same time.» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Dismantling exercise.»
- The lectures given by Lucien and all the parts related to combustion»
- Assignment 2 and the dismantle lab»
- Everything was really good and well presented so no comments...»
- cinnamon buns and coffe»
- Heywood, the lab(dismantling), assignment 2, the midterm and all the lectures.»
- Föreläsningarna»
- dismantling»
- -»
- Almost everything»
- The dismantling»
- Assigment topics, examination strategy, friendly approach to the students and helping them inside and outside the class (I am sure that those will be preserved)»
- assignments, dismantling lab»
- Everything except the stuff that I think should be changed.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- who teach the lecture for excise for mid term should be improved»
- Clearer instructions for the assignments.»
- Assignment 1 should be more clearer what the purpose with tha task is!»
- The first assignment. Not the derivation of the heat release but the part about the Matlab code.»
- the exercise leader»
- The problem lectures with Raul, a different approch is needed. Indata to assingment 1!»
- Labbarna är jag skeptisk till. Både rapport och powerpoint presentation kräver mycket förberedelse.»
- -»
- The counting excersizes»
- Try to specifiy the assignments a little bit better. A lot of unecessary questions would have been avoided.»
- Time alloted to Lucien Koopmans" lecture should be increased if possible (to digest the topics covered in that course).»
- The timing of excersises: We didn"t get the problems from the web and we were supposed to do them in advance (indirect message from Raoul). I suggest that the excersises are a bit delayed (one week?) and the mid-term exam delayed as well. »
- The teacher for the calculation problems, Raul, was not good. It seems somehow that he"s not very competent, it just doesn"t feel that serious. I also think some of his solutions to the problems were wrong. For the course to be more serious next year this has to be changed. Also, the MATLAB program for exercise 1 did not work properly, which wasn"t that great. Another thing that I noticed was that the lectures often were shorter than they were supposed to. Whether this is good or not is up to each person, but some people might not like it.»

18. Additional comments

- should have like a spare help hours for midterm exam»
- I would like to see (or touch) more engines (maybe a longer distmantling lab)»
- Sven och Lucien var inspererande och jag tyckte man lärde sig mest under föreläsningarna. Bra med ett papper på vad som skulle läsas i kurslitteraturen.»
- -»
- Perfect course for learning the basics of ICE.»
- Good to have the mid-term done beforehand, so one could concentrate on the theory.»
- More laborations would have been fun. Very interesting course, I will continue with the advanced ICE course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från