Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Sven Tafvelin, EDA386
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-10-30 - 2008-11-14 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Sven Tafvelin» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 20% |
50%» | | 1 | | 20% |
75%» | | 3 | | 60% |
100%» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - Large overlap with course "Computer Graphics".» (25%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 20% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 2 | | 40% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 40% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - To define a course as "the whole course book and the additional papers" is in my view to vague. At least some guidelines on what to focus a bit more on is needed.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 2 | | 66% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 25% |
To some extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Yes, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.75
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 7. When did you receive the course book?5 svarande
I didn"t buy the course book» | | 1 | | 20% |
I got the course book very late (week 4 or later)» | | 0 | | 0% |
I got the course book week 2 or 3» | | 1 | | 20% |
I got the course book already the first week» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 40% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 10. Would it have been an advantage to you if there had been a programming rehersal/course?There were a number of students that had problems with the programming in lab 1. What would you have preferred?5 svarande
I would have attended a one week course in Java.» | | 1 | | 20% |
I would have preferred to have 2x2 hours rehersal of Java.» | | 1 | | 20% |
I don"t need extra programming teaching.» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4
Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 60% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 80% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 13. How was the course workload?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 50% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4 14. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
High» | | 2 | | 40% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8
Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 20% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
Good» | | 2 | | 40% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Mycket i kursen överlappade med datorkommunikations-kursen.» (Adequate)
16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the internet technology course covers a lot of material which in my estimation should be divided into 2 study periods. It was very hard to understand the whole material in depth during a 7 week study period.»
- More concise goals.»
18. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|