Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road vehicle aerodynamics advanced, TME175

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-30 - 2008-11-15
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 90%
Kontaktperson: Peter Gullberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»0 0%
Around 15 hours/week»3 33%
Around 20 hours/week»4 44%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
At least 30 hours/week»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 22%
100%»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- Missed one or two because of thesis work» (75%)
- Missed a class because of two courses were at the same time.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»7 77%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The tutorials ANSA, Fluid etc were good.» (Large extent)
- Then I mean the tutorials» (Large extent)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts, contact with supervisors etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 11%
Rather well»7 77%
Very well»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Could have been more information on the homepage. » (Rather badly)
- The contact with the supervisors worked very well, they were always very helpful. The homepage though worked very badly, I would have appreciated much more information there.» (Rather well)
- I think it should have been more meatings with the supervisors. » (Rather well)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- The supervisors could almost always give instant help and advise.» (Rather good)
- But, there should also have been schedule time for asking questions » (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 11%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»7 77%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- It was good to choose yourself who to wrk with.» (Very well)

9. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 88%
High»1 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Summarizing questions

10. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- Interesting to have an introduction to CFD and some of the programs that are used. There could have been some more lectures and perhaps also some computer lectures.» (Good)

11. What is your impression of the lectures?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 11%
Adequate»4 44%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I would have appreciated a little more detailed introduction about the project work. At the start of the project it was not very clear what was expected from the group to do. » (Adequate)

12. How would you rate the project work?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»8 88%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- It is really good to have the opportunity to learn the CFD process.» (Good)

13. What did you think about the project layout?

How would you rate the project layout with pre-study, wind tunnel laboration, report and presentation?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»6 66%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- Very good!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course itself!»
- The free thinking of the project.»
- Everything»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lectures on pure theory can be shortened to give more practical info»
- More lectures of the programs. »
- Make the presentations during the exam week.»

16. Additional comments

- Each group can do one or two models specific only to that group - but it should be identified a bit early maybe so that they can focus more and not just work on random models as when they think of it.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från