ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MMA160 Computational hydrodynamics and optimisation, MMA160

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-27 - 2012-06-14
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 86%
Kontaktperson: Carl-Erik Janson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 7%
Around 20 hours/week»8 61%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 69%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- I weas a bit confused about the assignments.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»4 30%
Yes, definitely»8 61%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

5. Was it possible to understand the topic for the individual report?

1 - No, not at all
5 - Yes, very easy to understand

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 23%
3»7 53%
4»3 23%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The topic was easy to understand, but the existing litterature didn"t cover applying the methods on ships, especially in the case for the RANS part. » (2)

6. Suggest how to improve the topic for the individual report.

- clarify on the model scale hull»
- The topic is good, you can answer the questions with different teoretical depth and understanding, and I guess that is how you can use it for setting the grades. To sum up, I think it is a good way for examination in this course.»
- It should be more clear: we just have to answer the questions or we have to do a course summary?»
- Specify more how detailed it should be.»

7. What did you think of the examination seminar?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 15%
4»7 53%
5»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- I regret that I didn"t arrived more prepared to do a good oral presentation.I thought I knew the theories and could present them easily, but it was harder than expected. » (4)
- Could be interesting to give an opportunity to each student to talk about the 3 parts» (4)

Potential flow

8. How many of the lectures did you attend?

13 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»2 15%
80-100%»11 84%

Genomsnitt: 4.84

9. What is your general opinion of the potential-flow part of the course?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

12 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 25%
4»8 66%
5»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- As we said in the mid course evaluation, it may be better to start from the global picture, the practical use and then move to the detail with assumptions, calculations... This was then well done in the other lectures» (3)
- Course material could be much more improved» (4)

10. What did you think of the lectures?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 30%
4»8 61%
5»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- difficult to connect theory with assignment» (4)

11. What did you think of Assignment 1?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 15%
3»2 15%
4»7 53%
5»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

- Problem of data, 2 updates of the subject for correction that made us loose lot of time» (2)

12. Was it a good combination of lectures and assignment work?

1 - Too little time for the assignment
5 - Too much time for the assignment

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 15%
3»5 38%
4»5 38%
5»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

13. What did you think of the litterature?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

12 svarande

1»1 8%
2»0 0%
3»5 41%
4»4 33%
5»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Didn"t buy the book, too expensive..» (3)

14. What is in your opinion the best part of the potential-flow part of the course?

- The assignments»
- Panalization of the bulb.»
- working with shipflow and the assignment was intressting there have been troubles with the software licenses»
- To write about it in the individual report»

15. What improvements can be made to the potential-flow part of the course?

- Course literature and theory connected to assignment»
- Make sure the students understand how the singularities are summed up to resolve the flow, I think that was the hardest thing to understand.»
- I guess it is already well organized.»
- The mathematical part has been quite difficult to get into I had difficulties to understand »
- The lectures were a bit difficult to follow. There was a lot of equations...»

Viscous flow

16. How many of the lectures did you attend?

13 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»2 15%
80-100%»11 84%

Genomsnitt: 4.84

17. What is your general opinion of the viscous part of the course?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 15%
3»2 15%
4»9 69%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- The ondly literature available is the book of introduction to computer fluid dynamics. It will be great to be provided with some additional literature like in potential flow. The slides are difficult to understand on their own. » (2)

18. What did you think of the lectures?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 15%
3»3 23%
4»7 53%
5»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Difficult to connect theory with assignment» (3)

19. What did you think of the assignments?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 15%
3»3 23%
4»8 61%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

20. Was it a good combination of lectures and assignment work?

1 - Too little time for the assignments
5 - Too much time for the assignments

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»8 61%
4»4 30%
5»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

21. What did you think of the litterature?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

11 svarande

1»2 18%
2»2 18%
3»3 27%
4»3 27%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- How do you motivate one to purchase a book for over 500 SEK and you are only using it for a third of the course???» (1)

22. What is in your opinion the best of the viscous flow part?

- The assignment!»
- The lectures »
- I m clealy understand the viscous flow part still trying.»
- the fluent assignment was very interresting, the assignment feedback was good to have»
- To write about it in the individual report»

23. What improvements can be made to the viscous part of the course?

- The literature»
- Give introductions and an overview what we shall learn from the assignments before we start them. »
- Wake distribution of the hull should be more clear»

Optimisation

24. How many of the lectures did you attend?

13 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»2 15%
80-100%»11 84%

Genomsnitt: 4.84

25. What is your general opinion of the optimisation part of the course?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 23%
4»4 30%
5»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

26. What did you think of the lectures?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 30%
4»3 23%
5»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- Difficult to connect theory with assignment, lectures should have been more directed/designated towards assignment » (3)
- Good structured» (5)

27. What did you think of Tutorial 1 (Six-Hump-Camel-Back)?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 23%
4»4 30%
5»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- Problem with the starting files» (3)
- ...when it worked :-)» (5)

28. Whar did you think of Assignment 5?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 7%
3»0 0%
4»5 38%
5»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

29. Was it a good combination of lectures and assignment work?

1 - Too little time for the assignment
5 - Too much time for the assignment

13 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»10 76%
4»1 7%
5»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

30. What did you think of the litterature?

1 - Bad
5 - Good

12 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 33%
4»4 33%
5»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Gave good explanation of the different methods» (3)

31. What is in your opinion the best of the optinisation part of the course?

- The assignment»
- I learnt a lot from the assignments»
- Genetetic Algorithm»
- Tutorial 1»

32. What improvements can be made to the optimisation part of the course?

- Direct the theory towards the assignment»
- The software licenses..»
- More specific explanation is better.»

Study climate

33. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 46%
Very good»7 53%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

34. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 30%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

35. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 76%
High»3 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

36. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 76%
High»2 15%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

Summarizing questions

37. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 61%
Very well»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

38. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»3 23%
Good»8 61%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

39. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The optimisation part»
- The repartition between course and assignment»
- Well installed software.»

40. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing»
- Just be more careful with the starting files for the assignment. »
- lecture note should be less and more accurate.»

41. Additional comments

- Thanks for a good course!»
- Nothing.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från