|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Environmental aspects on logistics and transportation, ITR361Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-11-03 - 2008-11-25 Antal svar: 33 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44% Kontaktperson: Sönke Behrends» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 - Good planning from Sönke and Magnus with an even workload during the whole course.» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how labour-intesive was the course?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - It may differ with other students, as I was intending to findout a reallife application and answers for my practical life, not just to attend the course for good grades.
In some parts of world things work differently and one should have a global view.» (very little) 3. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how difficult was the course?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - depends on which difficulty you speak of:
- understanding : easy
- grading: we don"t know!» (?) 4. How much of the teaching offered did you attend?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.37 - Many guest lectures were very poor.» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.5. How understandable are the course goals?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - I don"t remember them b/c I don"t care much about them.» (?) 6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.96 - taking the general goal is managing the basis of <course title>» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?31 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - No exam on this course» (?) Course lectures and course administrationThis section deals with the lectures given by Magnus Blinge and the course administration. The guest lectures are covered in the following section.8. To what extent have the course lectures (by Magnus Blinge) been of help for your learning?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Blinge lecture slides were very informative and good help for hand-ins» (Large extent) 9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.84 - Articles were often too specific, too detailed, i.e. not so relevant in our fast-changing industrial environment» (Some extent) 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.09 - Slow with updates» (Very poor) 11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - Sönke was probably overwhelmed by his work load...» (Rather good) 12. How do you judge the lectures by Magnus Blinge?MatrisfrågaHow was his competence in the topic?
Genomsnitt: 4.28 How was the his committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.93 13. How do you judge the course assistance by Sönke Behrends?Matrisfråga- Could have been faster with updating the course webpage» How was his competence in the topic?
Genomsnitt: 4.03 How was the his committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 4.12 Guest lecturesThis section deals with the guest lecture. The first question is about the guest lectures in general. After that follow questions focusing on each guest lecture.14. To what extent have the the guest lectures in general been of help for your learning?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - But still interesting.» (small extent) 15. Sten Karlsson (Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers) - What is the greenhouse effect?Matrisfråga- this was to specific for the course. I suggest that next year you should invite maybe Göran Berndes, Christian Azar or someone in charge of the course in sustainable development instead.» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 2.83 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 3.93 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.73 16. Johan Trouve (Schenker) - Environmental strategies from a haulier perspectiveMatrisfrågaHow relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 3.9 How was the lecturer
Genomsnitt: 4.06 How was the lecturer
Genomsnitt: 4.17 17. Maria Björklund (Linköping University) - Environmental perspectives on purchasing of logistics servicesMatrisfråga- Didn"t really tackle the announced subject.
Not convincing at all...» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 3.56 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 3.43 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.7 18. Maria Huge-Brodin (Linköping University) - Environmental SCM and reverse logisticsMatrisfråga- Not convincing at all...» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 3.65 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 3.58 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.82 19. Karl-Henrik Robert (The Natural Step) - An environmental management philosophy based on natural scienceMatrisfråga- Very good!» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 4.38 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 4.64 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 4.48 20. Mohammed Belhaj (IVL) - Environmental economics in the transport sectorMatrisfråga- not clear at all, deceiving» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 3.53 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 3.5 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.4 21. Gunnar Falkenmark (Gothenburg University) - Lobbyism and political aspects in infrastructure investmentsMatrisfråga- Great!» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 3.85 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 4 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.96 22. Elisabeth Hörnfeldt (Scania) - Environmental strategies from a vehicle manufacturerMatrisfråga- I thought she was good, even if people tried to ask her tricky questions that was hard to answer, she sorted it out excellent.» How relevant was the lecture"s topic for the course?
Genomsnitt: 3.87 How was the lecturer"s competence in this topic?
Genomsnitt: 3.83 How was the lecturer"s committment and interest?
Genomsnitt: 3.9 23. On which topic (related to the course content) would you have wished to get a guest lecture by an external expert?- Christian Azar.»- Feasibility/Reliability of the latest technologies» - Political lobbyism, green house effects, manufacturing organization and environment etc» - which company has actually implemented the whole sustainability concept, and what problems were faced by the company and how they have overcome» - i would prefer to have a lecture more logistics oriented, like "trends in green logistics". Nowadays focus - detailed.» - I really hope we had a lecturer on the maritime side of logistics. I believe there should at least be two guest lectures into that field.» - No preferences.» Examination reportsThis section deals with the examination reports. First, questions on the examination reports in general are stated, followed by questions for each examination report.24. How well are the examination reports in general for achieving the course objectives?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - They force students to dig into the subject, but not to have a clear overview of it.» (rather good) 25. How was the workload for the examination reports in general?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - proper and reasonable» (okay) 26. How well did the administration, handouts, handins, correction etc work?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - Too slow with giving the results. The results should have been given no later than two weeks after handin» (very poor) 27. Examination report 1 - Environmental impactsMatrisfråga- Perhaps too much repetitive with respect to the lecture» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 4.09 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.69 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.87 28. Examination report 2 - Transport modes, technical solutionsMatrisfråga- Too few material on the technical improvements
(I take "Very good" as "Very much" i.e. "Very bad"...)» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 4 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.62 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.16 29. Examination report 3 - Environmental logistics, SCMMatrisfråga- Repetitive with respect to technical improvements.
but good holistic view!» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 4.12 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.74 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.61 30. Examination report 4 - Environmental tools and conceptsMatrisfrågaHow relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 3.8 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.61 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.2 31. Examination report 5 - Environmental economics & political aspectsMatrisfrågaHow relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 3.87 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.75 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.6 32. Examination report 6 - Final reportMatrisfråga- Excellent Report !» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 4.21 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.84 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 3.84 33. What do you think was the best with the examination reports?- They cover all important aspects.»- No four-hour exam, possibility to do research on your own, interesting subjects» - one was force to "get it" and not just memorise for the exam» - We were forced to dig into all parts of the course» - Forced one to think about all possible aspects» - Last one» - Continuous study helps us to understand the concept better. » - It covers a larger part than an exam would have.» - 3rd one» - Final report was the best - wlear stated task and interesting assigbmenet (broad area to think about, limite and come up with solutions)» - learning troughout the course, needed to read materail and write about it makes, at least me, take in the information much better.» - That they were instead of the final exam.» - That we got the chance to use our theory and learn the studying material better. We also had the chance to use our critical thinking.» - Good spread of topics.» - The idea of checking knowledge.» - Variety of subjects» - I learnt a lot while doing them. It"s better than having an exam, because the knowledge sticks better.» - That you get to think more on different subjects.» - to some extent, to the target» - give oppotunity to research the topics related to environmental transportation.» - Dividing workload equally over the course. Required much more personal commitment than final exams hence probably learning outcome is better.» 34. What do you think was the worst with the examination reports?- Don"t know.»- they do take aloooooot of time» - crazily HUGE workload !» - *took a lot of time *not handed out in time» - Politics» - The organization with the handouts and the reportation of results» - Too much pressure on writing too many reports. » - 4th» - I didt like the 4th report.» - you got to much to correct, and you haven"t done it yet. And that they were posponed, then one of them should have been taken away» - Correction. If the examiners do not correct as fast as possible, why should we keep the deadlines?» - That when reading what we needed to do, we already knew that we should right a lot of stuff (joking). The examination reports where right on topic and proved to be very useful.» - The postponement of the deadline» - Defining the scope and... RESULTS.» - too many not enough support from literature delayed results» - Poor grading frecuency.» - That they were too many and that they run parallel to each other. Dure to the work load, I just tried to get them done before the deadline. Would have liked to have more time on each.» - the workload is too high...» - The long correction time.» - too much work load.» - Deadlines on Sunday evenings. Any other week day would be better. It tended to take large part of each weekend.» Case studyThis section deals with the case study work.35. How relevant was the case study for achieving the course goals?32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.96 - LCA is one small part of "Environment in Logistics"» (little) 36. How was the workload for the case study?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - again, a bit delayed...» (neutral) 37. How well did the administration, e.g. guidance, handins, correction etc work?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - We got our project very late in the course! » (very poor) 38. Instead of working together with a real company, would you have preferred to work on a theoretical case?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.96 - Well, if someone can manage to link to real environment then the interest is developed and things go well» (Yes, a theoretical case would have been better) 39. What do you think was the best with the case study?- Interesting.»- Interesting» - real world problems and issues» - contact with reality» - Opportunity to both learn and practice a whole method» - Calculation and understanding the basic concept was interesting.» - Cant say» - Different scenarios (almost in all cases) and sensetivity analyses» - good way to learn about LCA» - Being based on a real case. Having to deal with practicalities in data collection and so on.» - That we got real data and contacted a real company.» - The topic of LCA is very relevant for our education.» - Possibility to be innovative and not only follow the template. » - practical example was good in general» - -» - To work on with a real life project.» - a real case from a real company» - Real cases» - case study is good oppotunity.» - Solved in groups» 40. What do you think was the worst with the case study?- Don"t know.»- delayed distribution of it» - Our work felt not interesting for the company...» - rather time consuming» - The final grade was disappointed and it was not our enthusiasm which was leaks but it was not sufficient information which that comes to us on proper time. » - No comment» - nothing» - Too much work, that doesn"t show at all as most were in the figures in an excel sheet. » - That the company did not help much in the beginning, so much of the time was lost.» - The workload. Problems to split the case in two for the two groups working with the same case. » - Sometimes difficult to decide what should be assumed and simplified. » - we don"t know the feedback from the company» - -» - Little contact with our company» - the inequality of the workload between the group member» - not very practical.» Summarizing questions41. What is your general impression of the course?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - The organization of the course brings down the grade dramatically. The course was in many ways to easy, the level should be higher. To many guest lectures takes away the flow of the course and they are often not relevant to the course.» (Poor) 42. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Examination reports and case.»- The exam questions» - real casestudy» - 2-3 Exam Reports (not more!)» - Case study and the format with examination reports» - Reports on every week and case study , preferably organizational case study » - Examination reports.» - Case study» - All reports and case study should be for sure1 and Sonke as an assistent (huge help)» - assignments, but i guess not that many maybe?» - 1. Home exams and the case study 2. The guest lectures by Karl H Robert and the other guy from GU» - 1)These professors that teach the course 2)The same course spirit with all these lectures, presentations and cooperative environment.» - The layout with examination reports and case study instead of exam. » - Case study, examination report.» - Case study, fewer reports» - No exam, but keeep the hand-ins.» - Some of the examination reports, case study.» - the company case» - The natural step lecture» - examination report is good way to learn.» - Hand-ins are good but maybe less of them and join topics. Could be pair work as well» 43. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Christian Azar as a guestlecturer.»- The way the groups was made. First, make a activity registration in the Student Portal so that all students during the first week sign up in a group Attending the course or a group Not attending the course. Then the course assistant makes the groups, thus the fuss of finding partners, and then when some are left, being asked to chose one to have in the group instead of just being assigned one. Faster correction of the examintaion reports» - sten karlsson» - Have a FINAL EXAM !!» - Review the relevance of the guest lectures» - There should not be so many guest lectures, you don"t get a good flow in the course with so many guest lectures. Only some parts of the guest lectures are relevant to the course and much becomes repetition.» - Grading system to be changed, assessment would be based on continuous evaluation not based on case study and final report » - The slides should be uploaded after the lecture» - Lund lectures shoudl be canceled - wasting of time!» - case study, make it a imaginary company instead. the important thing is about learnign about LCA isn"t it? and then you would just have the need to come up with a fiction comapny and numbers about it.» - Corrections have to be done faster.» - Some guest lectures on maritime field should be definitely added.» - No late handouts. Get started directly in week one with everything. » - Literature - it is easier to have compendium and/or book instead of necessity to look for countless articles to answer ERs.» - Guest lecturers should clearly know the focus of the course and their lecture. Examination report results should arrive sooner with the general feedback from each.» - The case should be theorethical.» - Reduce the number of examination reports» - the workload» - Maybe less reports, or stock up resources to correct them faster.» - case study and too much work load.» - Number of hand-ins» 44. Can you recommend others to attend this course?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.45 - except for the grading system...» (Yes) 45. Additional comments- Many questions relate to "the GOALS" while about 90% of the students don"t know them !!»- I have learned environmental aspects on logistics and transportation and it really give me informative knowledge to apply in future.» - Generally, the course was very good orgonized, structured and coordnated. I have got very useful and vital knowledge. Moreover, course structure - having many handings instead of final exam - shows that course coordinators are responsible and not lazy to check all our papars which gives much more and deeper knowledge than in case when a final exam is given!Thank you!» - I am totally happy that I learned this much about environmental issues and now I can call myself an environmentally-aware person, which makes me proud of myself.» - Thank you very much!» - Have less and bigger ERs or more people to read them... Waiting for results so long is unacceptable! Good luck.» - i am not sure if the workload is ok after»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9%