Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Strategy Creation and Change, TEK280

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-22 - 2008-11-05
Antal svar: 27
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 67%
Kontaktperson: Tobias Fredberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. Which master program do you study?

26 svarande

MPQOM»10 38%
MPSEN»2 7%
MPCOM»3 11%
MPMNT»1 3%
MPSCM»1 3%
MPDCF»1 3%
Other»8 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 25%
Around 20 hours/week»13 48%
Around 25 hours/week»5 18%
Around 30 hours/week»2 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- It was a fair deal of time spent mostly with groupwork. » (Around 25 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 7%
75%»13 50%
100%»11 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.34

- Unfortunately due to the health problem, i missed some of the courses.» (50%)
- I would say closer to 85%» (75%)
- Some lectures crashed with other courses» (75%)

4. How engaged were you in the teamwork?

27 svarande

Not active at all»0 0%
Not so active»3 11%
Participated, but was not very engaged»1 3%
Quite active»14 51%
Very active»9 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- It was hard to not be active because otfen we would represent some work after which contribute that you work a little bit extra. » (Very active)

Goals fulfilment and examination

The course syllabus and the lectures have stated the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

5. How understandable were the course goals?

27 svarande

I have not seen/read/heard the goals»0 0%
It was difficult to know what I could expect from the course»2 7%
The goals gave some guidance, but could have been clearer»11 40%
It was clear to me what I could expect to learn from the cou»14 51%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

6. What would you have preferred as examination form?

The course used cases, memos and participation in class discussions as the main examination form. You can here indicate what you think would be appropriate ways of examination. Please click all alternatives that apply.

27 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Written cases»15 55%
Memos»14 51%
Presentations»16 59%
Class participation»8 29%
Smaller diagnostic tests»7 25%
Large traditional written test»4 14%
Discussions of cases that you have read before class»8 29%
Exercises in class»6 22%
No opinion»2

- Class participation evaluate _how_ people participate too. This time, it felt that a lot of people just wanted to have their voice heard because they felt obligated. Hard to avoid though..» (Written cases, Memos, Class participation)
- I found that alot of people in my group hadn"t read anything in the book, a small diagnostic test would probably be good. That would force me atleast to read the book more carefully» (Written cases, Presentations, Smaller diagnostic tests, Discussions of cases that you have read before class)
- it was good. Maybe too much effort spent on the project work. » ()
- Presentation can be good to practice talking in front of people but I don"t think you learn so much.» (Memos, Class participation, Smaller diagnostic tests, Discussions of cases that you have read before class, Exercises in class)
- I think it is perfect the way it is» ()

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 26%
Large extent»14 53%
Great extent»5 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Frankly speaking, it"s impossible to squeeze such a complicated theory to the students in such a short time. I might get a lot of theories but I still feel that i need some suggestions into practical use.» (Some extent)
- The time by industrial participants is too much. i feel over crowded in my mind to absorb 6 industrial participants. » (Large extent)
- Great lecturers. Everyone of them.» (Great extent)

8. To what extent did the excercises contribute to your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»5 20%
Large extent»14 56%
Great extent»4 16%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Most of the exercises are good, but too much salt can spoil the broth. » (Large extent)

9. What did you think of the fact that the lectures were built up on exercises?

27 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Ok»7 26%
Good»14 53%
Very good»5 19%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- It"s a very good thing. But as i know that some of the groups are wasting their time on debating instead of understanding what the real target is.» (Ok)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent»5 18%
Some extent»5 18%
Large extent»14 51%
Great extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- 1) team supervision in the project should also be added on few occassions, to keep track on the project. » (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

27 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 11%
Rather well»18 66%
Very well»6 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Well the web page should be more active :) » (Rather well)
- 1) when some thing has been posted in handout sections, then it should be mentioned on home page as well. Because, usually students do not open hanout section unless they see some posting on home page. 2) For industrial memos and projects, i think hand-in field in homepage should be used instead of e-mailing all that stuff to lecturer. » (Rather well)
- No problems at all and fast contact.» (Very well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.84


The course included different lecturers, both those with an academic background and people from industry.

12. What is your general impression of the set of lecturers that were engaged in the course

26 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 11%
Good»16 61%
Excellent»7 26%

Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the good thing is the lectures being from industry» (Adequate)
- except one of them...» (Good)
- I think, Tobias should deliver some more lectures instead of inviting 6 industrial participants. » (Good)
- It is fun with the industry lectures to see that people in the "real world"acctually are using all the things we read about.» (Excellent)

13. How would you rate the lecturers in the course?

Please use the scale 1-5 where 1=bad and 5=excellent


Tobias Fredberg (main lecturer)
25 svarande

0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
10 40%
15 60%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.6

Nils Lindgren (industry lecture from Borevind)
25 svarande

2 8%
0 0%
7 29%
9 37%
6 25%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Fredrik Dahlsten (Market Strategy)
25 svarande

0 0%
0 0%
7 30%
12 52%
4 17%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.86

Prof. Flemming Norrgren (Change Leadership)
25 svarande

0 0%
0 0%
2 8%
12 52%
9 39%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Henrik Segersvärd (industry lecture from Accenture)
25 svarande

0 0%
0 0%
2 9%
13 59%
7 31%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 4.22

Björn Frössevi (Implementing Strategy)
25 svarande

0 0%
0 0%
6 27%
8 36%
8 36%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 4.09

Mårten Westlund (industry lecturer from Solberg Communications)
25 svarande

0 0%
1 4%
5 20%
12 50%
6 25%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.95

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.15

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

26 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»7 30%
Very good»15 65%
I did not seek help»3

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Would like one small session per group in the middle of the case to be able to ask you questions etc. » (Rather good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked in your teams?

27 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»10 37%
Rather well»11 40%
Very well»6 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Uneven workload.» (Rather poorly)
- vissa personer i gruppen var guld och samarbetet fungerade jättebra medan det även fanns vissa bristande länkar i gruppen. Komma nga timmar försent eller inte dyka upp alls.» (Rather poorly)
- almost all of them were very active» (Rather well)
- Difrrent culture indicates problems, but we handled them well» (Rather well)
- Had a very ambitious group and the cooperation worked well» (Very well)

16. What did you think in general of the work in your teams?

27 svarande

Very bad»1 3%
Bad»1 3%
Ok»10 37%
Good»10 37%
Very good»5 18%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Se ovan. » (Ok)
- With large teams, it is hard to be efficient.» (Good)
- the work we did is very good I think » (Very good)
- Everybody contributed a lot, and actively engaged in the team work.» (Very good)
- thought that everybody had a good morale and we worked well together, although it"s always hard to find a time that fits everybody when we study different master programs » (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.6

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

27 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 18%
Good»14 51%
Excellent»8 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Much like a crash course, where you don"t have time to really master the tools before you are required to use them. » (Good)
- Jättebra kurs som jag rekommenderat till mina kompisar! :-)» (Excellent)
- One of the best courses I have had, but of course it helps if you like the subject.» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Case study. »
- more information on student portal, and more clew for integrate the information in the course»
- exercises »
- The guest lectures.»
- a small written exam would be very useful.»
- industry lectures»
- Exersises during lectures. High amount of industry lectures.»
- Industry lectures»
- the way of learning is so good including the guest lecture»
- Industrilektionerna, jätteintressanta. Kursboken tycker jag har varit bra liksom de engagerade föreläsarna.»
- The structure of the lectures. I think that I learnt alot from the lectures. Good correlation to the course book and articles. Frössevi"s lecture was great he really explained the change processes in a understandable way »
- The guest lectures, the case exercises, the memos, the term paper»
- 1) Project »
- Market Strategy Lecture»
- the schedual for the assignments shouldnt change during the course, makes a bad picture»
- cases, excersises during lectures, industry lectures.»
- The Examination form, the literature, Tobias Fredberg as lecturer, The group work»
- guest lecturers»
- discussion of cases »
- A large analysis exercise»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- not found»
- I think sometimes it was the CEO himself made the strategy so i recommend the student will have the opportunity to do the assignment individually.»
- memo»
- More compulsory individual elements »
- Clear examination requirements from the start. All cases should be about companies facing a change, instead of cases that look back in time. Would be much more interesting and better use of the tools. »
- keep it »
- Kanske inte lägga ner lika mkt vikt på grupparbete, alternativt jobba individuella case, samt case som görs två och två och ett stort case som skrivs av en större grupp. Det första memot var lite för litet för att skriva fem personer tillsammans.»
- 1) Industrial lectures should be less. I think 2 effective industrial lectures with proper time are enough. 2) Instead of memos, literature seminars should be added. Literature seminars could be the indication of participation as well. »
- Nothing»
- writing a list of names for the participants in the mandatory lectures»
- I don"t think you have to change anything, maybe the presentation, but still it is a part of everything so...»
- I know that other groups found it hard to work together on the big task. Some kind of support during the big task perhaps.»
- grading schema»
- more discussion to read the book »
- More particle industrial lectures. Less theories from them»

20. Would you recommend this course to other students?

27 svarande

Yes»27 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- it is very intersting because during the course we try to analyze different topics based on real situation so it is a role model for combiining the theory with practical concepts» (Yes)
- I have already done that =)» (Yes)

21. Additional comments

- It"s could be better if the teacher can give some extra materials to the students who are not willing to pay for the books. »
- Well since in the beginning that some of the students were not willing to pay for that expensive books, the teacher can bring some extra materials for them.»
- in overall was Good, almost 70%!»
- En av de roligaste kurserna jag läst på Chalmers.»
- Tobias is really nice, and I like his attitude towards the class, keep up the good work.»
- the last lecture in the last week shouldnt be omited»
- Good luck in the future! »
- Loved the course, thank you for everything»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.11

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.32
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.69

Kursutvärderingssystem från