Visa resultat

Strategy Creation and Change, TEK280

1. Which master program do you study?

MPQOM»		10		38%
MPSEN»		2		7%
MPCOM»		3		11%
MPMNT»		1		3%
MPSCM»		1		3%
MPDCF»		1		3%
Other»		8		30%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

27 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		7		25%
Around 20 hours/week»		13		48%
Around 25 hours/week»		5		18%
Around 30 hours/week»		2		7%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- It was a fair deal of time spent mostly with groupwork. » (Around 25 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		2		7%
75%»		13		50%
100%»		11		42%

Genomsnitt: 4.34

- Unfortunately due to the health problem, i missed some of the courses.» (50%)
- I would say closer to 85%» (75%)
- Some lectures crashed with other courses» (75%)

4. How engaged were you in the teamwork?

Not active at all»		0		0%
Not so active»		3		11%
Participated, but was not very engaged»		1		3%
Quite active»		14		51%
Very active»		9		33%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- It was hard to not be active because otfen we would represent some work after which contribute that you work a little bit extra. » (Very active)

Goals fulfilment and examination

5. How understandable were the course goals?

I have not seen/read/heard the goals»		0		0%
It was difficult to know what I could expect from the course»		2		7%
The goals gave some guidance, but could have been clearer»		11		40%
It was clear to me what I could expect to learn from the cou»		14		51%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

6. What would you have preferred as examination form?

27 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Written cases»		15		55%
Memos»		14		51%
Presentations»		16		59%
Class participation»		8		29%
Smaller diagnostic tests»		7		25%
Large traditional written test»		4		14%
Discussions of cases that you have read before class»		8		29%
Exercises in class»		6		22%
No opinion»		2

- Class participation evaluate _how_ people participate too. This time, it felt that a lot of people just wanted to have their voice heard because they felt obligated. Hard to avoid though..» (Written cases, Memos, Class participation)
- I found that alot of people in my group hadn"t read anything in the book, a small diagnostic test would probably be good. That would force me atleast to read the book more carefully» (Written cases, Presentations, Smaller diagnostic tests, Discussions of cases that you have read before class)
- it was good. Maybe too much effort spent on the project work. » ()
- Presentation can be good to practice talking in front of people but I don"t think you learn so much.» (Memos, Class participation, Smaller diagnostic tests, Discussions of cases that you have read before class, Exercises in class)
- I think it is perfect the way it is» ()

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		7		26%
Large extent»		14		53%
Great extent»		5		19%

Genomsnitt: 2.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Frankly speaking, it"s impossible to squeeze such a complicated theory to the students in such a short time. I might get a lot of theories but I still feel that i need some suggestions into practical use.» (Some extent)
- The time by industrial participants is too much. i feel over crowded in my mind to absorb 6 industrial participants. » (Large extent)
- Great lecturers. Everyone of them.» (Great extent)

8. To what extent did the excercises contribute to your learning?

Small extent»		2		8%
Some extent»		5		20%
Large extent»		14		56%
Great extent»		4		16%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 2.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Most of the exercises are good, but too much salt can spoil the broth. » (Large extent)

9. What did you think of the fact that the lectures were built up on exercises?

Very bad»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%
Ok»		7		26%
Good»		14		53%
Very good»		5		19%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- It"s a very good thing. But as i know that some of the groups are wasting their time on debating instead of understanding what the real target is.» (Ok)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		5		18%
Some extent»		5		18%
Large extent»		14		51%
Great extent»		3		11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- 1) team supervision in the project should also be added on few occassions, to keep track on the project. » (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		3		11%
Rather well»		18		66%
Very well»		6		22%

Genomsnitt: 3.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Well the web page should be more active :) » (Rather well)
- 1) when some thing has been posted in handout sections, then it should be mentioned on home page as well. Because, usually students do not open hanout section unless they see some posting on home page. 2) For industrial memos and projects, i think hand-in field in homepage should be used instead of e-mailing all that stuff to lecturer. » (Rather well)
- No problems at all and fast contact.» (Very well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.84

Lecturers

12. What is your general impression of the set of lecturers that were engaged in the course

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		11%
Good»		16		61%
Excellent»		7		26%

Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the good thing is the lectures being from industry» (Adequate)
- except one of them...» (Good)
- I think, Tobias should deliver some more lectures instead of inviting 6 industrial participants. » (Good)
- It is fun with the industry lectures to see that people in the "real world"acctually are using all the things we read about.» (Excellent)

13. How would you rate the lecturers in the course?

Matrisfråga

Tobias Fredberg (main lecturer)
25 svarande

1»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		0		0%
4»		10		40%
5»		15		60%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 4.6

Nils Lindgren (industry lecture from Borevind)
25 svarande

1»		2		8%
2»		0		0%
3»		7		29%
4»		9		37%
5»		6		25%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Fredrik Dahlsten (Market Strategy)
25 svarande

1»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		7		30%
4»		12		52%
5»		4		17%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 3.86

Prof. Flemming Norrgren (Change Leadership)
25 svarande

1»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		2		8%
4»		12		52%
5»		9		39%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Henrik Segersvärd (industry lecture from Accenture)
25 svarande

1»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		2		9%
4»		13		59%
5»		7		31%
No opinion»		3

Genomsnitt: 4.22

Björn Frössevi (Implementing Strategy)
25 svarande

1»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		6		27%
4»		8		36%
5»		8		36%
No opinion»		3

Genomsnitt: 4.09

Mårten Westlund (industry lecturer from Solberg Communications)
25 svarande

1»		0		0%
2»		1		4%
3»		5		20%
4»		12		50%
5»		6		25%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.95

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.15

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		1		4%
Rather good»		7		30%
Very good»		15		65%
I did not seek help»		3

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Would like one small session per group in the middle of the case to be able to ask you questions etc. » (Rather good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked in your teams?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		10		37%
Rather well»		11		40%
Very well»		6		22%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Uneven workload.» (Rather poorly)
- vissa personer i gruppen var guld och samarbetet fungerade jättebra medan det även fanns vissa bristande länkar i gruppen. Komma nga timmar försent eller inte dyka upp alls.» (Rather poorly)
- almost all of them were very active» (Rather well)
- Difrrent culture indicates problems, but we handled them well» (Rather well)
- Had a very ambitious group and the cooperation worked well» (Very well)

16. What did you think in general of the work in your teams?

Very bad»		1		3%
Bad»		1		3%
Ok»		10		37%
Good»		10		37%
Very good»		5		18%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Se ovan. » (Ok)
- With large teams, it is hard to be efficient.» (Good)
- the work we did is very good I think » (Very good)
- Everybody contributed a lot, and actively engaged in the team work.» (Very good)
- thought that everybody had a good morale and we worked well together, although it"s always hard to find a time that fits everybody when we study different master programs » (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.6

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		5		18%
Good»		14		51%
Excellent»		8		29%

Genomsnitt: 4.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Much like a crash course, where you don"t have time to really master the tools before you are required to use them. » (Good)
- Jättebra kurs som jag rekommenderat till mina kompisar! :-)» (Excellent)
- One of the best courses I have had, but of course it helps if you like the subject.» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

20. Would you recommend this course to other students?

Yes»		27		100%
No»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- it is very intersting because during the course we try to analyze different topics based on real situation so it is a role model for combiining the theory with practical concepts» (Yes)
- I have already done that =)» (Yes)

21. Additional comments