|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Science of Environmental Change, FFR166Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-10-22 - 2008-10-31 Antal svar: 36 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 59% Kontaktperson: Sten Karlsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. Which programme do you belong to?36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.75 - Hill, though I was registered this course for it is one of complusory courses for me, I did not take it this quater and plan to take it next year at this quater.So, I am sorry that I cannot give my evaluation to this course this time.» (MP Industrial Ecology) 2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.51 - Around 40 hours the 2 weeks before the exam.» (Around 20 hours/week) 3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.34 - I basically gave up attendingthe lectures since they were of extremely bad quality. Send the lecturers to English school!» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - Still seems so much to learn, so many details and drawings. Feels like a Med School.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn) 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.17 - But it is a course that deals with a lot of different areas, so they are almost to high for a 7.5 credit course.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - Jag tycker att tenan var lite väl omfattande för den tid vid hade på oss, många klasskompisar jag talat med instämmer. Fast man stressade från början till slut så hann man inte, många frågor hade man kunnat svaret på om man bara fått tid att tänka lite.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - The slides and the content of the lectures were good, but maybe not always the explanations from the teachers. It seems like teaching in English are holding back some of the teachers.» (Large extent) 8. To what extent has the lectures about by Sten Karlsson been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - Really bad lectures. Language problems. Lack of structure.» (Small extent) 9. To what extent has the lectures by Evert Ljungström (atm chem) been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - Really bad lectures. Language problems. Lack of structure.» (Small extent) 10. To what extent has the lectures by Rod Stevens (fresh water) been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.7 - Still not acceptable quality but better than the former.» (Some extent) 11. To what extent has the lectures by Stefan Wirsenius (soils, acidification) been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - Especially the lecture handouts» (Some extent) 12. To what extent has the lectures by Kjell Wallin (bioresources) been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.51 - Good Lecture!» (Large extent) 13. To what extent has the lectures by Thomas Backhaus (ecotox.) been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.41 - Jag var sjuk under hans föreläsningar» (Small extent) 14. To what extent has the three hand-ins been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.82 - Räkningarna har varit för enkla men insamlandet av information var mycket tidskrävande för liten vinning. Den nedlagda tiden på inlämningarna representerade inte förhållandet på tentan.
Det kändes som ett nollmoment (arbete som ej ger poäng), är det tillåtet på chalmers?» (Small extent) 15. To what extent was the presentation of a paper a valuable moment?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - illa vald tidpunkt. jag uppfattade det som att ingen riktigt brudde sig om uppgiften eftersom den låg såpassa nära inpå tentan» (Small extent) 16. To what extent was the demonstations etc by Ulrika Lundqvist of help for your learning?33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - I was not in her group» (Small extent) 17. To what extent extent was the demonstations etc by Julia Hansson of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.14 - she didn"t explain anything just wrote the answers on the board» (Small extent) 18. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - jag har aldrig använt internet så mycket för att lösa problem tidigare. jag blev verkligen besviken på att kurslitteraturen inte användes mer» (Small extent) 19. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - Att få slides på föreläsningen är försent, måste finnas uppe kvällen innan så man kan förbreda sig inför föreläsningen. *.doc går inte att läsa i alla operativsystem, det gör PDF.
Kontaktuppgifter saknades till lärare på kurshemsidan, fanns dock i dokument.» (Very badly) Study climate20. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.41 - I vissa fall kunde man få tydliga besked om vad som gällde för inlämningsuppgifterna men långt ifrån alla tillfällen.
När det känns som att lärarens engelska är den begränsande faktorn är det mycket frustrerande att frågor endast får tas på engelska trotts att alla närvarande är svenskar.» (Rather poor) 21. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.74 - My group members have tight schedule but we managed to get together for the hand-ins. Good job, guys!» (Very well) 22. How was the course workload?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.82 - hand-ins tog för mycket tid tyckte jag» (High) Summarizing questions23. What is your general impression of the course?35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - Lousy quality of lectures and material. The course covers too much and lacks structure.» (Poor) 24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Hand ins»- bra med hand ins men kanske ha lite mindre uppgifter i stället för så omfattande» - The three handins but less requiring» - more groupwork» - Inlämningarna, även om dom skulle behöva kopplas mer till föreläsningarna.» - the hand-ins were good for learning.» - handins» - i wish there would be more connection between contents conducted by discrete teachers.» - Hand-ins are good as you need to work in groups and can help each other, but the questions should begin a bit easier so we understand how to think and then maybe become more difficult. An example in class would be good.» - The usual.» - different teachers is intresting» - The hand outs but maybe with some changes in the tasks ..and definetely the presentation of the article.» - -» - As I understand the aims of the course it is supposed to give an overview of environmental change, and it did. Therefore I think it is a good thing that so many different teachers are involved teaching their area of expertise.» 25. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The exam was to long! I didn"t even have time check my answers before the time ran out.»- Lecturers» - använd kursboken mer. det känns inte motiverande att köpa en bok för 600kr och sedan inte använda den» - There is too much reading material. It should be stated from the course start how many bonus points you could get from the hand ins. To change it at the end of the course as it was made now is disrespectful and unprofessional.» - Hand out the hadins earlier, so that you don"t only have tuesday-friday to do them, before the weekend is better.» - in some lectures there were too much graphs and tables showing too much detials and sometimes also the same thing... may be a bit less graphs and tables and instead explaining some topics a bit better! Sometimes the graphs and figures were also too small in the handed out paper (sometimes on the ppt as well) » - Either more time during the exam OR less questions. Too little time was given!!!!!» - Assignment questions should be available earlier (not just a few days before hand-in)» - clear the goal» - the exam» - Något som knyter ihop kursen mer. Tentan som med 18 frågor gör det svårt att avgöra var man ska lägga krutet.» - the presentation of the article. i"ve never experienced that i haven"t had enough time to answer all the questions at an examination before but there were too many questions and too little time. » - the time on the exam, shorter exam or an 5h exam» - The book is too expensive. You should use a different method or make a course compendium that could be sold at Cremona.» - REmove one of the hand-ins, since the other course that quarter has three hand-ins as well, too much time is consumed in doing hand-ins instead of having time to read the book and extra material.» - Sometimes ppt slides are too much and we get confused about which is more important.» - Hand-in question formulation. Either use the book or don´,t ask the students to buy it (only necessary for chemistry part). Altogher the course was a bit stressful with all the different parts. » - Exam questions. Please make it more "conservative". Biological population seems a bit out of context, or perhaps it"s just me.» - chemistry part could be improved» - -» - More time on the exam.» - The article presentation did not teach me much, maybe it should be changed somehow or even be completely removed.» 26. Additional comments- The lecturers on this school has to learn english if we are to claim that it is an international university!!!!»- The exam did not reflect the things highlighted in the lectures. 18 questions in 4 hours is way to much, there was no chance of having the time to answer all questions. The bonus points were too little worth compared to the average time spent on them. Many thanks to Ulrika and Julia who spent time on answering questions related to the hand-ins!» - no» - Många små detaljer gjorde kursen svår att förstå. Det grundläggande innehållet är bra och viktigt.» - The content and focus on climate change was good. The workload with a lot to read and the additional hand-ins was a bit too much to digest.» - Exam was terrible. However it might serve to remind us that there is still much to be learned.» - -» - The course goes too deep into too many different subjects. It"s quite possible to get an overview of the different parts, but the examination asked for much deeper knowledge.» - In my opinion, this is a course that could well be taught to the students as an elective course in all bachelor programmes so that the master programmes could focus on more specialized subjects. »
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63%