Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ship Stability and Geometry, MMA 136

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-23 - 2008-11-11
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 84%
Kontaktperson: martin schreuder»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 26%
Around 20 hours/week»8 53%
Around 25 hours/week»1 6%
Around 30 hours/week»2 13%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- less than 10 hours/week» (?)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»2 12%
75%»5 31%
100%»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- I enjoyed lectures, tutorials and PCLab, I felt that it is very useful to attend classes!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»1 8%
To some extent»3 25%
Yes, definitely»8 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- The theory questions where a bit strange. For example the damage triangle, we had one lecture on that (that i missed) and no questions prior to the exam.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the Lectures been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»3 18%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.31

- Ronnie Hanzens should distribute lecture notes beforehand.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the Design Classes been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»3 18%
Some extent»4 25%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Autoship should be replaced with something better.» (Some extent)
- Concerning the design process the Design classes have been vital, concerning what was asked in the final exam I did not neet that except for the understanding of the statistic approach. Nevertheless I think it was a major and very interesting part of the course.» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the Tutorials been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 25%
Large extent»6 37%
Great extent»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Räkningarna var bra. De skulle vara ännu bättre om man hade räknat samma tal som nu fast i lite snabbare hastighet, så att det blev lite tid över varje tutorial att räkna själv i häftet, men med läraren närvarande. Ellet tid till att diskutera hur teorin vävs in i det vi räknar.» (Large extent)
- Vital for the exam. of course one can always go through the solutions by ones own but support and active classes make it much easier to learn and understand» (Great extent)

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»2 13%
Some extent»8 53%
Large extent»3 20%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- The course book is not very good at all.» (Some extent)
- The compendium was extremely hard to understand. Way to complicated sometimes.» (Some extent)
- Men här måste det hända något! Jag har fått kämpa för att komma upp i "large extent". Kursboken är riktigt dålig och bör skrivas om. Ronny är bra och har en massa bra texter och förklaringar på sina overheads, tyvärr hinner man inte skriva ner allt under lektionen. Låt honom skriva en bok, eller ge ut hans OH.» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»5 31%
Very well»10 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- We were promised copies of the slides from Ronny"s lectures but the slides never showed up!» (Rather badly)
- Förutom att vi inte fick ronnys OH.» (Rather well)
- just perfect» (Very well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»5 31%
Very good»8 50%
I did not seek help»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Hade varit bra med 1h egen räkning med lärare inplanerat varje vecka. Det känns ibland stressigt att fråga i pausen, vilket gör att man kanske väljer att inte fråga...» (Rather good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 6%
Very well»14 87%
I did not seek cooperation»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I did not seek much help7cooperation, but on the occasins that I have it was nice.» (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 18%
Adequate»10 62%
High»3 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

14. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 12%
Adequate»9 56%
High»4 25%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 18%
Good»10 62%
Excellent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 4

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- design classes»
- häftet med räkneuppgifter, men lägg frågorna i den ordning det är tänkt att räkna dem. Det blev lite struligt i år.»
- The design project. It greatly helps to understand the process of designing and its a cool thing to do (at least for me it was very cool)»
- tutorials are great. no need to change them.»
- You have to keep tutorials and autoship lectures. It was very interesting.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the course book is not so good.»
- more tutorials»
- More structure for the theory portion of the course. A large picture was rarely given regarding the theory, just individual concepts explained. More structure for the book. »
- Kursboken!»
- Course book.»
- a better book. ronnie"s lectures are not always easily understood. could have some of the tutorial problems as mandatory assignments and have them contribute to the final grade. »
- The lectures are too long and difficult to understand sometime»

18. Additional comments

- I think its good to present some examples in the tutorials and leave enough for self-study (as it has been) and provide solutions that enable you to follow the calculation if you get stuck somewhere. »
- i would like to thank the teachers for their cooperation. they have been very helpful all through the way.»
- Ronnie is a nice and funny guy, and I"m sure he is an expert of his work, but he is not well suited for teaching. I stopped attending his classes after some time because I was always more confused after his classes than before.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från