|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPRSS: RRY025 Image Processing Sp1, 08/09Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-10-20 - 2008-10-31 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.88 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Because of lecture collisions» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - I think it is better to determine if the goal is learning the concepts comprehensively or learning the implementation methods.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.93 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - I spent most of the time studying the book, but the exam only assesses the ability in exercises. No problem with this, if only I could know it in advance...» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.77 - Teaching is really great but a bit to easy» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 - The book was great! Some parts such as wavelets was hard though..» (Great extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - Very great with a lot of matlab examples» (?) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Alessandro and John are both very helpfull» (Very good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - Cooperated during the project. » (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - Hard/tuff course...» (High) 12. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - Fewer handins than usual. Was a good variation compared to other courses in communication engineering.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.77 - You learn a lot. Maybe too little theory.» (Good) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Alessandro"s lecture and studio exercises»- the lecture can be more deeper in math,cus what we learnt in lecture is much easier than the exam» - The offer to always interrupt the teacher for asking questions.» - Alessandro is a great teacher with a big interest!» - The Wavelet course. It seems very important. Although it seemed quite general... Maybe could we get a more advanced explanation of the way they work ??...» - Alessandro :) » - The exercizes» - matlab, projects, the Italian food!» - The two professors! They"re both really good at teaching. Preserve the qualitative approach to wavelets.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the lecture can be more deeper in math,cus what we learnt in lecture is much easier than the exam»- More help, maybe question times... Even last week...» - The matlab demos are not always relevant. Some of them are just "observing" without necessarily understanding. Especially the approach on the DFT.. A Basic approach showing how well a 1D signal is reconstructed using more and more harmonics over its fundamental would be more intuitive... (My opinion from previous courses...) » - most group had done very poor job on the projects and were really boring to listen to. The project should be on a level "above" the course material to make it interesting, at least some good conclusions should be made. The goal of the projects should be for the student to learn something cool to the other students!» - I didn"t like the fact that everyone got 5 points for the project. This is probably because I feel I spent too much time on that, and I should probably have spent less. Give 5 points as a bonus for the exam, and make the project a pass/fail » 16. Additional comments- Very good lecturing! Wonderful pedagogy»- I thought that the exam was a bit more difficult compaired to previous years. When you practice on earlier ones you learns how the questions are asked...» - it could be a good idea to make some assignments with deadlines each weeks.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44%