Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY025 Image Processing Sp1, 08/09

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-20 - 2008-10-31
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 44%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»3 16%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»3 16%
75%»9 50%
100%»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Because of lecture collisions» (50%)
- Couldn"t attend on mondays due to work.» (75%)
- One lecture missed each week since i had lab in another course at the same time.» (75%)
- missed 1 hour each week» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 22%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think it is better to determine if the goal is learning the concepts comprehensively or learning the implementation methods.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 27%
Yes, definitely»5 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- I spent most of the time studying the book, but the exam only assesses the ability in exercises. No problem with this, if only I could know it in advance...» (To some extent)
- Tested most parts of the course.» (Yes, definitely)
- The exam were much more difficult than any exercises done during the lectures. However I probably passed the exams due to the old exams.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 38%
Large extent»8 44%
Great extent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Teaching is really great but a bit to easy» (Some extent)
- Alessandro is GREAT!» (Large extent)
- Alessandro was great. He felt really devoted, wanted people to understand.» (Large extent)
- Alessandro is fun and interesting~» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»3 16%
Some extent»3 16%
Large extent»8 44%
Great extent»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- The book was great! Some parts such as wavelets was hard though..» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 41%
Very well»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- Very great with a lot of matlab examples» (?)
- The informal webpage was good. Lot"s of useful material.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 11%
Very good»14 77%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Alessandro and John are both very helpfull» (Very good)
- You could always ask during the sessions.» (Very good)
- its just hard to know what to ask. A idea for the last lectures would be to go over some old exams.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 44%
Very well»9 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Cooperated during the project. » (Rather well)
- :-)» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»15 83%
High»1 5%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- Hard/tuff course...» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»6 33%
High»10 55%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Fewer handins than usual. Was a good variation compared to other courses in communication engineering.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 11%
Adequate»3 16%
Good»10 55%
Excellent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- You learn a lot. Maybe too little theory.» (Good)
- A very useful course. Helped me understand a lot of basic image processing methods.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Alessandro"s lecture and studio exercises»
- the lecture can be more deeper in math,cus what we learnt in lecture is much easier than the exam»
- The offer to always interrupt the teacher for asking questions.»
- Alessandro is a great teacher with a big interest!»
- The Wavelet course. It seems very important. Although it seemed quite general... Maybe could we get a more advanced explanation of the way they work ??...»
- Alessandro :) »
- The exercizes»
- matlab, projects, the Italian food!»
- The two professors! They"re both really good at teaching. Preserve the qualitative approach to wavelets.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the lecture can be more deeper in math,cus what we learnt in lecture is much easier than the exam»
- More help, maybe question times... Even last week...»
- The matlab demos are not always relevant. Some of them are just "observing" without necessarily understanding. Especially the approach on the DFT.. A Basic approach showing how well a 1D signal is reconstructed using more and more harmonics over its fundamental would be more intuitive... (My opinion from previous courses...) »
- most group had done very poor job on the projects and were really boring to listen to. The project should be on a level "above" the course material to make it interesting, at least some good conclusions should be made. The goal of the projects should be for the student to learn something cool to the other students!»
- I didn"t like the fact that everyone got 5 points for the project. This is probably because I feel I spent too much time on that, and I should probably have spent less. Give 5 points as a bonus for the exam, and make the project a pass/fail »

16. Additional comments

- Very good lecturing! Wonderful pedagogy»
- I thought that the exam was a bit more difficult compaired to previous years. When you practice on earlier ones you learns how the questions are asked...»
- it could be a good idea to make some assignments with deadlines each weeks.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från