ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FKA196, Q1 2008

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-16 - 2008-11-31
Antal svar: 38
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 76%
Kontaktperson: Ulf Södervall»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

35 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 6 17%

Around 20 hours/week» 10 28%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 11%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 2%

At least 35 hours/week» 14 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

35 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 2%

75%» 7 20%

100%» 27 77%

Genomsnitt: 4.74

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

35 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 2%

The goals are difficult to understand» 9 25%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 12 34%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 13 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

36 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 23 63%

No, the goals are set too high» 13 36%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

36 svarande

No, not at all» 7 19%

To some extent» 21 58%

Yes, definitely» 6 16%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 2 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

36 svarande

Small extent» 11 30%

Some extent» 9 25%

Large extent» 12 33%

Great extent» 4 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

7. Would you prefer one teacher for the whole course or several, each specializing in a particular topic of the course?

(Think of different styles of teaching and expectations regarding level of difficulty or comprehension)

38 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

One» 4 10%

Maximum two» 6 15%

Maximum three» 3 7%

Each lecture should be given by a dedicated specialist» 17 44%

Does not matter» 7 18%

No opinion» 1

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

36 svarande

Small extent» 14 38%

Some extent» 5 13%

Large extent» 13 36%

Great extent» 4 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.19

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

36 svarande

Very badly» 9 25%

Rather badly» 2 5%

Rather well» 11 30%

Very well» 14 38%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Particular course moments

10. What do you think about quiz home assignments?

36 svarande

Very bad idea» 0 0%

Bad idea» 0 0%

Neutral» 15 41%

Good idea» 17 47%

Very goog idea» 4 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

- » (Good idea) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- » (Good idea) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- » (Very goog idea) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

11. Did quiz-exercises help you learn the course material?

36 svarande

No, they even hindered my learning» 0 0%

No, it was a waste of time» 1 2%

Cannot say» 3 8%

Yes, they helped somewhat» 27 75%

Yes, they helped very much» 5 13%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. What do you think about the quiz-based examination?

(To be compared to the common essay-writing alternative)

36 svarande

Very bad idea» 1 2%

Bad idea» 3 8%

No opinion» 2 5%

Good idea» 25 69%

Very good idea» 5 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

13. How many quiz-questions do you think is feasible to answer during four hours of exam?

36 svarande

50-75» 12 33%

75-100» 2 5%

100-125» 4 11%

125-150» 10 27%

150-175» 5 13%

175-200» 2 5%

200-225» 1 2%

225-250» 0 0%

250-275» 0 0%

275-300» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

36 svarande

Very poor» 11 30%

Rather poor» 2 5%

Rather good» 9 25%

Very good» 13 36%

I did not seek help» 1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

36 svarande

Very poorly» 8 22%

Rather poorly» 6 16%

Rather well» 11 30%

Very well» 10 27%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

16. How was the course workload?

36 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 3 8%

Adequate» 19 52%

High» 4 11%

Too high» 10 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

17. How was the total workload this study period?

36 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 16 44%

High» 5 13%

Too high» 15 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.97

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

36 svarande

Poor» 10 27%

Fair» 3 8%

Adequate» 5 13%

Good» 8 22%

Excellent» 10 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- quiz and lab work»
- quiz»
- quiz & lab work»
- lab work»
- lab work»
- lab work & quiz»
- cleanroom activity»
- labs, security stuff, avgusts lectures, exam, A4 written notes, poster project»
- lab activites, mini conference, personalized photolit masks, teachers!»
- Mostly everything. Could be nice if time allows it to have more demonstration on other techniques. »
- The last lecturer was very good. »
- Quizes and lab demonstration.»
- Quiz exam»
- Quiz questions, presentation and lab sessions.»
- poster project, CMOS lecture, quiz paper format »
- The laborations»
- quizes and exposition»
- The quiz system.»
- some questions and answer"s lectures, specified to problems»
- Quiz type questions should definitely be preserved for next year.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- no»
- Change it easier to understand for different background students»
- the way of submitting and evaluating quizzes.»
- better pdf from guest lecturers, less options on exam, information on webpage in better time»
- quiz - good idea, but needs to be thought better, maybe including a few meetings with the teacher to review the questions formulated by the students and clear doubts on the topics covered lectures - preferably not after lunch... guess why mornings would be best i think»
- The lab time should be placed in final week rather than the lecture...In lab week we have much spare time, but in end all courses came and we need to wait for new quiz just one day before exam. »
- nothing»
- Maybe the group can be divided in two.»
- rules for quizes, perhaps adding a supervisor that will only review the question in order to be good and understandable.»
- some of the presentations (course materials) be much more aimed at the course objective (there were slides which just had formulas, but no explanation which was hard to review)»
- More deeper aspects of some techniques should be explained.Theory type questions should also be included.»

21. Additional comments

- great course and great teachers, keep it!»
- no exam»
- no exam in future»
- No examination»
- No exam»
- No exam in needed. Only Lab work is enough.»
- Only lab work is enough, no exam at the end.»
- More cleanroom activity is needed. More lab work. NO EXAM at the end.»
- More lab work and No written exam at the end of the course.»
- 1.Exiting student to find that the subject is very interesting (because it is really interesting) 2.Encouraging students to study the text book, articles and understanding the subject deeply, instead of try to memorizing the quiz just for passing the exam. 3.The deep understanding and motivation will help students to create new ideas. »
- The course content covers a wide range of micro/nano fabrication, yet also too wide for students to have a deep understanding. Most of the contents should be strengthened in the future either in this course or other courses. Otherwise, people just forget.»
- Course is good just like program. It must be included in 1st term. MC2 lab is facinating. Teachers are very well educated n experienced. Tutorials can be added ino the program. Study tour to industry would be a great adventure.»
- In the exam it is very easy for a person who (did not understand anything/understood very little) to get a high grade just by going through the quiz questions a number of times and rote learning them.»
- Introduce more lab sections as it help the beginners to understand better the theory/method discuss in the class.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från