Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of microwave monolithic integrated circuits (MMIC), EME110, MPMPE, HT2008, EME110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-13 - 2008-11-02
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 16%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»1 16%
Around 30 hours/week»3 50%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»1 16%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 50%
100%»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- Morteza help me a lot.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- But still I would make this course last over 2 quarters, it"s the only course in the master program covering the non-linear devices properly and 7 weeks is not enough for this.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- No exam but a design task» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»1 16%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 66%
Very well»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- All the homeassignments were handed out too late, and had arbitrary deadlines. The designkit used in laborations didn"t work properly.» (Very badly)
- Handouts should be deliveried right after the lectures.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»6 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»5 83%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
High»2 33%
Too high»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- Since the design tasks were handed out a month too late, there was a large workload near the end of the course.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
High»4 66%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the organization of the coures is good. such as the Labs, Home assignments, design task and Quizs.»
- Content and course structure.»
- design task»
- Guest lectures about RF-IC.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the content of quizes and labs should be more related to the course»
- Like described earlier, 2 quarters.»
- it would be better to stick to the schedule»
- If you "expect deadlines to be met", you should do so yourselves. Check in advance that the laborations can be carried out, so everyone doesn"t have to sit around waiting for two hours before the designkits are available. Hand out the Lab-PMs in advance, otherwise it is difficult to prepare.»

16. Additional comments

- workload is heavy»
- I would like to learn more about the practical aspects of MMIC design. In it"s current form, its mostly a repetition of Piotrs and Stakes courses, ie mostly theoretical and not about implementation.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från