ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Manufacturing strategy, TEK195

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-14 - 2008-10-31
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 21%
Kontaktperson: Alexander Styhre»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 13%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 53%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 26%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 6%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%» 1 6%

25%» 1 6%

50%» 2 13%

75%» 5 33%

100%» 6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 13%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 6%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 12 80%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 13 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all» 2 13%

To some extent» 6 40%

Yes, definitely» 6 40%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- I think using study cases will be more helpful than using detail questions(multipul choices)!» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 1 6%

Some extent» 8 53%

Large extent» 4 26%

Great extent» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 1 6%

Some extent» 2 13%

Large extent» 10 66%

Great extent» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly» 1 6%

Rather badly» 1 6%

Rather well» 9 60%

Very well» 4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- it was two different dates for the deadline of the project, very confusing!» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 2 13%

Rather good» 6 40%

Very good» 6 40%

I did not seek help» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- it took very long time to get an answer of mail, and some questions were not answered» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 6%

Rather well» 3 20%

Very well» 11 73%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 6%

Adequate» 7 46%

High» 6 40%

Too high» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- maybe better to just have a project in this course (a little bigger one) and no written exam» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 13%

Adequate» 7 46%

High» 5 33%

Too high» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor» 1 6%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 33%

Good» 7 46%

Excellent» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project»
- the lecturers Jon Rognes and Markus Ejenäs was very competent»
- The preject work! And the teachers, they were very good!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A smaller number of lecturers»
- Smaller book to read. Slides available before the courses»
- Type of examination! Using both kinds of detail and comprehensive questions of such massive litrature,is not fair at all!»
- don"t have that many "point lists" on the exam, it doesn"t shows what you understand, it only shows how good you can remember listing words»

16. Additional comments

- would prefer some more commitment from the course supervisor»

Kursutvärderingssystem från