ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY015 Space Science and Techniques Sp1, 08/09

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-20 - 2008-10-31
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 33%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»3 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 16%
75%»2 33%
100%»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- clearly arranged and short with many details» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Useful to get more informations about special topics» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 33%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

9. What is your opinion about the group work

6 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Not useful, I learned only little from the discussions»2 33%
Useful, I learned much from the discussions»2 33%
Very useful, I learned very much from the discussions»1 16%
Too little time scheduled»0 0%
Adequate time scheduled»3 50%
Too much time scheduled»1 16%
The groups were too small»1 16%
The groups were of adequate size»3 50%
The groups were too large»0 0%

10. Suggest how the group work can be improved next year!

- Get the topic for the first group meeting a few days before the group meeting starts »

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 83%
Very well»1 16%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

13. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
High»3 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- we could have deeper understanding of some parts tahn shallow one of too many subjects.» (High)
- 16. What should definitely be preserved to next year? 17. What should definitely be changed to next year?» (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
High»2 33%
Too high»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the group work»
- The orbit part, space environment, temperature control, attitude control»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- course content on space physics must get higher than the techiques»
- Some material can be left out, especially about communications, which is taken up in the microwave course. (or maybe have it in the microwave course and not in the space science course)»

18. Additional comments

- Exercises were well prepared. Per has a good idea to hand out the exercises with not a full solution, so I had more time to understand the exercises.»
- 4 hours was not enough time to do the exam properly.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från